Suppr超能文献

YouTube上关于富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良视频的质量与可靠性评估

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

作者信息

Bolac Ruveyde, Ozturk Yucel, Yildiz Elvin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 May 27;7(2):134-139. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.90277. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the quality and reliability of videos on Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) on YouTube.

METHODS

A search of YouTube was performed for the term "FECD" without any changes to the website's standard search preferences. The first 100 videos were recorded. A total of 71 videos were evaluated regarding the DISCERN score (min-max: 16-75), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score (min-max: 0-4), and Global Quality Scale (GQS) score (min-max: 0-5).

RESULTS

The mean DISCERN score was 40.1±15.6 (moderate), the mean JAMA score was 2.01±0.7 (poor), the mean GQS score was 2.5±1.3 (moderate), and the mean video power index score was 106.8±135.7. Twenty-three of the videos (32.4%) were uploaded by physicians, 25 (35.2%) by universities/private hospitals, and 21 (29.6%) by health channels. Thirty-six videos (50.7%) contained information about the disease, 24 (33.8%) discussed surgical techniques, and 11 (15.5%) were about patient experience.

CONCLUSION

YouTube provides only moderate-quality health information on FECD. Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about FECD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估YouTube上关于富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良(FECD)的视频质量和可靠性。

方法

在YouTube上搜索“FECD”,网站标准搜索偏好不作任何更改。记录前100个视频。共对71个视频进行了DISCERN评分(范围:16 - 75)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分(范围:0 - 4)和全球质量量表(GQS)评分(范围:0 - 5)的评估。

结果

DISCERN评分均值为40.1±15.6(中等),JAMA评分均值为2.01±0.7(差),GQS评分均值为2.5±1.3(中等),视频影响力指数评分均值为106.8±135.7。其中23个视频(32.4%)由医生上传,25个(35.2%)由大学/私立医院上传,21个(29.6%)由健康频道上传。36个视频(50.7%)包含疾病信息,24个(33.8%)讨论了手术技术,11个(15.5%)关于患者体验。

结论

YouTube提供的关于FECD的健康信息质量仅为中等。医生和专业组织应意识到并接受这项不断发展的技术,以提高对FECD的认识。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 May 27;7(2):134-139. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.90277. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Assessment of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of Information About Retinoblastoma on YouTube.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2025 Jan-Feb;62(1):33-38. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20240807-03. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
4
Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.
Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14118. doi: 10.1111/and.14118. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube.
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Sep 6;11(4):295-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735231. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.
Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):598-604. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):754-759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
9
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
10
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluating the Adequacy of YouTube Videos for Learning Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65760. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Is YouTube Reliable to Teach Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass?
Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62510. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62510. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 11;12:e17215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17215. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Update on the Surgical Management of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(4):757-765. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00293-3. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
An Analysis of YouTube Videos as Educational Resources for Patients About Refractive Surgery.
Cornea. 2020 Apr;39(4):491-494. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002237.
6
Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Clinical, Genetic, Pathophysiologic, and Therapeutic Aspects.
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2019 Sep 15;5:151-175. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-014852.
8
Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 29;12:2459-2470. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S183249. eCollection 2018.
9
YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity.
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):613-617. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1902-2. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Update on Pathogenesis and Future Directions.
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jan;45(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000469.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验