Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Obes Rev. 2022 Sep;23(9):e13482. doi: 10.1111/obr.13482. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
To synthesize peer-reviewed literature that utilize co-creation principles in healthy food retail initiatives.
Systematic review of six databases from inception to September 2021. Screening and quality assessment were carried out by two authors independently. Studies were included if they were conducted in food retail stores, used a collaborative model, and aimed to improve the healthiness of the food retail environment. Studies excluded were implemented in restaurants, fast food chains, or similar or did not utilize some form of collaboration. Extracted data included the type of stakeholders engaged, level of engagement, stakeholder motivation, and barriers and enablers of the co-creation process.
After screening 6951 articles by title and abstract, 131 by full text, 23 manuscripts that describe 20 separate studies from six countries were included. Six were implemented in low-income communities and eight among Indigenous people groups. A common aim was to increase access to, and availability of, healthy products. A diverse range of co-creation approaches, theoretical perspectives, and study designs were observed. The three most common stakeholders involved were researchers, corporate representatives or store owners, and governments.
Some evidence exists of the benefits of co-creation to improve the healthiness of food retail environments. The field may benefit from structured guidance on the theory and practice of co-creation.
综合利用共同创造原则的同行评议文献,以促进健康食品零售计划。
对从开始到 2021 年 9 月的六个数据库进行系统回顾。两名作者独立进行筛选和质量评估。如果研究在食品零售商店进行,使用协作模式,旨在改善食品零售环境的健康状况,则纳入研究。排除在餐馆、快餐店或类似场所实施的研究,或不利用某种形式的合作的研究。提取的数据包括参与的利益相关者的类型、参与程度、利益相关者的动机,以及共同创造过程的障碍和促进因素。
通过标题和摘要筛选了 6951 篇文章,通过全文筛选了 131 篇文章,最后纳入了来自六个国家的 23 篇描述 20 项独立研究的手稿。其中 6 项在低收入社区实施,8 项在土著人群体中实施。一个共同的目标是增加获得和提供健康产品的机会。观察到了各种共同创造方法、理论观点和研究设计。涉及的三个最常见的利益相关者是研究人员、企业代表或店主以及政府。
有一些证据表明共同创造有益于改善食品零售环境的健康状况。该领域可能受益于关于共同创造的理论和实践的结构化指导。