• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能机器人用于老年人认知功能保健的效果:系统评价与Meta分析

The Effect of Cognitive Function Health Care Using Artificial Intelligence Robots for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lee Hocheol, Chung Min Ah, Kim Hyeji, Nam Eun Woo

机构信息

Healthy City Research Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

Yonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2022 Jun 28;5(2):e38896. doi: 10.2196/38896.

DOI:10.2196/38896
PMID:35672268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9277531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With rapidly aging populations in most parts of the world, it is only natural that the need for caregivers for older adults is going to increase in the near future. Therefore, most technologically proficient countries are in the process of using artificial intelligence (AI) to build socially assistive robots (SAR) to play the role of caregivers in enhancing interaction and social participation among older adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effect of intervention through AI SAR on the cognitive function of older adults through a systematic literature review.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of the various existing studies on the effect of AI SAR on the cognitive function of older adults to standardize the results and clarify the effect of each method and indicator. Cochrane collaboration and the systematic literature review flow of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) were used on original, peer-reviewed studies published from January 2010 to March 2022. The search words were derived by combining keywords including Population, Intervention, and Outcome-according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time, Setting, and Study Design principle-for the question "What is the effect of AI SAR on the cognitive function of older adults in comparison with a control group?" (Population: adults aged ≥65 years; Intervention: AI SAR; Comparison: comparison group; Outcome: popular function; and Study Design: prospective study). For any study, if one condition among subjects, intervention, comparison, or study design was different from those indicated, the study was excluded from the literature review.

RESULTS

In total, 9 studies were selected (6 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasi-experimental design studies) for the meta-analysis. Publication bias was examined using the contour-enhanced funnel plot method to confirm the reliability and validity of the 9 studies. The meta-analysis revealed that the average effect size of AI SAR was shown to be Hedges g=0.43 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.90), indicating that AI SAR are effective in reducing the Mini Mental State Examination scale, which reflects cognitive function.

CONCLUSIONS

The 9 studies that were analyzed used SAR in the form of animals, robots, and humans. Among them, AI SAR in anthropomorphic form were able to improve cognitive function more effectively. The development and expansion of AI SAR programs to various functions including health notification, play therapy, counseling service, conversation, and dementia prevention programs are expected to improve the quality of care for older adults and prevent the overload of caregivers. AI SAR can be considered a representative, digital, and social prescription program and a nonpharmacological intervention program that communicates with older adults 24 hours a day. Despite its effectiveness, ethical issues, the digital literacy needs of older adults, social awareness and reliability, and technological advancement pose challenges in implementing AI SAR. Future research should include bigger sample sizes, pre-post studies, as well as studies using an older adult control group.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/9a4a6c2f7369/aging_v5i2e38896_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/d14efebcedfd/aging_v5i2e38896_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/4149be992cde/aging_v5i2e38896_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/a23e375ff65b/aging_v5i2e38896_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/9a4a6c2f7369/aging_v5i2e38896_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/d14efebcedfd/aging_v5i2e38896_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/4149be992cde/aging_v5i2e38896_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/a23e375ff65b/aging_v5i2e38896_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2435/9277531/9a4a6c2f7369/aging_v5i2e38896_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

随着世界上大多数地区人口迅速老龄化,在不久的将来,对老年人护理人员的需求增加是很自然的。因此,大多数技术熟练的国家正在利用人工智能(AI)制造社会辅助机器人(SAR),以在增强老年人互动和社会参与方面发挥护理人员的作用。

目的

本研究旨在通过系统的文献综述,探讨通过人工智能社会辅助机器人进行干预对老年人认知功能的影响。

方法

我们对现有的关于人工智能社会辅助机器人对老年人认知功能影响的各种研究进行了荟萃分析,以规范结果并阐明每种方法和指标的效果。对2010年1月至2022年3月发表的原始的、经过同行评审的研究,使用Cochrane协作网和PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析优先报告项目)的系统文献综述流程。根据人群、干预、对照、结局、时间、地点和研究设计原则,通过组合包括人群、干预和结局等关键词,得出搜索词,用于回答“与对照组相比,人工智能社会辅助机器人对老年人认知功能有什么影响?”这个问题(人群:年龄≥65岁的成年人;干预:人工智能社会辅助机器人;对照:对照组;结局:认知功能;研究设计:前瞻性研究)。对于任何研究,如果受试者、干预、对照或研究设计中的一个条件与所指出的不同,则该研究被排除在文献综述之外。

结果

总共选择了9项研究(6项随机对照试验和3项准实验设计研究)进行荟萃分析。使用等高线增强漏斗图法检查发表偏倚,以确认这9项研究的可靠性和有效性。荟萃分析显示,人工智能社会辅助机器人的平均效应大小为Hedges g = 0.43(95%CI -0.04至0.90),表明人工智能社会辅助机器人在降低反映认知功能的简易精神状态检查表得分方面是有效的。

