Zapata-Ospina Juan Pablo, Patiño-Lugo Daniel Felipe, Ramírez-Pérez Paola Andrea, Marín-Orozco Isabel Cristina, Velásquez-Salazar Pamela, Vélez-Marín Viviana María, García-Arias David
Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Unidad de evidencia y deliberación para la toma de decisiones Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia Unidad de evidencia y deliberación para la toma de decisiones, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Jun 3;46:e45. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.45. eCollection 2022.
To contextualize a synthesis of evidence on interventions in student mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic through a deliberative dialogue with Ibero-American universities.
An evidence synthesis and synchronous dialogues were previously conducted, consisting of subgroup discussions about the design and implementation of mental health interventions. An analysis of dialogic data was conducted, then organized by topic.
Fifty-seven representatives of 17 public and private Ibero-American universities participated in the meeting. In terms of the design of interventions, mental health is perceived as neglected, although its profile was raised by the pandemic. Interventions are guided by detection of needs; scientific evidence is rarely used to design them. Importance was given to forming an interdisciplinary team with continuous training in order to design a specific program that also covers families and teaching/administrative staff. In terms of implementation, problems include saturation of services due to high demand and lack of basic resources among students. Regarding the provision of resources, the influence of the broader context, including the institutional context, is undeniable. The dialogues were perceived as an opportunity to build a new set of interventions.
These dialogues enriched the description of interventions already described in the literature on student mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, implementing such interventions in the region means addressing previous neglect and a high level of unmet basic needs.
通过与伊比利亚美洲大学进行审议性对话,将关于新冠疫情期间学生心理健康干预措施的证据综合置于具体情境中。
此前进行了证据综合和同步对话,包括关于心理健康干预措施设计与实施的小组讨论。对对话数据进行了分析,然后按主题进行了整理。
17所伊比利亚美洲公立和私立大学的57名代表参加了会议。在干预措施的设计方面,心理健康虽因疫情受到更多关注,但仍被视为受到忽视。干预措施以需求检测为导向;很少使用科学证据来设计这些措施。组建一个接受持续培训的跨学科团队很重要,以便设计一个涵盖家庭以及教学/行政人员的特定项目。在实施方面,问题包括因需求高导致服务饱和以及学生缺乏基本资源。在资源提供方面,包括机构背景在内的更广泛背景的影响不可否认。这些对话被视为构建一套新干预措施的契机。
这些对话丰富了新冠疫情期间学生心理健康文献中已描述的干预措施的描述。然而在该地区实施此类干预措施意味着要解决此前的忽视问题以及大量未满足的基本需求。