• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大卫对阵歌利亚:手持式肠道超声与磁共振肠道成像诊断克罗恩病的直接比较。

David Against Goliath: Direct Comparison of Handheld Bowel Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease.

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Apr 3;29(4):563-569. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac116.

DOI:10.1093/ibd/izac116
PMID:35666249
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) requires ileo-colonoscopy (IC) and cross-sectional evaluation. Recently, "echoscopy" has been used effectively in several settings, although data about its use for CD diagnosis are still limited. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of handheld bowel sonography (HHBS) in comparison with magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) for CD diagnosis.

METHODS

From September 2019 to June 2021, we prospectively recruited consecutive subjects attending our third level IBD Unit for suspected CD. Patients underwent IC, HHBS, and MRE in random order with operators blinded about the result of the other procedures. Bivariate correlation between MRE and HHBS was calculated by Spearman coefficient (r). To test the consistency between MRE and HHBS for CD location and complications, the Cohen's k measure was applied.

RESULTS

Crohn's disease diagnosis was made in 48 out of 85 subjects (56%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for CD diagnosis were 87.50%, 91.89%, 93.33%, and 85% for HHBS; and 91.67%, 94.59%, 95.65%, and 89.74% for MRE, without significant differences in terms of diagnostic accuracy (89.41% for HHBS vs 92.94% for MRE, P = NS). Magnetic resonance enterography was superior to HHBS in defining CD extension (r = 0.67; P < .01) with a better diagnostic performance than HHBS for detecting location (k = 0.81; P < .01), strictures (k = 0.75; P < .01), abscesses (k = 0.68; P < .01), and fistulas (k = 0.65; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Handheld bowel sonography and MRE are 2 accurate and noninvasive procedures for diagnosis of CD, although MRE is more sensitive in defining extension, location, and complications. Handheld bowel sonography could be used as effective ambulatory (or out-of-office) screening tool for identifying patients to refer for MRE examination due to high probability of CD diagnosis.

摘要

背景

克罗恩病(CD)的诊断需要进行回肠结肠镜检查(IC)和横断面评估。最近,“超声内镜”在多种情况下得到了有效应用,尽管其在 CD 诊断中的应用数据仍有限。我们的目的是评估手持式肠超声(HHBS)与磁共振肠造影术(MRE)在 CD 诊断中的诊断准确性。

方法

从 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 6 月,我们前瞻性地招募了连续就诊于我们三级 IBD 专科的疑似 CD 患者。患者以随机顺序接受 IC、HHBS 和 MRE 检查,操作者对其他检查结果不知情。采用 Spearman 系数(r)计算 MRE 和 HHBS 之间的双变量相关性。为了检验 MRE 和 HHBS 在 CD 部位和并发症方面的一致性,应用 Cohen's k 测量。

结果

48 例(56%)85 例患者中确诊为 CD。HHBS 诊断 CD 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 87.50%、91.89%、93.33%和 85%;MRE 分别为 91.67%、94.59%、95.65%和 89.74%,诊断准确性无显著差异(HHBS 为 89.41%,MRE 为 92.94%,P=NS)。MRE 在定义 CD 延伸方面优于 HHBS(r=0.67;P<0.01),在定位(k=0.81;P<0.01)、狭窄(k=0.75;P<0.01)、脓肿(k=0.68;P<0.01)和瘘管(k=0.65;P<0.01)方面的诊断性能优于 HHBS。

结论

手持式肠超声和 MRE 是两种准确且非侵入性的 CD 诊断方法,尽管 MRE 在定义延伸、部位和并发症方面更敏感。由于 CD 诊断概率高,HHBS 可作为有效的门诊(或诊室外)筛查工具,用于识别需要进行 MRE 检查的患者。

