Su Yung-Yeh, Ting Yu-Lin, Wang Chih-Jung, Chao Ying-Jui, Liao Ting-Kai, Su Ping-Jui, Chiang Nai-Jung, Liao I-Chuang, Yu Yu-Ting, Liu Yi-Sheng, Tsai Hong-Ming, Li Yi-Jie, Huang Chien-Jui, Liu I-Ting, Tsai Hui-Jen, Yen Chia-Jui, Shan Yan-Shen, Chen Li-Tzong
Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institute Tainan, Taiwan.
Am J Cancer Res. 2022 May 15;12(5):2189-2202. eCollection 2022.
Both efficacy and tolerability are critical issues in choosing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The optimal regimen and the impact of conversion surgery on patient survival remains insufficiently reported in Asain population. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study aiming to evaluate the resection rate after different induction chemotherapy regimen and its impact toward survival. All patients with pancreatic cancer treated in our institute from 2013 to 2020, a total of 730 patients, were reviewed and 131 patients with LAPC were identified. For cohort homogeneity, 14 patients receiving induction concurrent chemoradiotherapy initially were excluded and 117 patients receiving induction chemotherapy were included in the study. Most patients (90 of 117, 77%) received triplet induction chemotherapy, including the combination of S1, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (SLOG) in 48, modified FOLFIRINOX in 21 and the combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (GOFL) in 21. The tumor response rate (19%-33%), the surgical exploration rate (38%-52%) and the mOS (15.4-23.0 months) were not significantly different among the three triplets. Both GOFL and SLOG regimen had comparable efficacy and less neutropenia as compared to mFOLFIRINOX. Conversion surgery was performed in 34 of 117 (29%) patients after induction chemotherapy. The median overall survival (mOS) in patients with and without conversion surgery were 29.1 and 14.1 months, respectively (P<0.0001). Radiological response alone was not a reliable indicator of successful conversion surgery. Patients who underwent conversion surgery had significantly better survival and thus highlighted the importance of surgical exploration in all patients who did not have progressive disease after induction chemotherapy.
对于不可切除的局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)患者,在选择新辅助化疗时,疗效和耐受性都是关键问题。在亚洲人群中,最佳治疗方案以及转化手术对患者生存的影响报道仍不足。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,旨在评估不同诱导化疗方案后的切除率及其对生存的影响。回顾了2013年至2020年在我院接受治疗的所有胰腺癌患者,共730例,其中131例为LAPC患者。为保证队列同质性,最初接受诱导同步放化疗的14例患者被排除,117例接受诱导化疗的患者纳入研究。大多数患者(117例中的90例,77%)接受三联诱导化疗,其中48例接受S1、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和吉西他滨联合方案(SLOG),21例接受改良FOLFIRINOX方案,21例接受吉西他滨、奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙联合方案(GOFL)。三种三联方案的肿瘤缓解率(19%-33%)、手术探查率(38%-52%)和中位总生存期(mOS,15.4-23.0个月)差异均无统计学意义。与改良FOLFIRINOX相比,GOFL和SLOG方案疗效相当且中性粒细胞减少较少。117例患者中有34例(29%)在诱导化疗后接受了转化手术。接受和未接受转化手术患者的中位总生存期分别为29.1个月和14.1个月(P<0.0001)。单纯的影像学反应并不是成功转化手术的可靠指标。接受转化手术的患者生存明显更好,因此凸显了对诱导化疗后无疾病进展的所有患者进行手术探查的重要性。