Suppr超能文献

环境影响在医疗服务提供者选择用于治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的吸入器方面的作用:一项离散选择实验。

The role of environmental impact in healthcare providers' choices of inhalers for treatment of asthma and COPD: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Arslan I G, Vervloet M, de Bekker-Grob E W, Hek K, Knottnerus B J, Wagner C, van Eikenhorst L

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 Sep 3;26(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02941-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), often prescribed for the treatment of COPD and asthma have a high global warming potential (GWP) compared to dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft-mist inhalers. Despite calls to switch from high to DPIs or soft-mist inhalers, prescriptions of pMDIs have increased in recent years. Understanding healthcare providers' preferences can help develop strategies to promote prescribing low GWP inhalers. This study aimed to determine healthcare providers' preferences when prescribing inhalers for asthma and COPD, including its GWP (i.e. environmental impact).

METHODS

A survey containing a discrete choice experiment was conducted. Primary care providers were repetitively asked to choose between scenarios of inhalers that differed in five attributes: multidose or unidose system (i.e. ease of use), reduction in number of exacerbations, side effects, out of pocket costs and GWP. A multinomial logit model was used to determine the relative importance of the attributes.

RESULTS

A total of 76 healthcare providers (general practitioners (GPs), nurse specialists and nurse practitioners) completed the survey. On average, the attribute 'reduction in number of exacerbations' was most important in their choice for inhalers, followed by, 'side effects', 'GWP', 'out of pocket costs', and 'multidose or unidose system'. Healthcare providers were willing to accept a high GWP inhaler instead of a low GWP inhaler when the inhaler reduced the number of exacerbations and were willing to opt for low GWP inhaler with higher out of pocket costs instead of a high GWP inhaler with lower out of pocket costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare providers valued clinical factors (i.e. reduction in number of exacerbations and low side effects) as most important when choosing inhalers for their patients with COPD or asthma, however GWP was also an important driver of choice. Understanding these preferences can support strategies to support sustainable inhalers for COPD and asthma, contributing to climate change mitigation. For example by enhancing the provision of information regarding inhaler GWP, while ensuring that clinical effectiveness remains the primary focus.

摘要

背景

与干粉吸入器(DPI)和软雾吸入器相比,常用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘的压力定量吸入器(pMDI)具有较高的全球变暖潜能值(GWP)。尽管有人呼吁从高GWP的pMDI转向DPI或软雾吸入器,但近年来pMDI的处方量仍在增加。了解医疗服务提供者的偏好有助于制定推广低GWP吸入器处方的策略。本研究旨在确定医疗服务提供者在为哮喘和COPD患者开吸入器处方时的偏好,包括其GWP(即环境影响)。

方法

进行了一项包含离散选择实验的调查。反复要求初级医疗服务提供者在不同属性的吸入器场景之间进行选择,这些属性包括:多剂量或单剂量系统(即易用性)、加重次数减少、副作用、自付费用和GWP。使用多项logit模型确定这些属性的相对重要性。

结果

共有76名医疗服务提供者(全科医生(GP)、专科护士和执业护士)完成了调查。平均而言,“加重次数减少”这一属性在他们选择吸入器时最为重要,其次是“副作用”“GWP”“自付费用”以及“多剂量或单剂量系统”。当吸入器能减少加重次数时,医疗服务提供者愿意接受高GWP的吸入器而非低GWP的吸入器;并且愿意选择自付费用较高的低GWP吸入器,而非自付费用较低的高GWP吸入器。

结论

在为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或哮喘患者选择吸入器时,医疗服务提供者认为临床因素(即加重次数减少和低副作用)最为重要,但GWP也是一个重要的选择驱动因素。了解这些偏好有助于支持推广用于COPD和哮喘的可持续吸入器的策略,为缓解气候变化做出贡献。例如,通过增加关于吸入器GWP的信息提供,同时确保临床疗效仍是主要关注点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验