• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的无创评估。

Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adults.

作者信息

Nitta M, Nakamura T, Hultgren H N, Bilisoly J, Marquess B

出版信息

Chest. 1987 May;91(5):682-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.5.682.

DOI:10.1378/chest.91.5.682
PMID:3568771
Abstract

A noninvasive point score system for the evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS) was employed in a prospective study of 153 patients (mean age 64.8 +/- 0.8 years) referred from invasive studies or for the evaluation of a systolic murmur. Seven variables were recorded and scored as follows: LVH by ECG (0-2); aortic valve calcium by chest x-ray film (0-2); loudness of A2 (0-2); Q-peak of murmur (0-3); T-time of carotid pulse (0-3); ejection time (0-3); and LVH by echo (0-1). Range of the total score was 0-16. All patients had the aortic valve area (AVA) determined by cardiac catheterization. Data analysis revealed that the relation between the total score and the AVA was curvilinear with a score greater than or equal to 5 correctly identifying 100/107 (93 percent) of patients with a valve area of less than or equal to 1.0 cm2. If the patients with an AVA of less than or equal to 1.0 cm2 were considered severe and patients with a total score less than 5 were considered mild-moderate, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy for a score greater than or equal to 5 were 93 percent, 96 percent, and 98 percent, respectively. The relation between the score and aortic valve gradient (AVG) was linear with a score of greater than or equal to 5 correctly identifying 84/88 (95 percent) with an AVG greater than or equal to 40 mm Hg. If the patients with a pressure gradient over 40 mm Hg were considered severe, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy for a score greater than or equal to 5 were 95 percent, 72 percent, and 82 percent, respectively. It is concluded that a point score system employing seven noninvasive variables is simple and accurate in identifying patients with severe AS and would be a valuable addition to a Doppler determined gradient.

摘要

在一项针对153例患者(平均年龄64.8±0.8岁)的前瞻性研究中,采用了一种用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度的非侵入性评分系统,这些患者来自侵入性研究或因收缩期杂音评估而转诊。记录了七个变量并进行如下评分:心电图显示左心室肥厚(0 - 2分);胸部X线片显示主动脉瓣钙化(0 - 2分);A2响度(0 - 2分);杂音的Q峰(0 - 3分);颈动脉搏动的T时间(0 - 3分);射血时间(0 - 3分);超声心动图显示左心室肥厚(0 - 1分)。总分范围为0 - 16分。所有患者均通过心导管检查测定主动脉瓣面积(AVA)。数据分析显示,总分与AVA之间的关系呈曲线关系,总分大于或等于5分能正确识别出107例患者中的100例(93%)瓣膜面积小于或等于1.0 cm²的患者。如果将瓣膜面积小于或等于1.0 cm²的患者视为重度,总分小于5分的患者视为轻度 - 中度,那么总分大于或等于5分的敏感性、特异性和预测准确性分别为93%、96%和98%。评分与主动脉瓣压差(AVG)之间的关系呈线性,总分大于或等于5分能正确识别出88例患者中的84例(95%)AVG大于或等于40 mmHg的患者。如果将压差超过40 mmHg的患者视为重度,那么总分大于或等于5分的敏感性、特异性和预测准确性分别为95%、72%和82%。结论是,采用七个非侵入性变量的评分系统在识别重度AS患者方面简单且准确,对于基于多普勒测定的压差是一项有价值的补充。

相似文献

1
Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adults.成人主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的无创评估。
Chest. 1987 May;91(5):682-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.5.682.
2
Progression of aortic stenosis in adult men. Detection by noninvasive methods.成年男性主动脉瓣狭窄的进展。通过非侵入性方法进行检测。
Chest. 1987 Jul;92(1):40-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.1.40.
3
Progression of aortic stenosis in the elderly detected by noninvasive methods.通过非侵入性方法检测老年人主动脉瓣狭窄的进展情况。
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1988 Jun;35(1-2):19-24.
4
Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adult patients.成年患者主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的无创评估。
Am Heart J. 1984 May;107(5 Pt 1):959-66. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90835-4.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in severe aortic stenosis in the elderly.连续波多普勒超声心动图对老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄的诊断准确性
Jpn Heart J. 1988 Mar;29(2):169-78. doi: 10.1536/ihj.29.169.
6
Prediction of severity of aortic stenosis: accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的预测:多种非侵入性参数的准确性
Am J Med. 1988 Jul;85(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90499-8.
7
Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly.老年患者主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的有创与无创评估比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(3):406-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967836. Epub 2012 May 29.
8
[Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].[使用多普勒超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度进行无创定量和分类]
Z Kardiol. 1992 Nov;81(11):619-26.
9
Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.根据 Gorlin 公式和多普勒超声心动图连续性方程得出的主动脉瓣面积差异:与瓣膜性主动脉狭窄患者血流的关系
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Aug;16(8):985-92.
10
Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.低心输出量患者中评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的新旧多普勒超声心动图指标的可靠性
Ital Heart J. 2002 Apr;3(4):248-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-based detection of aortic stenosis from chest radiographs.基于人工智能的胸部X光片主动脉瓣狭窄检测
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Dec 7;3(1):20-28. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab102. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Phonocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic response to balloon aortic valvuloplasty.球囊主动脉瓣成形术血流动力学反应的心音图评估
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(1):42-7.
3
Obituary: Herbert N. Hultgren.
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Sep;21(9):695-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210918.
4
Problems in the diagnosis and investigation of aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄的诊断与检查中的问题
Postgrad Med J. 1991 Dec;67(794):1039-41. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.67.794.1039.