• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intention to maintain and willingness to stop: Applying a dual-process model to understanding the maintenance of COVID-19 preventive behaviors.维持意愿和停止意愿:应用双过程模型理解 COVID-19 预防行为的维持。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2023 Feb;15(1):315-336. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12381. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
2
Predicting hand washing, mask wearing and social distancing behaviors among older adults during the covid-19 pandemic: an integrated social cognition model.预测 COVID-19 大流行期间老年人的洗手、戴口罩和保持社交距离行为:综合社会认知模型。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02785-2.
3
Descriptive Norms and Prototypes Predict COVID-19 Prevention Cognitions and Behaviors in the United States: Applying the Prototype Willingness Model to Pandemic Mitigation.描述性规范和原型可预测美国 COVID-19 预防认知和行为:将原型意愿模型应用于大流行缓解。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Oct 27;55(11):1089-1103. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab075.
4
Impact of Online Information on Self-Isolation Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情期间在线信息对自我隔离意愿的影响:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19128. doi: 10.2196/19128.
5
Association of Social-Cognitive Factors with Individual Preventive Behaviors of COVID-19 among a Mixed-Sample of Older Adults from China and Germany.社会认知因素与中德混合老年人群体 COVID-19 个体预防行为的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11):6364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116364.
6
Differences in Preventive Behaviors of COVID-19 between Urban and Rural Residents: Lessons Learned from A Cross-Sectional Study in China.城乡居民 COVID-19 预防行为差异:来自中国横断面研究的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 20;17(12):4437. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124437.
7
Self-esteem influences the willingness to engage in COVID-19 prevention behavior and persuasion efficacy.自尊影响人们参与 COVID-19 预防行为的意愿和说服效果。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;320:115715. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115715. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
8
Role of Threat and Coping Appraisal in Protection Motivation for Adoption of Preventive Behavior During COVID-19 Pandemic.威胁和应对评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用预防行为的保护动机中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;9:678566. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.678566. eCollection 2021.
9
The effect of habit on preventive behaviors: a two-wave longitudinal study to predict COVID-19 preventive behaviors.习惯对预防行为的影响:一项预测新冠病毒预防行为的两波纵向研究。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 May 18;10(1):480-497. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2075876. eCollection 2022.
10
Psychosocial factors associated with mask-wearing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行期间戴口罩行为相关的社会心理因素。
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Oct;27(9):1996-2006. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1998562. Epub 2021 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis on application of Protection Motivation Theory in preventive behaviors against COVID-19.保护动机理论在 COVID-19 预防行为应用中的荟萃分析。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Jun 19:103758. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103758.
2
Application of Protection Motivation Theory to COVID-19 vaccination among a predominantly Hispanic sample of adolescents.保护动机理论在以西班牙裔青少年为主的样本中对新冠疫苗接种的应用。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug;34:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102245. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Application of protection motivation theory and cultural tightness-looseness for predicting individuals' compliance with the government's recommended preventive measures during regular prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.应用保护动机理论和文化紧密度-宽松度预测个体在我国 COVID-19 常态化防控期间对政府推荐预防措施的遵从性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1043247. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1043247. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Campus traffic and e-Learning during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的校园交通与电子学习
Comput Netw. 2020 Jul 20;176:107290. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107290. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries.金砖国家应对 COVID-19 的核心政策差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 20;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z.
3
A dual process model to predict adolescents' screen time and physical activity.双重过程模型预测青少年的屏幕时间和身体活动。
Psychol Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;38(7):827-846. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1988598. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
Theory of Planned Behavior Analysis of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focusing on the Intention-Behavior Gap.《COVID-19 大流行期间社交隔离的计划行为理论分析:关注意图-行为差距》。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jul 22;55(8):805-812. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab041.
5
Young Adults Underestimate How Well Peers Adhere to COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Guidelines.年轻人低估了同龄人对 COVID-19 预防行为准则的遵守程度。
J Prim Prev. 2021 Jun;42(3):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s10935-021-00633-4. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
Assessing Public Willingness to Wear Face Masks during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Fresh Insights from the Theory of Planned Behavior.评估公众在 COVID-19 大流行期间戴口罩的意愿:来自计划行为理论的新见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094577.
7
Estimating and mitigating the risk of COVID-19 epidemic rebound associated with reopening of international borders in Vietnam: a modelling study.评估并缓解越南国际边境重新开放引发的新冠疫情反弹风险:一项建模研究
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jul;9(7):e916-e924. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00103-0. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
Mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: Its association with public perceptions toward government's pandemic responses and lifestyle changes.新冠疫情期间的心理困扰:及其与公众对政府疫情应对措施的看法和生活方式变化的关联。
Curr Psychol. 2021;40(12):6282-6290. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01547-4. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
9
Perceived vulnerability to disease, knowledge about COVID-19, and changes in preventive behavior during lockdown in a German convenience sample.德国便利样本中对疾病的感知易感性、关于新冠病毒的知识以及封锁期间预防行为的变化
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(10):7362-7370. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01456-6. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
10
Risk Compensation and COVID-19 Vaccines.风险补偿与 COVID-19 疫苗。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):858-859. doi: 10.7326/M20-8251. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

维持意愿和停止意愿:应用双过程模型理解 COVID-19 预防行为的维持。

Intention to maintain and willingness to stop: Applying a dual-process model to understanding the maintenance of COVID-19 preventive behaviors.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.

Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2023 Feb;15(1):315-336. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12381. Epub 2022 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1111/aphw.12381
PMID:35691935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349392/
Abstract

Preventive behaviors have played an essential role in coping with COVID-19 and may continue to exerting a crucial impact on pandemic control in the future. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of social-cognitive factors on maintenance of COVID-19 preventive behaviors based on a dual-process model, which encompasses a reasoned path via the intention to maintain and a social reaction path via the willingness to stop. We collected a probability sample of 472 community-dwelling adults. Social-cognitive factors, behavioral tendencies, and preventive behaviors of COVID-19 were measured. The results supported that the dual-process framework could account for individual differences in preventive behaviors. Self-efficacy and response cost significantly explained the intention to maintain preventive behaviors, while favorability of risk image and subjective norm significantly explained the willingness to stop preventive behaviors. Our findings proposed strategies for promoting individuals' maintenance of preventive behaviors during a pandemic. The development of prevention policies may focus on two paths: strengthening the intended path by enhancing self-efficacy and decreasing response cost of preventive behaviors and monitoring and improving social influences, such as risk prototype and subjective norm, which can reduce the willingness to stop preventive behaviors.

摘要

预防行为在应对 COVID-19 方面发挥了重要作用,并且可能在未来继续对疫情控制产生关键影响。本研究旨在基于双过程模型评估社会认知因素对维持 COVID-19 预防行为的有效性,该模型包含通过维持意图的理性路径和通过停止意愿的社会反应路径。我们收集了一个由 472 名社区居住成年人组成的概率样本。测量了社会认知因素、行为倾向和 COVID-19 的预防行为。结果表明,双过程框架可以解释预防行为的个体差异。自我效能感和反应成本显著解释了维持预防行为的意图,而风险形象的有利性和主观规范显著解释了停止预防行为的意愿。我们的研究结果为在大流行期间促进个人维持预防行为提供了策略。预防政策的制定可以关注两条路径:通过增强预防行为的自我效能感和降低反应成本来加强预期路径,以及监测和改善社会影响,如风险原型和主观规范,这可以降低停止预防行为的意愿。