• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube上关于富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良视频的质量与可靠性评估

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

作者信息

Bolac Ruveyde, Ozturk Yucel, Yildiz Elvin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 May 27;7(2):134-139. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.90277. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.14744/bej.2022.90277
PMID:35692267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9169149/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the quality and reliability of videos on Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) on YouTube.

METHODS

A search of YouTube was performed for the term "FECD" without any changes to the website's standard search preferences. The first 100 videos were recorded. A total of 71 videos were evaluated regarding the DISCERN score (min-max: 16-75), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score (min-max: 0-4), and Global Quality Scale (GQS) score (min-max: 0-5).

RESULTS

The mean DISCERN score was 40.1±15.6 (moderate), the mean JAMA score was 2.01±0.7 (poor), the mean GQS score was 2.5±1.3 (moderate), and the mean video power index score was 106.8±135.7. Twenty-three of the videos (32.4%) were uploaded by physicians, 25 (35.2%) by universities/private hospitals, and 21 (29.6%) by health channels. Thirty-six videos (50.7%) contained information about the disease, 24 (33.8%) discussed surgical techniques, and 11 (15.5%) were about patient experience.

CONCLUSION

YouTube provides only moderate-quality health information on FECD. Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about FECD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估YouTube上关于富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良(FECD)的视频质量和可靠性。

方法

在YouTube上搜索“FECD”,网站标准搜索偏好不作任何更改。记录前100个视频。共对71个视频进行了DISCERN评分(范围:16 - 75)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分(范围:0 - 4)和全球质量量表(GQS)评分(范围:0 - 5)的评估。

结果

DISCERN评分均值为40.1±15.6(中等),JAMA评分均值为2.01±0.7(差),GQS评分均值为2.5±1.3(中等),视频影响力指数评分均值为106.8±135.7。其中23个视频(32.4%)由医生上传,25个(35.2%)由大学/私立医院上传,21个(29.6%)由健康频道上传。36个视频(50.7%)包含疾病信息,24个(33.8%)讨论了手术技术,11个(15.5%)关于患者体验。

结论

YouTube提供的关于FECD的健康信息质量仅为中等。医生和专业组织应意识到并接受这项不断发展的技术,以提高对FECD的认识。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.YouTube上关于富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良视频的质量与可靠性评估
Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 May 27;7(2):134-139. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.90277. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.评估在YouTube上分享的葡萄膜炎视频中信息的质量、实用性和可靠性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Assessment of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of Information About Retinoblastoma on YouTube.YouTube上视网膜母细胞瘤信息的质量、可靠性及受欢迎程度评估
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2025 Jan-Feb;62(1):33-38. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20240807-03. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
4
Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.YouTube 上睾丸癌视频的质量分析。
Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14118. doi: 10.1111/and.14118. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube.YouTube上分享的腕管综合征信息的可靠性和质量评估。
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Sep 6;11(4):295-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735231. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.评估有关眼睑下垂手术的 YouTube 视频的教育质量和可靠性。
Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):598-604. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上的上眼睑双眼皮成形术视频的可靠性和质量。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):754-759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
9
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
10
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of YouTube® videos on knowledge on tracheal intubation for anesthesiologist trainees: a prospective observational study.YouTube®视频对麻醉学实习医生气管插管知识的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Feb 25;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00232-3.
2
Evaluating the Adequacy of YouTube Videos for Learning Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision.评估YouTube视频对学习腹腔镜右半结肠切除术并完整系膜切除的适用性。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65760. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Is YouTube Reliable to Teach Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass?YouTube 用于教授腹腔镜胃旁路手术是否可靠?
Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62510. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62510. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Content, educational value and quality analysis of videos about neurorehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis on YouTube®.YouTube® 上多发性硬化症患者神经康复相关视频的内容、教育价值和质量分析。
Rev Neurol. 2024 Aug 1;79(3):77-88. doi: 10.33588/rn.7903.2024091.
5
Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.评估YouTube视频作为炎性背痛信息来源的质量和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 11;12:e17215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17215. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Update on the Surgical Management of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良的手术治疗进展
Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(4):757-765. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00293-3. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns.DISCERN 和 JAMA 是否适合评估关于甲状腺癌的 YouTube 视频?方法学问题。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01763-9.
4
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
An Analysis of YouTube Videos as Educational Resources for Patients About Refractive Surgery.YouTube 视频作为屈光手术患者教育资源的分析。
Cornea. 2020 Apr;39(4):491-494. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002237.
6
Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Clinical, Genetic, Pathophysiologic, and Therapeutic Aspects.Fuchs 内皮角膜营养不良:临床、遗传、病理生理和治疗方面。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2019 Sep 15;5:151-175. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-014852.
7
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
8
Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach.屈光手术中的知情同意:面对面与远程医疗方式
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 29;12:2459-2470. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S183249. eCollection 2018.
9
YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity.YouTube作为早产儿视网膜病变信息的一个来源。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):613-617. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1902-2. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Update on Pathogenesis and Future Directions.富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良:发病机制的最新进展及未来方向
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jan;45(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000469.