• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表:具有临床意义的变化估计值。

Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale: Clinically meaningful change estimates.

作者信息

Wessels Alette M, Rentz Dorene M, Case Michael, Lauzon Steve, Sims John R

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis Indiana USA.

Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Jun 6;8(1):e12312. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12312. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1002/trc2.12312
PMID:35676941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9169866/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) has been used to detect differences in disease progression in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objectives of this study were to enhance understanding of iADRS point changes within the context of clinical trials, and to establish a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the iADRS.

METHODS

Data from AMARANTH and EXPEDITION3 were analyzed using various approaches, including anchor-based, distribution-based, regression analyses, and cumulative distribution function (CDF) plots. Three potential anchors were examined, including the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Functional Activities Questionnaire. Triangulation of all results was used to determine the MCID for participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD and AD with mild dementia.

RESULTS

All three anchors met criteria for "sufficiently associated" (|r| = 0.4-0.7). Cumulatively, results from anchor-based and distribution-based results converged to suggest an iADRS MCID of 5 points for MCI due to AD and 9 points for AD with mild dementia. Regression analyses and CDF plots supported these values.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest the iADRS can be used in clinical trials to detect a clinically meaningful outcome of AD progression.

摘要

引言

综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表(iADRS)已被用于检测早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)疾病进展的差异。本研究的目的是在临床试验背景下加深对iADRS评分变化的理解,并确定iADRS的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

方法

使用多种方法分析了来自AMARANTH和EXPEDITION3的数据,包括基于锚定法、基于分布法、回归分析和累积分布函数(CDF)图。研究了三个潜在的锚定指标,包括临床痴呆评定量表-方框总和、简易精神状态检查表和功能活动问卷。所有结果的三角测量法用于确定因AD导致轻度认知障碍(MCI)的参与者以及患有轻度痴呆的AD患者的MCID。

结果

所有三个锚定指标均符合“充分相关”标准(|r| = 0.4 - 0.7)。总体而言,基于锚定法和基于分布法的结果趋于一致,表明因AD导致MCI的iADRS MCID为5分,患有轻度痴呆的AD患者为9分。回归分析和CDF图支持这些值。

