Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;25(10):1579-1598. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0580. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Integrating palliative care services in the home health care (HHC) setting is an important strategy to provide care for seriously ill adults and improve symptom burden, quality of life, and caregiver burden. Routine palliative care in HHC is only possible if clinicians who provide this care are prepared and patients and caregivers are well equipped with the knowledge to receive this care. A key first step in integrating palliative care services within HHC is to measure preparedness of clinicians and readiness of patients and caregivers to receive it. The objective of this systematic review was to review existing literature related to the measurement of palliative care-related knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among HHC clinicians, patients, and caregivers. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane for relevant articles between 2000 and 2021. Articles were included in the final analysis if they (1) reported specifically on palliative care knowledge, attitudes, or confidence, (2) presented measurement tools, instruments, scales, or questionnaires, (3) were conducted in the HHC setting, (4) and included HHC clinicians, patients, or caregivers. Seventeen articles were included. While knowledge, attitudes, and confidence have been studied in HHC clinicians, patients, and caregivers, results varied significantly across countries and health care systems. No study captured knowledge, attitudes, and confidence of the full HHC workforce; notably, home health aides were not included in the studies. Existing instruments did not comprehensively contain elements of the eight domains of palliative care outlined by the National Consensus Project (NCP) for Quality Palliative Care. A comprehensive psychometrically tested instrument to measure palliative care-related knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in the HHC setting is needed.
将姑息治疗服务整合到家庭医疗保健 (HHC) 环境中是为重病成年人提供护理并改善症状负担、生活质量和照顾者负担的重要策略。只有当提供这种护理的临床医生有准备,并且患者和照顾者具备接受这种护理的知识时,HHC 中的常规姑息治疗才成为可能。在 HHC 中整合姑息治疗服务的关键第一步是衡量临床医生的准备情况以及患者和照顾者接受姑息治疗的准备情况。本系统评价的目的是审查与 HHC 临床医生、患者和照顾者的姑息治疗相关知识、态度和信心的测量相关的现有文献。我们在 2000 年至 2021 年间在 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 中搜索了相关文章。如果文章(1)专门报告姑息治疗知识、态度或信心,(2)提出了测量工具、仪器、量表或问卷,(3)在 HHC 环境中进行,并且(4)包括 HHC 临床医生、患者或照顾者,则将其纳入最终分析。有 17 篇文章被纳入。虽然在 HHC 临床医生、患者和照顾者中研究了知识、态度和信心,但结果在不同国家和医疗保健系统之间差异很大。没有研究涵盖整个 HHC 劳动力的知识、态度和信心;值得注意的是,家庭健康助手未包含在研究中。现有的仪器没有全面包含国家共识项目 (NCP) 为优质姑息治疗概述的姑息治疗的八个领域的要素。需要一种在 HHC 环境中测量姑息治疗相关知识、态度和信心的全面、经过心理测量测试的仪器。