Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30488-5.
To evaluate whether aggressive characteristics of rectal cancer can be predicted by the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance. We enrolled one hundred and fifteen patients. The image quality of ADC maps by rs-EPI was compared with that by traditional single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI), and ADC measurement was performed on the rs-EPI based ADC maps. Differences in ADC values of tumors grouped according to differentiation grade, clinical T stage and plasmatic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level were tested. The correlation between each aggressive characteristic and the corresponding ADC values was evaluated. The image quality of ADC maps obtained by rs-EPI was superior toss-EPI (P < 0.05). The ADC values of tumor were categorized based on the following differentiation grades: poor (0.89 ± 0.12 × 10 mm/s), moderate (1.13 ± 0.25 × 10 mm/s), and good (1.31 ± 0.19 × 10 mm/s); P < 0.001. Tumors with lower differentiation grades corresponded to lower ADC values (r = 0.59, P < 0.001). However, ADC differences were not observed in different clinical T stage (P = 0.22) and plasmatic CEA level (P = 0.38). Rs-EPI sequence-based ADC values represent a potential imaging marker for the aggressive rectal cancer characteristics.
为了评估在直肠癌中,利用读出分段回波平面成像(rs-EPI)弥散加权磁共振成像得到的表观弥散系数(ADC)能否预测肿瘤的侵袭性特征,我们招募了 115 名患者。对比 rs-EPI 和传统单次激发回波平面成像(ss-EPI)得到的 ADC 图的图像质量,并在 rs-EPI 基础上的 ADC 图上进行 ADC 测量。对按分化程度、临床 T 分期和血浆癌胚抗原(CEA)水平分组的肿瘤的 ADC 值差异进行了检验。评估了每个侵袭性特征与相应 ADC 值之间的相关性。rs-EPI 得到的 ADC 图的图像质量优于 ss-EPI(P<0.05)。肿瘤的 ADC 值按以下分化程度分类:差(0.89±0.12×10 mm/s)、中(1.13±0.25×10 mm/s)和高(1.31±0.19×10 mm/s);P<0.001。分化程度越低的肿瘤对应越低的 ADC 值(r=0.59,P<0.001)。然而,在不同的临床 T 分期(P=0.22)和血浆 CEA 水平(P=0.38)之间并未观察到 ADC 差异。rs-EPI 序列 ADC 值代表了直肠癌侵袭性特征的一种潜在的影像学标志物。