• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于情景愤怒法模拟不同照明条件对左转驾驶行为的影响。

Simulating the effect of different lighting conditions on left-turn driving behavior using a scenario-based anger method.

机构信息

College of Movie and Media, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

School of Business, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 13;12(1):9791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13932-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-13932-5
PMID:35697845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9192736/
Abstract

Anger is a key factor affecting drivers' subjective judgment and driving skills. The influence of anger on driving behavior has been widely studied, but there is a lack of comparative research under different lighting conditions. Through a driving simulation experiment, this paper studies the influence of anger on left-turn driving behavior under two light conditions day and night. In the experiment, 32 licensed participants were divided into two groups, one in emotional neutrality and the other in anger. Among them, the emotional state of anger is induced by a traffic-related video. The results showed that compared with daytime participants, participants at night had higher anger intensity, shorter gap acceptance, and post encroachment time (PET) when left-turn driving. In addition, compared with neutral emotion participants, angry participants tended to accept shorter gap acceptance and PET when turning left. This indicates that participants failed to respond correctly to left-turn driving behavior in a state of anger. However, the response of gender differences to situational driving anger was not affected by light conditions. The anger intensity of male participants during the day and night was higher than that of female participants, and the gap between acceptance and PETs during left-turn was shorter than that of female participants. This shows that male participants are more likely to produce high-intensity anger and are more likely to make dangerous driving decisions in a state of anger. This paper puts forward some suggestions on identifying anger and preventing angry driving.

