Suppr超能文献

基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究:红细胞分布宽度、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值与重症监护患者心房颤动的关系。

Association of RDW, NLR, and PLR with Atrial Fibrillation in Critical Care Patients: A Retrospective Study Based on Propensity Score Matching.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021 Guangxi, China.

Guangxi Key Laboratory Base of Precision Medicine in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, 530021 Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Dis Markers. 2022 May 27;2022:2694499. doi: 10.1155/2022/2694499. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown inconsistent results in relation to the red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) of atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective study is aimed at detecting the association of RDW, NLR, and PLR with AF.

METHODS

A total of 4717 critical care patients were screened from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care- (MIMIC-) III database. The patients were separated into the non-AF and AF groups. The imbalances between the groups were reduced using propensity score matching (PSM). ROC curves were generated to detect the diagnostic value of RDW, NLR, and PLR. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect the risk factors for AF.

RESULTS

A total of 991 non-AF patients paired with 991 AF patients were included after PSM in this study. The RDW level in the AF group was significantly higher than that in the non-AF group (15.09 ± 1.93. 14.89 ± 1.91, = 0.017). Neither NLR nor PLR showed any significant difference between the two groups ( > 0.05 for each). According to ROC curve, RDW showed a very low diagnostic value of AF (AUC = 0.5341), and the best cutoff of RDW was 14.1 (ACU = 0.5257, sensitivity = 0.658, specificity = 0.395). Logistic regression analysis showed that an elevated RDW level increased 1.308-fold (95%CI = 1.077-1.588, = 0.007) risk of AF. Neither elevated NLR nor elevated PLR was a significant risk factor for AF (OR = 0.993, 95%CI = 0.802-1.228, = 0.945 for NLR; OR = 0.945, 95%CI = 0.763-1.170, = 0.603 for PLR).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated RDW level but not NLR or PLR levels is associated with AF. RDW > 14.1 is a risk factor for AF, but its diagnostic capacity for AF is not of great value.

摘要

目的

先前的研究表明,红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)与心房颤动(AF)的相关性结果不一致。本回顾性研究旨在检测 RDW、NLR 和 PLR 与 AF 的相关性。

方法

从 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-(MIMIC-)III 数据库中筛选出 4717 例重症监护患者。将患者分为非 AF 组和 AF 组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)降低组间不平衡性。绘制 ROC 曲线以检测 RDW、NLR 和 PLR 的诊断价值。采用 logistic 回归分析检测 AF 的危险因素。

结果

PSM 后,本研究共纳入 991 例非 AF 患者和 991 例 AF 患者。AF 组的 RDW 水平明显高于非 AF 组(15.09±1.93 比 14.89±1.91, =0.017)。NLR 和 PLR 两组间无显著差异(均>0.05)。根据 ROC 曲线,RDW 对 AF 的诊断价值较低(AUC=0.5341),RDW 的最佳截断值为 14.1(AUC=0.5257,敏感性=0.658,特异性=0.395)。logistic 回归分析显示,升高的 RDW 水平使 AF 的风险增加 1.308 倍(95%CI=1.077-1.588, =0.007)。升高的 NLR 或 PLR 均不是 AF 的显著危险因素(OR=0.993,95%CI=0.802-1.228, =0.945 对于 NLR;OR=0.945,95%CI=0.763-1.170, =0.603 对于 PLR)。

结论

升高的 RDW 水平与 AF 相关,而 NLR 或 PLR 水平升高与 AF 无关。RDW>14.1 是 AF 的危险因素,但对 AF 的诊断价值不大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b72f/9166973/8d53f3266ce3/DM2022-2694499.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验