Hellms Susanne, Gutberlet Marcel, Peperhove Matti Joonas, Pertschy Stefanie, Henkenberens Christoph, Peters Inga, Wacker Frank, Derlin Katja
Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology.
Institute for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(29):e16447. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016447.
To evaluate readout-segmented echoplanar (rsEPI) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate compared to the established single-shot echoplanar imaging (ssEPI) sequence.One hundred ten consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent mp prostate MRI using both, the ssEPI and the rsEPI DWI sequence. For an objective assessment, delineation of the prostate shape on both DWI sequences was compared to T2-weighted images by measuring organ diameters. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, image contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between the 2 sequences on a region-of-interest-based analysis. Diagnostic accuracy for quantitative ADC-values was calculated. Histopathology from MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy was used as reference standard. For a subjective assessment, 2 independent readers visually assessed image quality of both sequences using Likert-scales.Delineation of the prostate shape was more accurate with rsEPI compared to ssEPI. ADC values in target lesions were not significantly different but significantly higher in the surrounding normal prostatic tissue of the transition zone. CNR was comparable between ssEPI and rsEPI. Sensitivity and specificity were good for both sequences with 84/84% and 82/73% with a Youden selected cut-off of ADC = 0.97110 mm/s for rsEPI and 1.01710 mm/s for ssEPI. Anatomic artifacts were significantly less and SNR was lower on rsEPI compared to ssEPI in the subjective analysis.Delineation of the prostate shape was more accurate with rsEPI DWI than with ssEPI DWI with less anatomic artifacts and higher subjective SNR and image quality on rsEPI DW images. Diagnostic ability of quantitative ADC-values was not significantly different between the 2 sequences. Thus, rsEPI DWI might be more suitable for prostate MRI with regard to MRI-guided targeted biopsy and therapy planning.
与已确立的单次激发平面回波成像(ssEPI)序列相比,评估读出分段平面回波(rsEPI)扩散加权成像(DWI)用于前列腺多参数(mp)磁共振成像(MRI)。110例临床怀疑患有前列腺癌的连续患者接受了使用ssEPI和rsEPI DWI序列的mp前列腺MRI检查。为了进行客观评估,通过测量器官直径,将两种DWI序列上前列腺形状的描绘与T2加权图像进行比较。在基于感兴趣区域的分析中,比较了两种序列之间的表观扩散系数(ADC)值、图像对比度和对比噪声比(CNR)。计算了定量ADC值的诊断准确性。将MRI/超声融合引导活检的组织病理学用作参考标准。为了进行主观评估,两名独立的阅片者使用李克特量表对两种序列的图像质量进行视觉评估。与ssEPI相比,rsEPI对前列腺形状的描绘更准确。靶病变中的ADC值无显著差异,但在移行区周围正常前列腺组织中的ADC值显著更高。ssEPI和rsEPI之间的CNR相当。两种序列的敏感性和特异性都很好,rsEPI的ADC = 0.971×10⁻³mm²/s和ssEPI的ADC = 1.017×10⁻³mm²/s的约登指数选定截断值时,敏感性和特异性分别为84/84%和82/73%。在主观分析中,与ssEPI相比,rsEPI上的解剖伪影明显更少,SNR更低。rsEPI DWI对前列腺形状的描绘比ssEPI DWI更准确,rsEPI DW图像上的解剖伪影更少,主观SNR和图像质量更高。两种序列之间定量ADC值的诊断能力无显著差异。因此,就MRI引导的靶向活检和治疗计划而言,rsEPI DWI可能更适合前列腺MRI。