• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导联1比率:一种用于心脏再同步治疗反应的新型心电图标志物。

Lead one ratio: A new electrocardiogram marker for cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

作者信息

Raj Ajay, Nath Ranjit Kumar, Pandit Bhagya Narayan, Singh Ajay Pratap, Pandit Neeraj, Aggarwal Puneet

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences AND Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Resident, Department of Cardiology, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences AND Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

ARYA Atheroscler. 2021 Sep;17(5):1-8. doi: 10.22122/arya.v17i0.2247.

DOI:10.22122/arya.v17i0.2247
PMID:35686239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9137223/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wider QRS duration and presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) predict better cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. Despite strict patient selection, one-third of patients have a sub-optimal response. We aim to evaluate the impact of lead one ratio (LOR) on CRT response.

METHODS

We enrolled 93 patients receiving CRT from August 2016 to August 2019. Pre-implant 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded, and LOR was derived by dividing the maximum positive deflection of QRS complex in ECG lead I by the maximum negative deflection in lead I; cut-off value of 12 was used to divide the cohort into two groups. Patients were followed for 6 months, and outcomes were compared for CRT response, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improvement, all-cause mortality, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization events.

RESULTS

At the end of 6-month follow-up, LOR ≥ 12 was associated with significantly better CRT response (75.76% vs. 51.85% in LOR < 12, P = 0.02), lower mortality per 100 patient-years (9.09 vs. 14.81 in LOR < 12, P = 0.012), and more improvement in HF symptoms (NYHA improvement) (78.79% vs. 55.56% in LOR < 12, P = 0.02). Patients with LOR < 12 had more HF hospitalization events (2.04 vs. 1.81 episodes in LOR ≥ 12, P = 0.029) and less QRS narrowing (∆5.74 ± 2.09 vs. ∆7.10 ± 3.97 ms in LOR ≥ 12, P = 0.01). QRS duration and LBBB morphology were predictors of response in both groups of patients.

CONCLUSION

LOR ≥ 12 was associated with better response to CRT, less HF hospitalization, and more relief in HF symptoms. This ratio helps to identify possible sub-optimal response among patients with an indication for CRT.

摘要

背景

更宽的QRS波时限和左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的存在预示着心脏再同步治疗(CRT)反应更好。尽管进行了严格的患者选择,但仍有三分之一的患者反应欠佳。我们旨在评估导联一比(LOR)对CRT反应的影响。

方法

我们纳入了2016年8月至2019年8月期间接受CRT治疗的93例患者。记录植入前的12导联心电图(ECG),通过将ECG导联I中QRS波群的最大正偏转除以导联I中的最大负偏转得出LOR;使用截断值12将队列分为两组。对患者进行6个月的随访,并比较CRT反应、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级改善情况、全因死亡率和心力衰竭(HF)住院事件等结果。

结果

在6个月随访结束时,LOR≥12与显著更好的CRT反应相关(LOR≥12组为75.76%,LOR<12组为51.85%,P = 0.02),每100患者年更低的死亡率(LOR<12组为9.0⑨,LOR≥12组为14.81,P = 0.012),以及HF症状(NYHA分级改善)更多的改善(LOR<12组为55.56%,LOR≥12组为78.79%,P = 0.02)。LOR<12的患者有更多的HF住院事件(LOR≥12组为1.81次发作,LOR<12组为2.04次发作,P = 0.⑩9),且QRS波变窄更少(LOR≥12组为∆7.10±3.9⑦ms,LOR<12组为∆5.74±2.0⑨ms,P = 0.01)。QRS波时限和LBBB形态是两组患者反应的预测因素。

