• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国老年人提供非正式护理的意愿:离散选择实验。

Willingness to provide informal care to older adults in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Str.7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.

Health Services Research Unit, AOK Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Apr;24(3):425-436. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01483-5. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-022-01483-5
PMID:35689744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10060358/
Abstract

As the German population is continually aging and the majority of older adults still wish to 'age in place', the need for informal care provided by family and friends will correspondingly continue to increase. In addition, while the need for formal (professional) care services is also likely to increase, the supply already does not meet the demand in Germany today. The aim of our study is the elicitation of people's willingness to provide informal care by means of a discrete choice experiment. The self-complete postal survey was disseminated to a random sample of the German general population in Lower Saxony. Data cleansing resulted in a final sample size of 280 participants. A conditional logit and a latent class model were estimated. All attributes were judged as highly relevant by the respondents. The results revealed that an increase in the care hours per day had the greatest negative impact overall on the willingness to provide informal care in our sample. The marginal willingness-to-accept for 1 h of informal care was €14.54 when having to provide informal care for 8 h in reference to 2 h per day. This value is considerably higher than the national minimum wage of €9.82. A three-class latent class model revealed preference heterogeneity. While a monetary compensation is often discussed to increase the willingness and availability of informal care in a country, our results show that this statement could not be generalized within our entire sample.

