• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 COVID-19 大流行期间老年人的洗手、戴口罩和保持社交距离行为:综合社会认知模型。

Predicting hand washing, mask wearing and social distancing behaviors among older adults during the covid-19 pandemic: an integrated social cognition model.

机构信息

Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, 12/F, Hong Kong Baptist University ShekMun Campus, 8 On Muk Street, ShekMun, Shatin, Hong Kong.

Centre for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02785-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-02785-2
PMID:35109798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807958/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults are at a higher risk from COVID-19. Individual preventive behaviors including frequent hand washing, mask wearing, and social distancing play important roles in reducing the transmission of COVID-19 in the community. This study aimed to identify the determinants of three preventive behaviors of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic by using an Integrated Social Cognition Model.

METHODS

Using a prospective study design, 516 Chinese older adults from Hubei province of China (mean age = 67.55 years, SD = 6.60, 57.9% females) completed two online questionnaire surveys. The demographics, social cognition constructs (motivational self-efficacy, risk perception, attitude, subjective norm, health knowledge, intention, volitional self-efficacy, planning, action control) and three preventive behaviors were measured during the first-wave online survey from 18 May 2020 to 7 June 2020. One month later, three preventive behaviors were measured again during the second-wave online survey. Data were analyzed by structural equation modelling.

RESULTS

Models showed attitude, motivational self-efficacy and subjective norm were consistent predictors of intention, motivational self-efficacy was a consistent predictor of volitional self-efficacy, planning and volitional self-efficacy were consistent predictors of action control, and health knowledge was a consistent predictor of behaviors across all three preventive behaviors. In addition, mediating relationships were found in the model of hand washing behavior. In particular, planning (β = .109, p = .042) and action control (β = .056, p = .047) mediated between volitional self-efficacy and hand washing respectively. Action control also mediated between planning and hand washing (β = .087, p = .044). Moreover, the inclusion of past behaviors in three models attenuated most of the structural relations.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study's findings basically supported the Integrated Social Cognition Model and identified key modifiable determinants of preventive behaviors. Based on this model, future interventions aiming to promote COVID-19 preventive behaviors among older adults are warranted.

摘要

背景

老年人感染 COVID-19 的风险更高。个人预防行为,包括勤洗手、戴口罩和保持社交距离,在减少社区中 COVID-19 的传播方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在使用综合社会认知模型来确定 COVID-19 大流行期间老年人三种预防行为的决定因素。

方法

采用前瞻性研究设计,来自中国湖北省的 516 名中国老年人(平均年龄=67.55 岁,标准差=6.60,57.9%为女性)完成了两次在线问卷调查。在第一次在线调查中,于 2020 年 5 月 18 日至 6 月 7 日期间测量了人口统计学、社会认知结构(动机自我效能、风险感知、态度、主观规范、健康知识、意图、意志自我效能、计划、行动控制)和三种预防行为。一个月后,在第二次在线调查中再次测量了这三种预防行为。通过结构方程模型进行数据分析。

结果

模型表明,态度、动机自我效能和主观规范是意图的一致预测因素,动机自我效能是意志自我效能的一致预测因素,计划和意志自我效能是行动控制的一致预测因素,健康知识是所有三种预防行为的一致预测因素。此外,在洗手行为模型中发现了中介关系。具体而言,计划(β=0.109,p=0.042)和行动控制(β=0.056,p=0.047)分别在意志自我效能和洗手行为之间起中介作用。行动控制也在计划和洗手之间起中介作用(β=0.087,p=0.044)。此外,将过去行为纳入三个模型减弱了大多数结构关系。