结论

LOR≥12与更好的CRT反应、更少的HF住院以及更多的HF症状缓解相关。该比值有助于识别有CRT指征患者中可能的欠佳反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/9137223/ecabcfc24b63/ARYA-17-6-2247f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/9137223/c3d2c9173fb5/ARYA-17-6-2247f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/9137223/ecabcfc24b63/ARYA-17-6-2247f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/9137223/c3d2c9173fb5/ARYA-17-6-2247f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/9137223/ecabcfc24b63/ARYA-17-6-2247f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Lead one ratio: A new electrocardiogram marker for cardiac resynchronization therapy response.导联1比率:一种用于心脏再同步治疗反应的新型心电图标志物。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2021 Sep;17(5):1-8. doi: 10.22122/arya.v17i0.2247.
2
Lead one ratio in left bundle branch block predicts poor cardiac resynchronization therapy response.左束支传导阻滞中 1 个导联预测心脏再同步治疗反应不良。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 May;43(5):503-510. doi: 10.1111/pace.13916. Epub 2020 May 8.
3
Relation of QRS Duration to Clinical Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients Without Left Bundle Branch Block: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Substudy.无左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者中QRS时限与心脏再同步治疗临床获益的关系:心脏再同步治疗多中心自动除颤器植入试验子研究
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002667.
4
New York Heart Association functional class, QRS duration, and survival in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications for cardiac resychronization therapy.纽约心脏协会功能分级、QRS 持续时间与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的生存:心脏再同步治疗的意义。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):366-376. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.563. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Influence of QRS duration and axis on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A single center study including patients with left bundle branch block.QRS波时限和电轴对左心室射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗反应的影响:一项纳入左束支传导阻滞患者的单中心研究
Cardiol J. 2020;27(5):575-582. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0138. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.QRS 面积是心脏再同步治疗结局的重要决定因素。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;11(12):e006497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006497.
7
Role of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic types of left bundle branch block in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心电图和超声心动图类型的左束支传导阻滞在预测心脏再同步治疗反应中的作用。
Ter Arkh. 2018 Dec 30;90(12):76-83. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2018.12.000012.
8
Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.真性左束支传导阻滞患者经左束支区域起搏实现心脏再同步治疗的显著疗效。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1460-1468. doi: 10.1002/clc.23462. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
QRS duration, bundle-branch block morphology, and outcomes among older patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.QRS 时限、束支传导阻滞形态与心力衰竭老年患者心脏再同步治疗的结局
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):617-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8641.
10
Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Use of strict left bundle branch block criteria.预测心脏再同步治疗的反应:严格左束支传导阻滞标准的应用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;42(4):431-438. doi: 10.1111/pace.13638. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Preimplantation interlead ECG heterogeneity is superior to QRS complex duration in predicting mechanical super-response in patients with non-left bundle branch block receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.胚胎期心内电图异质性优于 QRS 波群持续时间,可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者接受心脏再同步治疗后的机械超反应。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1887-1896. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Combination of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter and QRS Duration Strongly Predicts Good Response to and Prognosis of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.左心室舒张末期直径与QRS时限的联合指标能强烈预测心脏再同步治疗的良好反应及预后。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Jan 17;2020:1257578. doi: 10.1155/2020/1257578. eCollection 2020.
3
Validation of Three European Risk Scores to Predict Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asian Population.验证三种欧洲风险评分在亚洲人群接受心脏再同步治疗患者中的长期预后预测能力。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2021 Aug;14(4):754-760. doi: 10.1007/s12265-020-09999-y. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
Lead one ratio in left bundle branch block predicts poor cardiac resynchronization therapy response.左束支传导阻滞中 1 个导联预测心脏再同步治疗反应不良。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 May;43(5):503-510. doi: 10.1111/pace.13916. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
An S wave in ECG lead V predicts poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and long-term outcome.心电图导联 V 中的 S 波预示着对心脏再同步治疗的反应不佳和长期预后不良。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Feb;17(2):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Low lead one ratio predicts clinical outcomes in left bundle branch block.低 Lead1 比值可预测左束支传导阻滞的临床转归。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 May;30(5):709-716. doi: 10.1111/jce.13875. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.QRS 面积是心脏再同步治疗结局的重要决定因素。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;11(12):e006497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006497.
8
Baseline Prolonged PR Interval and Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基线PR间期延长与心脏再同步治疗的结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Nov;111(5):710-719. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180198. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗特别工作组。由ESC心力衰竭协会(HFA)特别贡献制定。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with postero-lateral scar by cardiac magnetic resonance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏磁共振成像评估后外侧瘢痕患者的心脏再同步治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;48(5):783-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 19.