相似文献

1
David Against Goliath: Direct Comparison of Handheld Bowel Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease.大卫对阵歌利亚:手持式肠道超声与磁共振肠道成像诊断克罗恩病的直接比较。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Apr 3;29(4):563-569. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac116.
2
Noninvasive diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: direct comparison of bowel sonography and magnetic resonance enterography.小肠克罗恩病的非侵入性诊断:肠道超声与磁共振肠道成像的直接比较。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Apr;19(5):991-8. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e3182802b87.
3
Comparative Accuracy of Bowel Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Combination With Colonoscopy in Assessing Crohn's Disease and Guiding Clinical Decision-making.肠超声与磁共振肠造影术联合结肠镜检查评估克罗恩病及指导临床决策的准确性比较。
J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Nov 15;12(11):1280-1287. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy093.
4
Correlation between magnetic resonance enterography and ileo-colonoscopy for assessment of disease activity in terminal ileal Crohn's disease.磁共振肠造影与回结肠镜检查评估末端回肠克罗恩病活动度的相关性。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;41(5):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01242-7. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Comparison of the use of wireless capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance enterography in children with inflammatory bowel disease.比较无线胶囊内镜与磁共振肠造影术在儿童炎症性肠病中的应用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 28;25(28):3808-3822. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3808.
6
Panenteric capsule endoscopy versus ileocolonoscopy plus magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn's disease: a multicentre, prospective study.全消化道胶囊内镜与回结肠联合磁共振肠成像在克罗恩病中的应用:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000365.
7
Diagnostic performance of sonographic activity scores for adult terminal ileal Crohn's disease compared to magnetic resonance and histological reference standards: experience from the METRIC trial.超声活动评分对成人末端回肠克罗恩病的诊断性能与磁共振和组织学参考标准比较:来自 METRIC 试验的经验。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09958-6.
8
Small intestinal contrast ultrasonography for the detection of small bowel complications in Crohn's disease: correlation with intraoperative findings and magnetic resonance enterography.小肠对比超声检查用于检测克罗恩病的小肠并发症:与术中发现及磁共振小肠造影的相关性
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;30(1):86-91. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12724.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of different cross-sectional imaging techniques for disease location and activity in Crohn's disease and external validation and comparison of MARIAs and IBUS-SAS.不同横断面成像技术对克罗恩病病变部位及活动度的诊断准确性以及MARIAs和IBUS-SAS的外部验证与比较
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Mar;48(3):821-832. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03751-7. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn's disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study.磁共振肠造影与超声检查在初诊和复发克罗恩病患者中的比较:METRIC 诊断准确性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(42):1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta23420.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal and Bowel Ultrasound Knowledge Among Young Gastroenterologists: Results of an Italian Survey.年轻胃肠病学家的腹部及肠道超声知识:一项意大利调查的结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2693. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082693.
2
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Nephropathies: Exploring the Gut-Kidney Axis.炎症性肠病与肾病:探索肠-肾轴
Life (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;14(12):1541. doi: 10.3390/life14121541.
3
Transmural cross-sectional findings and bowel damage assessment in preclinical Crohn's disease: a case-control study.临床前克罗恩病的透壁横截面研究结果及肠道损伤评估:一项病例对照研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jun 14;39(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04660-5.
4
Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Intestinal Ultrasound for the Assessment and Monitoring of Crohn's Disease.磁共振肠道成像和肠道超声用于评估和监测克罗恩病。
J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Sep 3;18(9):1450-1463. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae042.
5
Technical assessment of resolution of handheld ultrasound devices and clinical implications.手持式超声设备分辨率的技术评估及临床意义
Ultraschall Med. 2024 Aug;45(4):405-411. doi: 10.1055/a-2243-9767. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
6
Bedside Clinical Hand-held Ultrasound in an Internal Medicine Department: The "Bed Med-Us" Experience of Codogno and its Clinical Utility in the Management of Diagnosis and Therapy in 1007 Patients.内科床边临床手持式超声检查:科多尼奥的“Bed Med-Us”经验及其在1007例患者诊断和治疗管理中的临床应用
Ultrasound Int Open. 2024 Jan 5;10:a21961599. doi: 10.1055/a-2196-1599.
7
The Arrival of Intestinal Ultrasound for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care in the United States.肠道超声在美国炎症性肠病护理中的应用
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2023 Mar;19(3):147-154.
8
Intestinal ultrasound as a non-invasive tool to monitor inflammatory bowel disease activity and guide clinical decision making.肠道超声作为一种非侵入性工具,可用于监测炎症性肠病的活动并指导临床决策。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 21;29(15):2272-2282. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i15.2272.