• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube® 上多发性硬化症患者神经康复相关视频的内容、教育价值和质量分析。

Content, educational value and quality analysis of videos about neurorehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis on YouTube®.

机构信息

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, España.

Asociación de Leganés de Esclerosis Múltiple (ALEM), Leganés, España.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2024 Aug 1;79(3):77-88. doi: 10.33588/rn.7903.2024091.

DOI:10.33588/rn.7903.2024091
PMID:39007859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11469091/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of YouTube® has spread among patients with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). These patients consult the available videos to learn more about their disease in terms of diagnosis and making decisions about treatments, including rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, educational value, and quality analysis of MS videos about neurorehabilitation on YouTube® using quantitative instruments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was conducted on YouTube®. The first 30 videos that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The videos were classified according to the upload source and the content. All videos included in the review were assessed by the DISCERN questionnaire, the JAMA benchmark, the global quality scale (GQS) and the video information and quality index (VIQI).

RESULTS

The mean scores were: 28.3 (±9.33) in DISCERN, 2 (±0.81) in JAMA, 2.57 (±1.22) in GQS, and 11.73 (±4.06) in VIQI. JAMA score statistically significantly differed according to upload source (p = 0.002), video content (p = 0.023) and the speaker (p = 0.002). The DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and VIQI scores showed significant correlations with each other.

CONCLUSIONS

The analyzed videos about neurorehabilitation in people with MS on YouTube® were quite old since the upload, with a moderate duration and number of views, but with a poor quality of the content, educational value, and quality analysis of the videos. Our research showed that there were statistically significant differences in terms of quality, transparency, and reliability of the information, depending on the upload source, video content and the speaker.

摘要

简介

YouTube®的使用在患有多发性硬化症(MS)等慢性病的患者中已经普及。这些患者通过观看现有的视频来学习更多关于他们疾病的知识,包括诊断和治疗决策,包括康复。本研究的目的是使用定量工具评估关于多发性硬化症神经康复的 YouTube®上 MS 视频的内容、教育价值和质量分析。

材料和方法

在 YouTube®上进行了搜索。审查了符合纳入标准的前 30 个视频。根据上传源和内容对视频进行分类。对纳入审查的所有视频进行 DISCERN 问卷、JAMA 基准、全球质量量表(GQS)和视频信息和质量指数(VIQI)评估。

结果

平均得分分别为:DISCERN 为 28.3(±9.33),JAMA 为 2(±0.81),GQS 为 2.57(±1.22),VIQI 为 11.73(±4.06)。JAMA 评分根据上传源(p = 0.002)、视频内容(p = 0.023)和演讲者(p = 0.002)存在统计学差异。DISCERN、JAMA、GQS 和 VIQI 评分之间存在显著相关性。

结论

YouTube®上关于多发性硬化症神经康复的分析视频上传时间较长,时长和观看次数适中,但内容、教育价值和视频质量分析较差。我们的研究表明,信息的质量、透明度和可靠性取决于上传源、视频内容和演讲者,存在统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbd/11469091/27290cb5f5f5/RN-79-77e-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbd/11469091/36651be8652a/RN-79-77-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbd/11469091/27290cb5f5f5/RN-79-77e-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbd/11469091/36651be8652a/RN-79-77-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbd/11469091/27290cb5f5f5/RN-79-77e-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Content, educational value and quality analysis of videos about neurorehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis on YouTube®.YouTube® 上多发性硬化症患者神经康复相关视频的内容、教育价值和质量分析。
Rev Neurol. 2024 Aug 1;79(3):77-88. doi: 10.33588/rn.7903.2024091.
2
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
3
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
4
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Are YouTube videos about skull bone anatomy useful for students?关于颅骨解剖的 YouTube 视频对学生有用吗?
Clin Anat. 2024 Apr;37(3):344-352. doi: 10.1002/ca.24138. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
7
Evaluation of the usage of YouTube videos about Histology and Embryology as an educational material.评估 YouTube 视频在组织学和胚胎学教育材料中的使用情况。
Anat Histol Embryol. 2022 Nov;51(6):810-817. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12859. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
8
Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children.评估针对儿童机器人肾盂成形术的 YouTube 视频的教育价值。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):390.e1-390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on myopia: a video content analysis.评估YouTube上关于近视的视频的质量和可靠性:一项视频内容分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 18;44(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03250-2.
10
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.评估 YouTube 视频作为玻璃体腔内注射手术患者信息来源的价值。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Sep;45(7):748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Reliability and Quality of Videos as Guidance for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Cross-Sectional Study.视频作为胃肠内镜检查指导的可靠性和质量:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 11;27:e58855. doi: 10.2196/58855.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Facebook Use Provide Social Benefits to Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury?使用脸书能为患有创伤性脑损伤的成年人带来社交益处吗?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024 Mar;27(3):214-220. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0211.
2
The quality of information provided by the most popular dementia videos on TikTok.TikTok 上最受欢迎的痴呆症视频提供的信息质量。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1266415. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266415. eCollection 2023.
3
Stuttering on Instagram: What is the focus of stuttering-related Instagram posts and how do users engage with them?
Instagram 上的口吃现象:与口吃相关的 Instagram 帖子的焦点是什么,用户如何参与其中?
J Fluency Disord. 2023 Dec;78:106021. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106021. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
Study on the Quality, Relevance, and Comparability of YouTube Videos Expressing Stroke and Its Consequences From Various Sources.来自不同来源的表达中风及其后果的YouTube视频的质量、相关性和可比性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43277. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Evaluation of YouTube Information Quality About Pes Planus.评价关于扁平足的 YouTube 信息质量。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2024 Mar-Apr;114(2). doi: 10.7547/22-168.
6
Does YouTube offer high-quality ınformation? Evaluation of patient experience videos after orthognathic surgery.YouTube 上提供的信息质量如何?正颌手术后患者体验视频的评估。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Jul 1;93(4):409-416. doi: 10.2319/042522-315.1.
7
Quality analysis of YouTube videos on mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.关于急性缺血性卒中机械取栓术的YouTube视频质量分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Feb;32(2):106914. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106914. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
Cluster headache - The worst possible pain on YouTube.丛集性头痛 - 在 YouTube 上最严重的疼痛。
Headache. 2022 Oct;62(9):1222-1226. doi: 10.1111/head.14368. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
9
Content and quality analysis of videos about multiple sclerosis on social media: The case of YouTube.社交媒体中多发性硬化症相关视频的内容和质量分析:以 YouTube 为例。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104024. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
10
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.YouTube上关于富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良视频的质量与可靠性评估
Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 May 27;7(2):134-139. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.90277. eCollection 2022.