Nitta M, Nakamura T, Hultgren H N, Bilisoly J, Marquess B
Chest. 1987 May;91(5):682-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.5.682.
A noninvasive point score system for the evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS) was employed in a prospective study of 153 patients (mean age 64.8 +/- 0.8 years) referred from invasive studies or for the evaluation of a systolic murmur. Seven variables were recorded and scored as follows: LVH by ECG (0-2); aortic valve calcium by chest x-ray film (0-2); loudness of A2 (0-2); Q-peak of murmur (0-3); T-time of carotid pulse (0-3); ejection time (0-3); and LVH by echo (0-1). Range of the total score was 0-16. All patients had the aortic valve area (AVA) determined by cardiac catheterization. Data analysis revealed that the relation between the total score and the AVA was curvilinear with a score greater than or equal to 5 correctly identifying 100/107 (93 percent) of patients with a valve area of less than or equal to 1.0 cm2. If the patients with an AVA of less than or equal to 1.0 cm2 were considered severe and patients with a total score less than 5 were considered mild-moderate, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy for a score greater than or equal to 5 were 93 percent, 96 percent, and 98 percent, respectively. The relation between the score and aortic valve gradient (AVG) was linear with a score of greater than or equal to 5 correctly identifying 84/88 (95 percent) with an AVG greater than or equal to 40 mm Hg. If the patients with a pressure gradient over 40 mm Hg were considered severe, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy for a score greater than or equal to 5 were 95 percent, 72 percent, and 82 percent, respectively. It is concluded that a point score system employing seven noninvasive variables is simple and accurate in identifying patients with severe AS and would be a valuable addition to a Doppler determined gradient.
在一项针对153例患者(平均年龄64.8±0.8岁)的前瞻性研究中,采用了一种用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度的非侵入性评分系统,这些患者来自侵入性研究或因收缩期杂音评估而转诊。记录了七个变量并进行如下评分:心电图显示左心室肥厚(0 - 2分);胸部X线片显示主动脉瓣钙化(0 - 2分);A2响度(0 - 2分);杂音的Q峰(0 - 3分);颈动脉搏动的T时间(0 - 3分);射血时间(0 - 3分);超声心动图显示左心室肥厚(0 - 1分)。总分范围为0 - 16分。所有患者均通过心导管检查测定主动脉瓣面积(AVA)。数据分析显示,总分与AVA之间的关系呈曲线关系,总分大于或等于5分能正确识别出107例患者中的100例(93%)瓣膜面积小于或等于1.0 cm²的患者。如果将瓣膜面积小于或等于1.0 cm²的患者视为重度,总分小于5分的患者视为轻度 - 中度,那么总分大于或等于5分的敏感性、特异性和预测准确性分别为93%、96%和98%。评分与主动脉瓣压差(AVG)之间的关系呈线性,总分大于或等于5分能正确识别出88例患者中的84例(95%)AVG大于或等于40 mmHg的患者。如果将压差超过40 mmHg的患者视为重度,那么总分大于或等于5分的敏感性、特异性和预测准确性分别为95%、72%和82%。结论是,采用七个非侵入性变量的评分系统在识别重度AS患者方面简单且准确,对于基于多普勒测定的压差是一项有价值的补充。