结论

本研究结果基本支持综合社会认知模型,并确定了预防行为的关键可调节决定因素。基于该模型,有必要针对老年人开展未来的干预措施,以促进 COVID-19 的预防行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/0f290bdc1b13/12877_2022_2785_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/0ff39a07e6fa/12877_2022_2785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/81c8f191177d/12877_2022_2785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/b2cf41679981/12877_2022_2785_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/0f290bdc1b13/12877_2022_2785_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/0ff39a07e6fa/12877_2022_2785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/81c8f191177d/12877_2022_2785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/b2cf41679981/12877_2022_2785_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca1/8809012/0f290bdc1b13/12877_2022_2785_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting hand washing, mask wearing and social distancing behaviors among older adults during the covid-19 pandemic: an integrated social cognition model.预测 COVID-19 大流行期间老年人的洗手、戴口罩和保持社交距离行为:综合社会认知模型。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02785-2.
2
Individual Preventive Behaviors of COVID-19 and Associated Psychological Factors Among Chinese Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.中国老年人新冠病毒病的个体预防行为及相关心理因素:一项横断面在线调查
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 21;13:827152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827152. eCollection 2022.
3
Association of Social-Cognitive Factors with Individual Preventive Behaviors of COVID-19 among a Mixed-Sample of Older Adults from China and Germany.社会认知因素与中德混合老年人群体 COVID-19 个体预防行为的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11):6364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116364.
4
Predicting Hand Washing and Sleep Hygiene Behaviors among College Students: Test of an Integrated Social-Cognition Model.预测大学生的洗手和睡眠卫生行为:综合社会认知模型的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):1209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041209.
5
Using an integrated social cognition model to predict COVID-19 preventive behaviours.利用综合社会认知模型预测 COVID-19 预防行为。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):981-1005. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12465. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Predicting Social Distancing Intention and Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Social Cognition Model.预测 COVID-19 大流行期间的社交隔离意愿和行为:一个综合社会认知模型。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Oct 1;54(10):713-727. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa073.
7
Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19.《健康行动过程方法在 COVID-19 期间社会隔离行为中的应用》
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1244-1269. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12231. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life Among Older Adults After the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hubei China.中国湖北 COVID-19 大流行第一波后老年人的生活方式行为和生活质量。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;9:744514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.744514. eCollection 2021.
9
Assessing factors associated with compliance to preventive measures of COVID-19 in Rwanda: a cross-sectional community survey.评估卢旺达 COVID-19 预防措施依从性的相关因素:一项横断面社区调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e078610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078610.
10
Using the health action process approach to predict facemask use and hand washing in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.在中国新冠疫情早期,运用健康行动过程方法预测口罩使用和洗手情况。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(8):6484-6493. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01985-0. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventive behaviors related to COVID-19 based on social cognitive integrative model constructs among medical students: A cross-sectional study.基于社会认知整合模型构建的医学生与新冠病毒病相关的预防行为:一项横断面研究
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 15;18(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07377-y.
2
Effectiveness of a WeChat Mini Program-Based Intervention on Promoting Multiple Health Behavior Changes Among Chinese Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases in Home-Based Rehabilitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于微信小程序的干预措施对促进中国心血管疾病患者居家康复中多种健康行为改变的效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e66249. doi: 10.2196/66249.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Using the health action process approach to predict facemask use and hand washing in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.在中国新冠疫情早期,运用健康行动过程方法预测口罩使用和洗手情况。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(8):6484-6493. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01985-0. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Self-Regulation in the Time of Lockdown.封锁时期的自我调节
Front Neuroinform. 2021 Mar 8;15:567920. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2021.567920. eCollection 2021.
3
Knowledge-Behavior Gap on COVID-19 among Older People in Rural Thailand.泰国农村老年人对新冠疫情的认知-行为差距
Understanding parental support for children's 24-hour movement behaviors based on an adapted HAPA framework: A three-wave prospective study.
基于适应性健康行动过程方法(HAPA)框架理解父母对孩子24小时运动行为的支持:一项三波前瞻性研究
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Jun;17(3):e70034. doi: 10.1111/aphw.70034.
4
Preventive behaviors of COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic among community-dwelling older adults in Thailand.泰国社区居住老年人在新冠疫情期间的新冠病毒预防行为
PeerJ. 2025 May 13;13:e19412. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19412. eCollection 2025.
5
Modelling the compensatory and carry-over effects between physical activity and fruit-vegetable consumption in young adults.模拟年轻人身体活动与果蔬消费之间的代偿效应和延续效应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81585-7.
6
Prevalence and correlates of meeting 24-hour movement guidelines and its associations with physical fitness and depressive symptoms among adults: a provincial surveillance in China.中国省级监测成人符合 24 小时身体活动指南的现况及其与体质和抑郁症状的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):3222. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20516-7.
7
The mediating role of health literacy in the relationship between self-care and planned behavior against Covid-19.健康素养在自我保健与新冠疫情防范计划行为关系中的中介作用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09513-8.
8
Association of 24-hour movement guideline adherence, mental health and quality of life in young adults: the role of e-Health literacy.青少年 24 小时活动指南依从性、心理健康和生活质量的关联:电子健康素养的作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1344718. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344718. eCollection 2024.
9
Electronic Health Literacy Scale-Web3.0 for Older Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases: Validation Study.电子健康素养量表-Web3.0 版:用于患有非传染性疾病的老年人的验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 3;26:e52457. doi: 10.2196/52457.
10
Interventions to promote health literacy among working-age populations experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage: systematic review.促进经济社会地位处于不利的劳动年龄段人群健康素养的干预措施:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;12:1332720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332720. eCollection 2024.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Feb 26;7:2333721421997207. doi: 10.1177/2333721421997207. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Precautionary Behavior and Depression in Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Cross-Sectional Study in Hubei, China.《COVID-19 大流行期间老年人的预防行为和抑郁:中国湖北的一项在线横断面研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4):1853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041853.
5
Knowledge, socio-cognitive perceptions and the practice of hand hygiene and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of UK university students.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,知识、社会认知感知以及手部卫生和社会隔离实践:对英国大学生的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10461-0.
6
Hand(y) hygiene insights: Applying three theoretical models to investigate hospital patients' and visitors' hand hygiene behavior.手卫生洞察:应用三个理论模型调查医院患者和访客的手卫生行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245543. eCollection 2021.
7
COVID-19 and the public response: Knowledge, attitude and practice of the public in mitigating the pandemic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.COVID-19 和公众反应:减轻埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴大流行中公众的知识、态度和实践。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0244780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244780. eCollection 2021.
8
Physical Distancing Behavior: The Role of Emotions, Personality, Motivations, and Moral Decision-Making.身体疏远行为:情绪、个性、动机和道德决策的作用。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Jan 20;46(1):15-26. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa122.
9
Determinants of Preventive Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: Comparing the Sociocultural, Psychosocial, and Social Cognitive Explanations.法国应对新冠疫情的预防行为决定因素:比较社会文化、心理社会和社会认知解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:584500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584500. eCollection 2020.
10
Worry, Risk Perception, and Controllability Predict Intentions Toward COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors.担忧、风险认知和可控性预测对新冠病毒预防行为的意向。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 19;11:582720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582720. eCollection 2020.