• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预期互动中的差异会导致面部记忆中的内群体偏见。

Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory.

作者信息

Wilson John Paul, See Pirita E, Bernstein Michael J, Hugenberg Kurt, Chartier Christopher

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090668. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0090668
PMID:24599294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3944439/
Abstract

According to much research, the Own Group Bias (OGB) in face memory occurs as a consequence of social categorization - ingroup members are more likely than outgroup members to be encoded as individuals and remembered well. The current work is an examination of the role of anticipated future interaction in the OGB. We conducted two studies showing that anticipated interaction influences group-based face memory. In Study 1, we provided correlational evidence that beliefs about the amount and importance of future interaction one will have with racial outgroup members is associated with the OGB, such that people expecting more interaction with outgroup members show a reduced OGB. In Study 2, we manipulated expectations about future interactions with lab-created groups and observed that high levels of anticipated future interaction with the outgroup eliminated the OGB. Thus, social group categorization drives face memory biases to the extent that group membership affords the expectation of interpersonal interaction.

摘要

根据大量研究,面部记忆中的内群体偏见(OGB)是社会分类的结果——与外群体成员相比,内群体成员更有可能被编码为个体并被清晰记住。当前的研究是对预期未来互动在OGB中所起作用的考察。我们进行了两项研究,结果表明预期互动会影响基于群体的面部记忆。在研究1中,我们提供了相关证据,即关于一个人未来与种族外群体成员互动的数量和重要性的信念与OGB相关,也就是说,预期与外群体成员有更多互动的人表现出的OGB有所减少。在研究2中,我们操纵了对与实验室创建的群体未来互动的预期,并观察到与外群体的高水平预期未来互动消除了OGB。因此,社会群体分类在一定程度上驱动了面部记忆偏差,即群体成员身份带来了人际互动的预期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0479/3944439/8e53243c4269/pone.0090668.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0479/3944439/8e53243c4269/pone.0090668.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0479/3944439/8e53243c4269/pone.0090668.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory.预期互动中的差异会导致面部记忆中的内群体偏见。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090668. eCollection 2014.
2
The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.我们当中声名狼藉之人:对不合作的群体成员的声誉记忆增强。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
3
Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior.可视化最小内群体和外群体面孔:对印象、态度和行为的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):897-911. doi: 10.1037/a0036498.
4
Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition.你在还是不在?群体突显在面孔识别中的内群体偏见中的重要性。
Perception. 2020 Jun;49(6):672-687. doi: 10.1177/0301006620918100. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
5
Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.内群体/外群体面部刺激与词汇效价的情境融合:LPP调制与测量的收敛
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jun 26;10:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-69.
6
Embodying an outgroup: the role of racial bias and the effect of multisensory processing in somatosensory remapping.体现一个外群体:种族偏见的作用以及多感官加工在体感重新映射中的影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Nov 18;7:165. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00165. eCollection 2013.
7
An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members.对自己人的关注:对群体内成员眼睛的偏好性注意。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul;107(1):1-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036838.
8
Children's expectations about conventional and moral behaviors of ingroup and outgroup members.儿童对群体内和群体外成员的传统及道德行为的期望。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
9
Attention and Working Memory Biases to Black and Asian Faces During Intergroup Contexts.群体间情境下对黑人和亚洲面孔的注意力及工作记忆偏差
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 9;9:2743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02743. eCollection 2018.
10
What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.是什么驱动了人脸识别记忆中的社会内群体偏见?来自性别内偏见的 ERP 证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):580-90. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst024. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-Group Face Recognition Bias Was Modulated by the Group Status.群体间的人脸识别偏差受群体地位的调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:837836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837836. eCollection 2022.
2
Learning Faces as Concepts Improves Face Recognition by Engaging the Social Brain Network.将面孔作为概念来学习可通过激活社会脑网络来提高人脸识别能力。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 17;17(3):290-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab096.
3
How robust is the own-group face recognition bias? Evidence from first- and second-generation East Asian Canadians.

本文引用的文献

1
A social identity approach to person memory: group membership, collective identification, and social role shape attention and memory.社会认同视角下的个体记忆:群体归属、集体认同和社会角色影响注意和记忆。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Dec;38(12):1566-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167212455829. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
2
Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard).对动机相关面孔进行最低限度暴露后梭状回面孔区的调制:内群体增强(而非外群体忽视)的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3343-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00016. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
东亚第一代和第二代加拿大人群体的自身族群面孔识别偏见有多强?
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233758. eCollection 2020.
4
On the other side of the fence: effects of social categorization and spatial grouping on memory and attention for own-race and other-race faces.另一方面:社会分类和空间分组对本种族和其他种族面孔的记忆与注意力的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e105979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105979. eCollection 2014.
The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit.
范畴化-独特性模型:异族识别缺陷的综合解释。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1168-87. doi: 10.1037/a0020463.
4
Places and faces: Geographic environment influences the ingroup memory advantage.地点与面孔:地理环境影响内群体记忆优势。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):343-55. doi: 10.1037/a0018589.
5
Us and them: memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups.我们与他们:感知模糊群体中的记忆优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):687-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03196822.
6
The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition.跨类别效应:仅仅是社会分类就足以在人脸识别中引发内群体偏见。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):706-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x.
7
A model of the ingroup as a social resource.将内群体视为一种社会资源的模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(4):341-59. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_4.
8
Social cognition: thinking categorically about others.社会认知:对他人进行分类思考。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:93-120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93.
9
Recognition for faces of own and other race.对本族和其他种族面孔的识别。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1969 Dec;13(4):330-4. doi: 10.1037/h0028434.
10
Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes.动机对印象形成的影响:结果依赖性、准确性驱动的注意力和个体化过程。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Sep;53(3):431-44. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.431.