• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年吸毒者的家庭是“僵化的”:这些家庭是“疏离型”还是“纠缠型”,抑或是两者皆有?

Families of adolescent drug abusers are "rigid": are these families either "disengaged" or "enmeshed," or both?

作者信息

Friedman A S, Utada A, Morrissey M R

出版信息

Fam Process. 1987 Mar;26(1):131-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00131.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00131.x
PMID:3569500
Abstract

The FACES instrument, based on Olson's Circumplex Model of family functioning, was administered to 96 adolescent drug-abuse clients and their parents. The majority of these families categorized themselves as "disengaged" (rather than "enmeshed") on the cohesion dimension, and as "rigid" (rather than "chaotic") on the adaptability dimension. These findings were unexpected as they were substantially different from published findings on families with other types of problems. Family therapists, utilizing Olson's Clinical Rating Scale for the Circumplex Model, characterized significantly more of these same families as "enmeshed," rather than "disengaged." Possible explanations for the difference between the therapists' perceptions and the families' self-perceptions are discussed.

摘要

基于奥尔森家庭功能环状模型的FACES工具,被应用于96名青少年药物滥用患者及其父母身上。在凝聚性维度上,这些家庭中的大多数将自己归类为“疏离型”(而非“缠结型”),在适应性维度上则归类为“刻板型”(而非“混乱型”)。这些发现出乎意料,因为它们与已发表的关于其他类型问题家庭的研究结果有很大不同。家庭治疗师使用奥尔森环状模型临床评定量表,将这些家庭中更多的家庭显著地描述为“缠结型”,而非“疏离型”。文中讨论了治疗师认知与家庭自我认知之间差异的可能解释。

相似文献

1
Families of adolescent drug abusers are "rigid": are these families either "disengaged" or "enmeshed," or both?青少年吸毒者的家庭是“僵化的”:这些家庭是“疏离型”还是“纠缠型”,抑或是两者皆有?
Fam Process. 1987 Mar;26(1):131-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00131.x.
2
Circumplex model of marital and family system: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.婚姻与家庭系统的环状模型:I. 凝聚力与适应性维度、家庭类型及临床应用
Fam Process. 1979 Mar;18(1):3-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x.
3
Theories of family adaptability: toward a synthesis of Olson's Circumplex and the Beavers systems models.
Fam Process. 1988 Mar;27(1):73-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00073.x.
4
[Family environment in eating disorders: a study of the familiar factors influencing the onset and course of eating disorders].[饮食失调中的家庭环境:对影响饮食失调发生和病程的家庭因素的研究]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1999;101(5):427-45.
5
FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study.面容量表第四版和心境环模型:验证研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2011 Jan;37(1):64-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Spanish version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale IV.家庭适应性和凝聚力评估量表第四版的西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):414-420. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.21.
7
The Role of Rigidity in Adaptive and Maladaptive Families Assessed by FACES IV: The Points of View of Adolescents.通过家庭适应与凝聚评价量表第四版(FACES IV)评估的僵化在适应性和适应不良家庭中的作用:青少年的观点
J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(10):2987-2997. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0460-3. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
8
Too close and too rigid: applying the Circumplex Model of Family Systems to first-generation family firms.过于紧密和过于僵化:将家庭系统的循环模型应用于第一代家族企业。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jun;38 Suppl 1:105-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00302.x. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
Beyond the Circumplex model: I. A moratorium on curvilinearity.超越环状模型:I. 对曲线性的暂停
Fam Process. 1994 Dec;33(4):455-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00455.x.
10
The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale III in a Norwegian sample.挪威样本中的家庭适应性与凝聚力量表III
Fam Process. 1994 Jun;33(2):191-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00191.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Brief report: Does "healthy" family functioning look different for families who have a child with autism?简短报告:对于有自闭症孩子的家庭而言,“健康的”家庭功能是否有所不同?
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2020 Apr;72. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101527. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Exploring Triadic Family Relationship Profiles and Their Implications for Adolescents' Early Substance Initiation.探讨三元家庭关系模式及其对青少年早期物质使用的影响。
Prev Sci. 2020 May;21(4):519-529. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01081-7.
3
Family Risk Factors Among Women With Addiction-Related Problems: An Integrative Review.
有成瘾相关问题女性的家庭风险因素:一项综合综述。
Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016 Feb 28;5(2):e27071. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.27071. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Relationship between Family Adaptability, Cohesion and Adolescent Problem Behaviors: Curvilinearity of Circumplex Model.家庭适应性、凝聚力与青少年问题行为之间的关系:环性模型的曲线关系
Korean J Fam Med. 2013 May;34(3):169-77. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.3.169. Epub 2013 May 24.
5
Autonomy and Relatedness in Inner-City Families of Substance Abusing Adolescents.滥用药物青少年的市中心家庭中的自主性与关联性
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2006 Jan 1;15(2):53-86. doi: 10.1300/J029v15n02_04.
6
Family System Test (FAST): the relevance of parental family constructs for clinical intervention.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1996 Fall;27(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02353446.
7
Use of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales in child clinical research.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Feb;19(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00910564.
8
Family functioning and psychopathology among adolescents with severe emotional disturbances.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1992 Feb;20(1):83-102. doi: 10.1007/BF00927118.