• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

读出分段回波平面成像与二维导航校正(RESOLVE):一种改善前列腺弥散加权成像图像质量的替代序列。

Read-out Segmented Echo Planar Imaging with Two-Dimensional Navigator Correction (RESOLVE): An Alternative Sequence to Improve Image Quality on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Department of Radiology, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2022 Aug 1;95(1136):20211165. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211165. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20211165
PMID:35671135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10162059/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate if the use of read-out segmented echoplanar imaging with additional two-dimensional navigator correction (Readout Segmentation of Long Variable Echo, RESOLVE) for acquiring prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) improves image quality, compared to single-shot echoplanar imaging (ss-EPI).

METHODS

This single-center prospective study cohort included 162 males with suspected prostate cancer, who underwent 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI (3T-mpMRI). Two abdominal radiologists, blinded to the clinical information, separately reviewed each 3T-mpMRI study to rank geometrical distortion, degree of rectal distention, lesion conspicuity, and anatomic details delineation first on ss-EPI-DWI and later on RESOLVE-DWI using 5-point scales (1 = excellent, 5 = poor). The average of the ranking scores given by two readers was generated and used as the final score.

RESULTS

There was good-to-excellent interreader agreement for scoring image quality parameters on both ss-EPI and RESOLVE. Geometrical distortion scores > 3 was seen in 12.3% (20/162) of ss-EPI images, with all having geometrical distortion score <3 on RESOLVE ( < .001). The mean image distortion score was significantly less on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.16 1.61, < .01 regardless of rectal gas, .05 when stratified by the degree of rectal distention ). RESOLVE was superior to ss-EPI for lesion conspicuity (mean 1.35 1.53, .002) and anatomic delineation (2.60 2.68, .001) of prostate on DWI.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional ss-EPI, the use of RESOLVE for acquisition of prostate DWI resulted in significantly enhanced image quality and reduced geometrical distortion.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

RESOLVE could be an alternative or replacement of ss-EPI for acquiring prostate DWI with significantly less geometrical distortion and significantly improved lesion conspicuity and anatomic delineation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探究在获取前列腺扩散加权成像(DWI)时,使用带二维导航校正的分段读出回波平面成像(Readout Segmentation of Long Variable Echo,RESOLVE)是否能比单次激发回波平面成像(ss-EPI)提高图像质量。

方法

本研究纳入了 162 名疑似前列腺癌的男性患者,所有患者均接受了 3 特斯拉多参数磁共振成像(3T-mpMRI)检查。两名腹部放射科医生在不了解临床信息的情况下,分别对每位患者的 3T-mpMRI 检查结果进行评估,使用 5 分制对几何变形、直肠扩张程度、病灶显示程度和解剖细节勾画的程度进行评分(1=极好,5=极差)。两位观察者的评分平均值作为最终评分。

结果

ss-EPI 和 RESOLVE 上的图像质量参数评分具有良好到极好的观察者间一致性。ss-EPI 图像中 12.3%(20/162)的图像存在>3 分的几何变形,而所有 RESOLVE 图像的几何变形评分均<3(<0.001)。RESOLVE 的图像变形评分显著低于 ss-EPI(均<0.01,无论直肠气体情况如何;<0.05,按直肠扩张程度分层)。与 ss-EPI 相比,RESOLVE 能更清晰地显示病灶(平均评分 1.35 1.53,<0.002),且能更好地勾画前列腺的解剖结构(平均评分 2.60 2.68,<0.001)。

