Chung Vincent C H, Ma Polly H X, Lau Chun Hong, Wong Samuel Y S, Yeoh Eng Kiong, Griffiths Sian M
School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):622-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00794.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
Health-care professionals worldwide have started to appreciate patients' perspectives on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) particularly given its popularity. However, cultural perspectives may vary and it may not be possible to apply research findings on the use of CAM from the west to the east.
This systematic review aims to synthesize usage patterns of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) amongst Chinese populations in different parts of the world and explore potential geographical variations.
Six international and four Chinese databases were searched, and manual searches of relevant monographs and government publications were carried out.
Quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method research that aimed to investigate Chinese patients' perception of, and perspectives on, TCM was included.
For each study included, texts under the headings of 'results' or 'findings' were extracted and subjected to analysis. A thematic synthesis approach was adopted for synthesizing qualitative and quantitative studies.
Amongst the 28 studies included, twenty were quantitative surveys, six were qualitative studies and two were mixed-method studies. The overall methodological quality was mediocre. Data synthesis suggested that patients from all regions share a common cultural affinity to TCM and consider it to be an effective complement to western medicine (WM) for treating chronic or serious diseases. However, heterogeneous views on (i) disclosing TCM use to WM doctors and (ii) the potential harm of herbs emerged across different study locations.
Future research should explore how variation in health systems may influence patients' perception of CAM in different countries.
鉴于补充和替代医学(CAM)的普及,全球医疗保健专业人员已开始重视患者对其使用的看法。然而,文化观点可能存在差异,将西方关于补充和替代医学使用的研究结果应用于东方可能并不可行。
本系统评价旨在综合世界各地华人人群中使用中医(TCM)的模式,并探索潜在的地域差异。
检索了6个国际数据库和4个中文数据库,并对相关专著和政府出版物进行了手工检索。
纳入旨在调查中国患者对中医的认知和看法的定量、定性或混合方法研究。
对于每项纳入研究,提取“结果”或“发现”标题下的文本并进行分析。采用主题综合方法对定性和定量研究进行综合。
在纳入的28项研究中,20项为定量调查,6项为定性研究,2项为混合方法研究。总体方法质量一般。数据综合表明,所有地区的患者对中医都有共同的文化亲和力,并认为它是治疗慢性或严重疾病的西医(WM)的有效补充。然而,在不同的研究地点,对于(i)向西医医生披露中医的使用情况和(ii)草药的潜在危害存在不同观点。
未来的研究应探讨卫生系统的差异如何影响不同国家患者对补充和替代医学的认知。