Giese Ellen Cristine
Center for Mineral technology, CETEM/MCTI, Av. Pedro Calmon, 900, Cidade Universitária, CEP:21.941-908, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Extr Ind Soc. 2022 Dec;12:101113. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2022.101113. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
In 2020, many countries endorsed lockdown measures, closed their borders, and practiced social distancing in a bid to contain COVID-19. These moves, however, disrupted global production and supply chains; no economic sector remained fully intact. The pandemic has exposed the vulnerability of supply chains in a globalized world, perhaps none more so than those linked to the distribution of essential raw materials. Minerals are considered raw materials, the extraction of which has important implications for a country's sovereignty and economic autonomy. They are found in abundance in consumer goods such as smartphones, cell phone batteries, computer monitors, cards, and other electrical and electronic products whose useful life has ended. In response to the health and economic problems arising from the current crisis, several countries have moved ahead and outlined post-COVID-19 strategies for the supply of critical metals, over the medium and long term, to reduce their dependence on other states for these commodities. This paper reflects critically on the positioning of the world's large economies, in the face of the COVID-19 crisis, on strategic minerals.
2020年,许多国家批准了封锁措施,关闭边境,并实行社交距离,以遏制新冠疫情。然而,这些举措扰乱了全球生产和供应链;没有哪个经济部门能保持完全完好无损。这场大流行暴露了全球化世界中供应链的脆弱性,或许与基本原材料供应相关的供应链尤为脆弱。矿物被视为原材料,其开采对一个国家的主权和经济自主性具有重要影响。它们大量存在于智能手机、手机电池、电脑显示器、显卡及其他使用寿命已结束的电气和电子产品等消费品中。为应对当前危机引发的健康和经济问题,一些国家已着手制定中长期关键金属供应的新冠后战略,以减少对其他国家供应这些商品的依赖。本文批判性地反思了全球主要经济体在面对新冠疫情危机时对战略矿物的立场。