讨论

这些发现表明iADRS可用于临床试验,以检测AD进展的具有临床意义的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0e0/9169866/086e8be43522/TRC2-8-e12312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0e0/9169866/086e8be43522/TRC2-8-e12312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0e0/9169866/086e8be43522/TRC2-8-e12312-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale: Clinically meaningful change estimates.综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表:具有临床意义的变化估计值。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Jun 6;8(1):e12312. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12312. eCollection 2022.
2
Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review.阿尔茨海默病的最小临床重要差异:快速综述。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3352-3363. doi: 10.1002/alz.13770. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Disease progression model using the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale.采用整合阿尔茨海默病评定量表的疾病进展模型。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Jun;19(6):2253-2264. doi: 10.1002/alz.12876. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
4
Demonstration of Clinical Meaningfulness of the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS): Association Between Change in iADRS Scores and Patient and Caregiver Health Outcomes.展示综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表(iADRS)的临床意义:iADRS 评分变化与患者和照护者健康结局的相关性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;88(2):577-588. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220303.
5
Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease.用于早期阿尔茨海默病试验的临床痴呆评定量表-框总数的照顾者知情有意义的变化阈值。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):5889-5900. doi: 10.1002/alz.14050. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Disease severity and minimal clinically important differences in clinical outcome assessments for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.阿尔茨海默病临床试验临床结局评估中的疾病严重程度及最小临床重要差异
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Aug 2;5:354-363. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.06.005. eCollection 2019.
7
The Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Findings from the EXPEDITION3 Trial.EXPEDITION3 试验中的综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表(iADRS)研究结果。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(2):134-136. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.10.
8
Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool.评估阿尔茨海默病综合评分(ADCOMS)工具的临床意义。
Neurol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1085-1100. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00352-w. Epub 2022 May 5.
9
Clinical importance in Alzheimer's disease: effects of anchor agreement and disease severity.阿尔茨海默病中的临床重要性:锚定一致性和疾病严重程度的影响。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Jan 24;36(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02643-0.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing MCID for evaluating clinical relevance of AD therapeutic interventions.利用最小临床重要差异评估阿尔茨海默病治疗干预措施的临床相关性。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Aug 4;11(3):e70138. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70138. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Extension and external validation of mapping between the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale in patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者简易精神状态检查表与临床痴呆评定量表之间映射关系的扩展及外部验证
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jun;21(6):e70163. doi: 10.1002/alz.70163.
3
Clinical evaluation of medicines for patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. Reply.多奈单抗用于早期阿尔茨海默病。回复。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):667. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2109455.
2
Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease.多奈单抗用于早期阿尔茨海默病
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1691-1704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100708. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes and Other Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in a Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Population.临床痴呆评定量表-框总和及其它认知和功能结局在前驱期阿尔茨海默病人群中的心理测量特性。
日本针对轻度认知障碍及阿尔茨海默病所致轻度痴呆患者的药物临床评估
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 13;11(2):e70100. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70100. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
Clinical Meaningfulness in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials. A Report from the EU-US CTAD Task Force.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的临床意义。来自欧盟-美国 CTAD 工作组的报告。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(5):1219-1227. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.112.
5
Progress in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Is Needed - Position Statement of European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) Investigators.需要在阿尔茨海默病治疗方面取得进展——欧洲阿尔茨海默病联合会(EADC)研究人员的立场声明。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.153.
6
What's in It for Me? Contextualizing the Potential Clinical Impacts of Lecanemab, Donanemab, and Other Anti-β-amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies in Early Alzheimer's Disease.对我有什么好处?在早期阿尔茨海默病中,情境化评估 LeCanemab、Donanemab 和其他抗β-淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体的潜在临床影响。
eNeuro. 2024 Sep 27;11(9). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0088-24.2024. Print 2024 Sep.
7
Alzheimer's disease: a review on the current trends of the effective diagnosis and therapeutics.阿尔茨海默病:有效诊断与治疗的当前趋势综述
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Aug 9;16:1429211. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1429211. eCollection 2024.
8
Lecanemab and Donanemab as Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease: An Illustrated Perspective on the Data.莱卡奈单抗和多奈单抗治疗阿尔茨海默病:数据的图解视角
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 1;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0319-23.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
9
Patient-centered development of clinical outcome assessments in early Parkinson disease: key priorities and advances.早期帕金森病以患者为中心的临床结局评估发展:关键优先事项与进展
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 May 14;10(1):101. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00716-z.
10
Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review.阿尔茨海默病的最小临床重要差异:快速综述。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3352-3363. doi: 10.1002/alz.13770. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):151-160. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2020.73.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Lanabecestat for Treatment of Early and Mild Alzheimer Disease: The AMARANTH and DAYBREAK-ALZ Randomized Clinical Trials.Lanabecestat 治疗早期和轻度阿尔茨海默病的疗效和安全性:AMARANTH 和 DAYBREAK-ALZ 随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):199-209. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3988.
5
Disease severity and minimal clinically important differences in clinical outcome assessments for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.阿尔茨海默病临床试验临床结局评估中的疾病严重程度及最小临床重要差异
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Aug 2;5:354-363. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.06.005. eCollection 2019.
6
Determining clinically meaningful decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease.在临床前阿尔茨海默病中确定有临床意义的下降。
Neurology. 2019 Jul 23;93(4):e322-e333. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007831. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
7
Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments.解读患者报告结局量表得分的变化
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jan;50(1):22-29. doi: 10.1177/2168479015622667.
8
The Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Findings from the EXPEDITION3 Trial.EXPEDITION3 试验中的综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表(iADRS)研究结果。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(2):134-136. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.10.
9
Detecting Treatment Group Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials: A Comparison of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB).阿尔茨海默病临床试验中治疗组差异的检测:阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)与临床痴呆评定量表-总盒分(CDR-SB)的比较。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(1):15-20. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.2.
10
Trial of Solanezumab for Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease.用于阿尔茨海默病所致轻度痴呆的 Solanezumab 试验。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 25;378(4):321-330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705971.