Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚第一、二、三波 COVID-19 大流行期间 ICU 中 COVID-19 患者的人口统计学和临床特征。

People in intensive care with COVID-19: demographic and clinical features during the first, second, and third pandemic waves in Australia.

机构信息

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2022 Oct 3;217(7):352-360. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51590. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the demographic and clinical features, management, and outcomes for patients admitted with COVID-19 to intensive care units (ICUs) during the first, second, and third waves of the pandemic in Australia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: People aged 16 years or more admitted with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 to the 78 Australian ICUs participating in the Short Period Incidence Study of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SPRINT-SARI) Australia project during the first (27 February - 30 June 2020), second (1 July 2020 - 25 June 2021), and third COVID-19 waves (26 June - 1 November 2021).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

ICU mortality; ICU and hospital lengths of stay; supportive and disease-specific therapies.

RESULTS

2493 people (1535 men, 62%) were admitted to 59 ICUs: 214 during the first (9%), 296 during the second (12%), and 1983 during the third wave (80%). The median age was 64 (IQR, 54-72) years during the first wave, 58 (IQR, 49-68) years during the second, and 54 (IQR, 41-65) years during the third. The proportion without co-existing illnesses was largest during the third wave (41%; first wave, 32%; second wave, 29%). The proportion of ICU beds occupied by patients with COVID-19 was 2.8% (95% CI, 2.7-2.9%) during the first, 4.6% (95% CI, 4.3-5.1%) during the second, and 19.1% (95% CI, 17.9-20.2%) during the third wave. Non-invasive (42% v 15%) and prone ventilation strategies (63% v 15%) were used more frequently during the third wave than during the first two waves. Thirty patients (14%) died in hospital during the first wave, 35 (12%) during the second, and 281 (17%) during the third. After adjusting for age, illness severity, and other covariates, the risk of in-hospital mortality was similar for the first and second waves, but 9.60 (95% CI, 3.52-16.7) percentage points higher during the third than the first wave.

CONCLUSION

The demographic characteristics of patients in intensive care with COVID-19 and the treatments they received during the third pandemic wave differed from those of the first two waves. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was highest during the third wave.

摘要

目的

比较澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行第一、二、三波期间,入住重症监护病房(ICU)的 COVID-19 患者的人口统计学和临床特征、治疗方法和结局。

设计、地点和参与者:年龄在 16 岁及以上的患者,经聚合酶链反应确诊为 COVID-19,入住参与澳大利亚短期严重急性呼吸道感染(SPRINT-SARI)研究的 78 家澳大利亚 ICU 之一,该研究于 COVID-19 大流行第一波(2020 年 2 月 27 日至 6 月 30 日)、第二波(2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 25 日)和第三波(2021 年 6 月 26 日至 11 月 1 日)期间进行。

主要结局指标

院内死亡率。

次要结局指标

ICU 死亡率;ICU 和住院时间;支持性和疾病特异性治疗。

结果

共有 2493 人(1535 名男性,62%)入住 59 家 ICU:第一波 214 人(9%),第二波 296 人(12%),第三波 1983 人(80%)。第一波的中位年龄为 64(IQR,54-72)岁,第二波为 58(IQR,49-68)岁,第三波为 54(IQR,41-65)岁。在第三波中,无合并症的患者比例最大(41%;第一波为 32%;第二波为 29%)。COVID-19 患者占用的 ICU 床位比例在第一波为 2.8%(95%CI,2.7-2.9%),第二波为 4.6%(95%CI,4.3-5.1%),第三波为 19.1%(95%CI,17.9-20.2%)。与前两波相比,第三波更常使用无创(42%比 15%)和俯卧位通气策略(63%比 15%)。第一波住院死亡 30 例(14%),第二波死亡 35 例(12%),第三波死亡 281 例(17%)。在校正年龄、疾病严重程度和其他协变量后,第一波和第二波的院内死亡率风险相似,但第三波比第一波高 9.60(95%CI,3.52-16.7)个百分点。

结论

COVID-19 患者入住 ICU 的人口统计学特征和接受的治疗在第三波大流行期间与前两波不同。调整后的院内死亡率在第三波最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43d8/9347520/5a48a1f2decf/MJA2-9999-0-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验