摘要

随着德国人口的持续老龄化,大多数老年人仍然希望“就地养老”,因此对家庭成员和朋友提供的非正式护理的需求也将相应持续增加。此外,尽管对正式(专业)护理服务的需求也可能增加,但德国目前的供应已经无法满足需求。我们的研究目的是通过离散选择实验来确定人们提供非正式护理的意愿。这项自我完成的邮寄调查在德国下萨克森州的随机抽样人群中进行。经过数据清理,最终样本量为 280 名参与者。我们估计了条件逻辑回归模型和潜在类别模型。所有属性都被受访者认为具有高度相关性。结果表明,在我们的样本中,每天的护理时间增加对提供非正式护理的意愿产生了最大的负面影响。与每天提供 2 小时护理相比,每天提供 8 小时护理的情况下,增加 1 小时非正式护理的边际接受意愿为 14.54 欧元。这个数值远远高于 9.82 欧元的德国全国最低工资。一个三类别潜在类别模型揭示了偏好异质性。虽然经常讨论用货币补偿来提高一个国家提供非正式护理的意愿和可及性,但我们的研究结果表明,这一说法并不能推广到我们的整个样本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be6/10060358/8d129e94da98/10198_2022_1483_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be6/10060358/8d129e94da98/10198_2022_1483_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9be6/10060358/8d129e94da98/10198_2022_1483_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Willingness to provide informal care to older adults in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国老年人提供非正式护理的意愿:离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Apr;24(3):425-436. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01483-5. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
2
Informal and formal care preferences and expected willingness of providing elderly care in Germany: protocol for a mixed-methods study.德国非正式和正式护理偏好以及提供老年护理的预期意愿:一项混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):e023253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023253.
3
The impact of different care dependencies on people's willingness to provide informal care: a discrete choice experiment in Germany.不同护理依赖程度对人们提供非正式护理意愿的影响:德国的一项离散选择实验
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Jun 3;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00448-5.
4
[Informal care and occupation: Factors influencing the willingness to provide care].[非正式照料与职业:影响照料意愿的因素]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 May;178:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Older adults preferences for long-term caregivers in China: a discrete choice experiment.中国老年人对长期照护者的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability.采用离散选择实验方法来评估非正规护理的价值:以智障儿童为例。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0637-2.
7
Putting a Dollar Value on Informal Care Time Provided to People Living With Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.为照顾痴呆症患者的非正规护理时间定价:离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2024 Sep;27(9):1251-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.021. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
8
The Monetary Value of Informal Care: Obtaining Pure Time Valuations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.非正式护理的货币价值:使用离散选择实验获得纯时间估值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):531-540. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0724-4.
9
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity.运用离散选择实验评估非正规护理任务:探索偏好异质性。
Health Econ. 2011 Aug;20(8):930-44. doi: 10.1002/hec.1656. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention in nursing care: a study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on the effects of physical exercise and environmental interventions on physical activity behavior and physical functioning in nursing home residents (PROGRESS study).护理中的预防:一项关于体育锻炼和环境干预对养老院居民身体活动行为及身体机能影响的整群随机对照试验的研究方案(PROGRESS研究)
Front Aging. 2025 Aug 19;6:1466315. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1466315. eCollection 2025.
2
Valuation of informal care for the old-aged with disabilities in China-a discrete choice experiment approach.中国残疾老年人非正式照料的价值评估——一种离散选择实验方法
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jun 2;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00642-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Completely Different or Quite Similar? The Sociodemographic Structure of the AOK Lower Saxony in Comparison to the General and Working Population in Lower Saxony and the Federal Republic of Germany].[截然不同还是极为相似?与下萨克森州及德意志联邦共和国的普通人口和劳动人口相比,下萨克森州AOK的社会人口结构]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Nov;83(S 02):S77-S86. doi: 10.1055/a-1553-3565. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
["But you often come unstuck on particularities" - Care consultants on legislation amendments and the challenges of their job: A qualitative investigation].["但你常常在细节上陷入困境"——护理顾问谈立法修正案及其工作中的挑战:一项定性调查]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 May 17.
3
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.
健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
4
Exploring the experience of informal caregivers of dependent elderly people with the well-being valuation method.运用幸福感评估方法探索依赖他人照顾的老年人的非正式照料者的经历。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 29;16:1584632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1584632. eCollection 2025.
5
Preference for community health services in people with chronic diseases: a discrete choice experiment in China.慢性病患者对社区卫生服务的偏好:一项中国的离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;12:1479237. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479237. eCollection 2024.
6
Farmers' preferences for rice bean production traits in western Kenya.肯尼亚西部农民对饭豆生产性状的偏好
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 26;10(21):e39888. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39888. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
7
Preference of urban and rural older people in Shandong Province for long-term care insurance: based on discrete choice experiment.山东省城乡老年人对长期护理保险的偏好:基于离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;12:1445273. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445273. eCollection 2024.
8
Factors influencing senior care and living preferences among older adults in Jiangsu, China: a cross-sectional survey study.中国江苏老年人的高级护理和居住偏好的影响因素:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11168-9.
9
Willingness to support neighbours practically or emotionally: a cross-sectional survey among the general public.在实际或情感上支持邻居的意愿:一项针对普通公众的横断面调查。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 May 9;18:26323524241249196. doi: 10.1177/26323524241249196. eCollection 2024.
10
Old people's preference for nursing homes in East China: a discrete choice experiment.中国东部地区老年人对养老院的偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 22;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01907-y.
Needs and preferences of informal caregivers regarding outpatient care for the elderly: a systematic literature review.老年人门诊护理中非正式照护者的需求和偏好:系统文献回顾。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1068-4.
4
Does Inclusion of Interactions Result in Higher Precision of Estimated Health State Values?纳入交互作用是否会提高健康状态值估计的精度?
Value Health. 2018 Dec;21(12):1437-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
5
Predictors of the personal benefits and positive aspects of informal caregiving.非正式照护的个人获益和积极方面的预测因素。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Nov;23(11):1533-1538. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1501662. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
6
An exploration of older Hong Kong residents' willingness to make copayments toward vouchers for community care.探讨香港老年居民对社区护理代金券自付费用意愿。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Jul-Sep;31(4):358-377. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1467157. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Positive psychology outcome measures for family caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic review.积极心理学在痴呆症患者家庭照顾者中的结局指标:系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Aug;29(8):1281-1296. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000655. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
Longitudinal predictors of informal and formal caregiving time in community-dwelling dementia patients.社区痴呆症患者非正规和正规照料时间的纵向预测因素
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;51(4):607-16. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1138-7. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Informal care motivations and intergenerational transfers in European countries.欧洲国家的非正式照料动机与代际转移
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1:89-103. doi: 10.1002/hec.3135.