结论

所分析的9项研究使用了动物、机器人和人类形式的社会辅助机器人。其中,拟人形式的人工智能社会辅助机器人能够更有效地改善认知功能。预计将人工智能社会辅助机器人程序开发和扩展到包括健康通知、游戏治疗、咨询服务、对话和痴呆预防项目等各种功能,可以提高老年人的护理质量并防止护理人员负担过重。人工智能社会辅助机器人可以被视为一种代表性的、数字化的和社会处方程序以及一种每天24小时与老年人交流的非药物干预程序。尽管其有效,但伦理问题、老年人的数字素养需求、社会意识和可靠性以及技术进步在实施人工智能社会辅助机器人方面带来了挑战。未来的研究应包括更大的样本量、前后对照研究以及使用老年对照组的研究。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Cognitive Function Health Care Using Artificial Intelligence Robots for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能机器人用于老年人认知功能保健的效果:系统评价与Meta分析
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jun 28;5(2):e38896. doi: 10.2196/38896.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
5
6
Effects of Electronic Serious Games on Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.电子严肃游戏对患有阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的老年人的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Jul 31;12:e55785. doi: 10.2196/55785.
7
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
"Are we ready for robots that care for us?" Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots.“我们准备好迎接照顾我们的机器人了吗?”老年人对社交辅助机器人的态度和看法。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;7:141. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141. eCollection 2015.
9
10
Exploring the impact of socially assistive robots on health and wellbeing across the lifespan: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.探讨社交辅助机器人在整个生命周期中对健康和幸福的影响:伞式综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104730. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Beneficial effect of artificial intelligence care call on memory and depression in community dwelling individuals with dementia.人工智能关怀呼叫对社区痴呆患者记忆力和抑郁的有益影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 25;15(1):27116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12895-7.
2
Virtual humans in geriatric care: an integrative review.老年护理中的虚拟人:一项综合综述。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Aug 23;80(9). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf145.
3
Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.生成式人工智能时代的医疗保健社交机器人:一项范围综述的方案

本文引用的文献

1
The Humanoid Robot Sil-Bot in a Cognitive Training Program for Community-Dwelling Elderly People with Mild Cognitive Impairment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.《COVID-19 大流行期间,针对社区居住的轻度认知障碍老年人的认知训练计划中的仿人机器人 Sil-Bot:一项随机对照试验》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 3;18(15):8198. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158198.
2
Cognitive Intervention Through Photo-Integrated Conversation Moderated by Robots (PICMOR) Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.通过机器人主持的照片整合对话进行认知干预(PICMOR)计划:一项随机对照试验。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Apr 12;8:633076. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.633076. eCollection 2021.
3
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 14;14:e63017. doi: 10.2196/63017.
4
Perspectives on AI and Novel Technologies Among Older Adults, Clinicians, Payers, Investors, and Developers.老年人、临床医生、支付方、投资者和开发者对人工智能及新兴技术的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3316.
5
Integrating AI and Assistive Technologies in Healthcare: Insights from a Narrative Review of Reviews.将人工智能与辅助技术整合于医疗保健领域:基于综述之综述的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;13(5):556. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050556.
6
Assessment of Digital Capabilities by 9 Countries in the Alliance for Healthy Cities Using AI: Cross-Sectional Analysis.9个健康城市联盟国家利用人工智能对数字能力的评估:横断面分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 7;9:e62935. doi: 10.2196/62935.
7
The PDC30 Chatbot-Development of a Psychoeducational Resource on Dementia Caregiving Among Family Caregivers: Mixed Methods Acceptability Study.PDC30聊天机器人——家庭照顾者痴呆症护理心理教育资源的开发:混合方法可接受性研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jan 6;8:e63715. doi: 10.2196/63715.
8
Home-Based Cognitive Intervention for Healthy Older Adults Through Asking Robots Questions: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于家庭的认知干预对健康老年人通过向机器人提问:随机对照试验。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 22;7:e47229. doi: 10.2196/47229.
9
Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review.数字辅助技术对痴呆症患者生活质量的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 10;14(2):e080545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080545.
Opportunities and Challenges for Digital Social Prescribing in Mental Health: Questionnaire Study.
数字社会处方在精神健康领域的机遇与挑战:问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 9;23(3):e17438. doi: 10.2196/17438.
4
How do "robopets" impact the health and well-being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.“机器宠物”如何影响养老院居民的健康和幸福感?定性和定量证据的系统评价。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2019 Sep;14(3):e12239. doi: 10.1111/opn.12239. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Nursing and Rehabilitative Care of the Elderly Using Humanoid Robots.使用类人机器人对老年人进行护理和康复护理
J Med Invest. 2019;66(1.2):19-23. doi: 10.2152/jmi.66.19.
6
Social prescribing.社会处方
BMJ. 2019 Mar 28;364:l1285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1285.
7
Pet robot intervention for people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.宠物机器人干预对痴呆症患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:516-525. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.032. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Social Robots for People with Aging and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Literature.面向老年人和痴呆症患者的社交机器人:文献系统综述
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):533-540. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0051. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
9
The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.社交机器人对老年人的有效性:随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e37-e51. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny046.
10
Effect of a robotic seal on the motor activity and sleep patterns of older people with dementia, as measured by wearable technology: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.可穿戴技术测量的机器海豹对痴呆老年人运动活动和睡眠模式的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Maturitas. 2018 Apr;110:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 13.