结论

与传统的 ss-EPI 相比,使用 RESOLVE 采集前列腺 DWI 可显著提高图像质量,减少几何变形。

知识进展

与 ss-EPI 相比,RESOLVE 采集前列腺 DWI 的几何变形更小,病灶显示程度和解剖结构勾画程度明显提高,可作为替代或补充方法。

相似文献

1
Read-out Segmented Echo Planar Imaging with Two-Dimensional Navigator Correction (RESOLVE): An Alternative Sequence to Improve Image Quality on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate.读出分段回波平面成像与二维导航校正(RESOLVE):一种改善前列腺弥散加权成像图像质量的替代序列。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Aug 1;95(1136):20211165. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211165. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in the pelvis at 3T-A feasibility study.3T下盆腔扩散加权成像的读出分段回波平面成像——一项可行性研究
Acad Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.005.
3
Feasibility Study of 3-T DWI of the Prostate: Readout-Segmented Versus Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.3T前列腺扩散加权成像的可行性研究:读出分段与单次激发回波平面成像
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):70-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13489.
4
Clinical comparison of single-shot EPI, readout-segmented EPI and TGSE-BLADE for diffusion-weighted imaging of cerebellopontine angle tumors on 3 tesla.3.0T 磁共振单次激发 EPI、分段读出 EPI 及 TGSE-BLADE 序列在桥小脑角肿瘤扩散加权成像中的临床对比研究。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Dec;84:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
5
Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Modern Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.现代磁共振前列腺弥散加权成像序列的图像质量和几何变形。
Invest Radiol. 2018 Apr;53(4):200-206. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000429.
6
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging.读出分段回波平面成像在鼻窦病变评估中的应用:单次激发回波平面成像图像质量的全面比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;34(2):166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
Comparison of DWI Methods in the Pediatric Brain: PROPELLER Turbo Spin-Echo Imaging Versus Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging Versus Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.儿童脑弥散加权成像方法的比较:螺旋桨涡轮自旋回波成像与分段读出回波平面成像与单次激发回波平面成像。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jun;210(6):1352-1358. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18796. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the image quality of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in rectal cancer: Comparison with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.读出分段回波平面成像改善直肠癌扩散加权磁共振成像的图像质量:与单次激发回波平面扩散加权序列的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1818-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
Segmented diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Application to transperineal in-bore 3T MR image-guided targeted biopsy.前列腺的分段扩散加权成像:在经会阴3T磁共振图像引导下靶向活检中的应用。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Oct;34(8):1146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Qualitative and quantitative comparison of image quality between single-shot echo-planar and interleaved multi-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in female pelvis.单次激发回波平面与交错多发回波平面扩散加权成像在女性盆腔中图像质量的定性和定量比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):1876-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06491-3. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing the image quality of prostate diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with prostate cancer through model-based deep learning reconstruction.通过基于模型的深度学习重建提高前列腺癌患者前列腺扩散加权成像的图像质量。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2024 Jul 5;13:100588. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100588. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Penile Cancer: A Pictorial Review.阴茎癌的多参数磁共振成像:图文综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 8;15(22):5324. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225324.
3
High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Prostate Using Multiplexed Sensitivity-encoding: Comparison with the Conventional and Reduced Field-of-view Techniques.使用多重灵敏度编码的前列腺高分辨率扩散加权成像:与传统和缩小视野技术的比较。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2025 Jan 1;24(1):58-65. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0039. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
4
Evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the rectal cancers: comparison between modified reduced field-of-view single-shot echo-planar imaging with tilted two-dimensional radiofrequency excitation pulses and conventional full field-of-view readout-segmented echo-planar imaging.直肠癌弥散加权磁共振成像评价:倾斜二维射频激发脉冲改良小视野单次激发回波平面成像与常规全视野读出分段回波平面成像的比较。
Radiol Med. 2023 Oct;128(10):1192-1198. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01699-2. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET.宫颈癌分期:MRI 和 FDG PET 的实用方法。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Nov;221(5):633-648. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29003. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
6
PI-RADS: Where Next?PI-RADS:下一步在哪里?
Radiology. 2023 Jun;307(5):e223128. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223128. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的弥散加权成像。
MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):533-547. doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00957-6. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
2
Advanced diffusion weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of readout-segmented multi-shot, parallel-transmit and single-shot echo-planar imaging.前列腺的高级扩散加权成像:读出分段多激发、并行发射和单激发回波平面成像的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep;130:109161. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109161. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Applicability of readout-segmented echoplanar diffusion weighted imaging for prostate MRI.读出分段回波平面扩散加权成像在前列腺MRI中的适用性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(29):e16447. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016447.
4
Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌流行病学
World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
5
Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR for the evaluation of aggressive characteristics of rectal cancer.读出分段回波平面弥散加权磁共振成像在评估直肠癌侵袭性特征中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30488-5.
6
Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.前列腺影像报告和数据系统指导委员会:PI-RADS v2 现状更新及未来方向。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):385-396. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.035. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
8
Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality.评估直肠扩张对前列腺多参数磁共振成像图像质量的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of orbital tumors: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality and diagnostic performance.读出分段回波平面扩散加权成像在眼眶肿瘤评估中的应用:与传统单次激发回波平面成像在图像质量和诊断性能方面的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2017 Dec;58(12):1457-1467. doi: 10.1177/0284185117695667. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.