摘要

愤怒是影响驾驶员主观判断和驾驶技能的关键因素。愤怒对驾驶行为的影响已经得到了广泛的研究,但在不同光照条件下的对比研究还比较缺乏。通过驾驶模拟实验,本文研究了在白天和夜间两种光照条件下愤怒对左转驾驶行为的影响。在实验中,32 名有驾照的参与者被分为两组,一组处于情绪中性,另一组处于愤怒状态。其中,愤怒的情绪状态是通过一个与交通相关的视频来诱发的。结果表明,与白天的参与者相比,夜间参与者的愤怒强度更高,左转时的间隙接受时间和后续侵入时间(PET)更短。此外,与情绪中性的参与者相比,愤怒的参与者在左转时更倾向于接受较短的间隙接受时间和 PET。这表明参与者在愤怒状态下无法正确应对左转驾驶行为。然而,性别差异对情境驾驶愤怒的反应不受光照条件的影响。白天和夜间男性参与者的愤怒强度高于女性参与者,左转时的间隙接受时间和 PET 之间的差距也比女性参与者小。这表明男性参与者在愤怒状态下更容易产生高强度的愤怒情绪,并且更有可能做出危险的驾驶决策。本文提出了一些识别愤怒和防止愤怒驾驶的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/dec5ea0e4432/41598_2022_13932_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/17bfd2535770/41598_2022_13932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/cb2c0770d845/41598_2022_13932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/35bffdcdb8ca/41598_2022_13932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/00d678228692/41598_2022_13932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/98a7e3ed1684/41598_2022_13932_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/8245d505403f/41598_2022_13932_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/095e518997ea/41598_2022_13932_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/f386422acf6e/41598_2022_13932_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/dec5ea0e4432/41598_2022_13932_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/17bfd2535770/41598_2022_13932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/cb2c0770d845/41598_2022_13932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/35bffdcdb8ca/41598_2022_13932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/00d678228692/41598_2022_13932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/98a7e3ed1684/41598_2022_13932_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/8245d505403f/41598_2022_13932_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/095e518997ea/41598_2022_13932_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/f386422acf6e/41598_2022_13932_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b81/9192736/dec5ea0e4432/41598_2022_13932_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulating the effect of different lighting conditions on left-turn driving behavior using a scenario-based anger method.基于情景愤怒法模拟不同照明条件对左转驾驶行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 13;12(1):9791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13932-5.
2
Expressing Anger Is More Dangerous than Feeling Angry when Driving.开车时表达愤怒比感到愤怒更危险。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0156948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156948. eCollection 2016.
3
Angry drivers: a test of state-trait theory.愤怒的司机:特质-状态理论的一项测试。
Violence Vict. 2005 Aug;20(4):455-69.
4
Validation of the Driver's Angry Thoughts Questionnaire (DATQ) in a Chinese sample.验证驾驶员愤怒思维问卷(DATQ)在中国样本中的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):362-372. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 May 10.
5
Yellow light decision based on driving style: Day or night?基于驾驶风格的黄灯决策:白天还是夜晚?
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265267. eCollection 2022.
6
Driving anger and metacognition: the role of thought confidence on anger and aggressive driving intentions.驾驶愤怒与元认知:思维自信对愤怒和攻击性驾驶意图的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):323-34. doi: 10.1002/ab.21484. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Negativity bias towards anger in dangerous drivers: Empirical evidence from ERPs.危险驾驶员对愤怒的消极偏见:来自 ERP 的实证证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Jan 1;740:135442. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135442. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
8
Investigating the effect of personality on left-turn behaviors in various scenarios to understand the dynamics of driving styles.研究人格在不同场景下对左转行为的影响,以了解驾驶风格的动态。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(8):801-806. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1673893. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Effect of exposure to aggressive stimuli on aggressive driving behavior at pedestrian crossings at unmarked roadways.暴露于激进刺激下对无标志道路路口行人穿越激进驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Mar;88:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.026. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Anger, aggression, risky behavior, and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers.三组驾驶员的愤怒、攻击性、危险行为及与撞车相关的后果
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Mar;41(3):333-49. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00014-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of anger rumination as a mediator in the relationship between driver moral disengagement and driving angry.愤怒沉思在驾驶员道德脱离与愤怒驾驶关系中作为中介变量的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 5;10(8):e29112. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29112. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Masculinity, femininity, and angry drivers: Masculinity and femininity as moderators between driver anger and anger expression style among young drivers.男子气概、女子气质和愤怒的司机:男子气概和女子气质作为年轻司机中司机愤怒和愤怒表达风格之间的调节变量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106347. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106347. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Evaluation of augmented reality cues to improve the safety of left-turn maneuvers in a connected environment: A driving simulator study.评估增强现实提示在联网环境下提高左转安全性的效果:驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105793. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105793. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
3
Links between observed and self-reported driving anger, observed and self-reported aggressive driving, and personality traits.
观察到的驾驶愤怒与自我报告的驾驶愤怒、观察到的攻击性行为与自我报告的攻击性行为之间的联系,以及人格特质。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jun;140:105516. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105516. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
Nighttime driving: visual, lighting and visibility challenges.夜间驾驶:视觉、照明和可见度挑战。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Mar;40(2):187-201. doi: 10.1111/opo.12659. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
5
Angry Drivers Take Risky Decisions: Evidence from Neurophysiological Assessment.愤怒的司机做出冒险的决策:来自神经生理学评估的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 15;16(10):1701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101701.
6
Safety effects of street lighting on roadway segments: Development of a crash modification function.路灯对路段的安全影响:碰撞修正函数的开发。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(3):296-302. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1573317. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Night-time driving visibility associated with LED streetlight dimming.夜间行车可见度与 LED 路灯调光的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
The influence of bus and taxi drivers' public self-consciousness and social anxiety on aberrant driving behaviors.公交和出租车司机的公众意识和社交焦虑对驾驶行为异常的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
Opportunities and limitations for intersection collision intervention-A study of real world 'left turn across path' accidents.交叉路口碰撞干预的机遇与局限——对现实世界中“左转横穿道路”事故的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):342-355. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
10
Effects of weather conditions, light conditions, and road lighting on vehicle speed.天气状况、光照条件和道路照明对车速的影响。
Springerplus. 2016 Apr 23;5:505. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2124-6. eCollection 2016.