• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring Palliative Care-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Home Health Care Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers: A Systematic Review.测量家庭医疗保健临床医生、患者和护理人员的姑息治疗相关知识、态度和信心:系统评价。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;25(10):1579-1598. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0580. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers.早期姑息治疗干预对改善原发性脑恶性肿瘤患者及其照护者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013440.pub2.
3
Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients.干预措施以控制 COVID-19 患者的姑息症状。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 23;8(8):CD015061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015061.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions and Predictors of Transition to Hospice for People Living With Dementia: An Integrative Review.痴呆症患者临终关怀过渡的干预措施及预测因素:一项综合综述。
Gerontologist. 2025 Apr 9;65(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf046.
2
Palliative Nursing in Home Health Care Across the Lifespan.全生命周期家庭医疗保健中的姑息护理
Am J Nurs. 2024 Dec 1;124(12):53-59. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0001095240.11717.87. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
Development of and Testing Novel Questionnaires Assessing Palliative Care-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence Among Home Healthcare Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers.开发和测试评估家庭医疗保健临床医生、患者和护理人员中与姑息治疗相关的知识、态度和信心的新型问卷。
Home Healthc Now. 2025;43(1):21-31. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000001316. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
4
Differences in the knowledge, attitudes, and needs of caregivers and healthcare providers regarding palliative care: a cross-sectional investigation in pediatric settings in China.中国儿科环境中照顾者与医疗服务提供者在姑息治疗方面的知识、态度及需求差异:一项横断面调查
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 6;23(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02052-2.
5
Contributing factors involved in the safety of elderly people with chronic illness in home healthcare: a qualitative study.参与居家医疗中慢性病老年患者安全的影响因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002335.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the concept and approach of palliative care amongst caregivers: a cross-sectional survey in Karachi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇 caregivers 对姑息治疗概念和方法的认知、知识和态度:一项横断面调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 26;19(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00688-w.
2
Association of Receipt of Palliative Care Interventions With Health Care Use, Quality of Life, and Symptom Burden Among Adults With Chronic Noncancer Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.接受姑息治疗干预与慢性非癌症疾病成人的医疗保健使用、生活质量和症状负担的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 13;324(14):1439-1450. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14205.
3
An Adapted Conceptual Model Integrating Palliative Care in Serious Illness and Multiple Chronic Conditions.将舒缓医疗纳入严重疾病和多种慢性病的适应概念模型。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;37(12):1086-1095. doi: 10.1177/1049909120928353. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Overcoming Barriers to Growth in Home-Based Palliative Care.克服居家姑息治疗中的增长障碍。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;22(4):408-412. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0478. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
A Systematic Review in Support of the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, Fourth Edition.支持国家共识项目第四版优质姑息治疗临床实践指南的系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Dec;56(6):831-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
6
National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care Guidelines, 4th Edition.国家共识项目临床实践指南:优质姑息治疗指南,第 4 版。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;21(12):1684-1689. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0431. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
A Review of the Essential Components of Quality Palliative Care in the Home.居家姑息治疗质量的基本要素述评。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(S1):S37-S44. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0392.
8
End-of-life care in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家的临终关怀。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):731. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.185199.
9
Population Health and Tailored Medical Care in the Home: the Roles of Home-Based Primary Care and Home-Based Palliative Care.居家的人群健康与医疗服务:家庭基础医疗护理与家庭姑息治疗的作用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):1041-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a transitional home-based palliative care program for patients with end-stage heart failure.基于过渡性家庭的终末期心力衰竭患者姑息治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):476-484. doi: 10.1177/0269216317706450. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

测量家庭医疗保健临床医生、患者和护理人员的姑息治疗相关知识、态度和信心:系统评价。

Measuring Palliative Care-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Home Health Care Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;25(10):1579-1598. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0580. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2021.0580
PMID:35704053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9639230/
Abstract

Integrating palliative care services in the home health care (HHC) setting is an important strategy to provide care for seriously ill adults and improve symptom burden, quality of life, and caregiver burden. Routine palliative care in HHC is only possible if clinicians who provide this care are prepared and patients and caregivers are well equipped with the knowledge to receive this care. A key first step in integrating palliative care services within HHC is to measure preparedness of clinicians and readiness of patients and caregivers to receive it. The objective of this systematic review was to review existing literature related to the measurement of palliative care-related knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among HHC clinicians, patients, and caregivers. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane for relevant articles between 2000 and 2021. Articles were included in the final analysis if they (1) reported specifically on palliative care knowledge, attitudes, or confidence, (2) presented measurement tools, instruments, scales, or questionnaires, (3) were conducted in the HHC setting, (4) and included HHC clinicians, patients, or caregivers. Seventeen articles were included. While knowledge, attitudes, and confidence have been studied in HHC clinicians, patients, and caregivers, results varied significantly across countries and health care systems. No study captured knowledge, attitudes, and confidence of the full HHC workforce; notably, home health aides were not included in the studies. Existing instruments did not comprehensively contain elements of the eight domains of palliative care outlined by the National Consensus Project (NCP) for Quality Palliative Care. A comprehensive psychometrically tested instrument to measure palliative care-related knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in the HHC setting is needed.

摘要

将姑息治疗服务整合到家庭医疗保健 (HHC) 环境中是为重病成年人提供护理并改善症状负担、生活质量和照顾者负担的重要策略。只有当提供这种护理的临床医生有准备,并且患者和照顾者具备接受这种护理的知识时,HHC 中的常规姑息治疗才成为可能。在 HHC 中整合姑息治疗服务的关键第一步是衡量临床医生的准备情况以及患者和照顾者接受姑息治疗的准备情况。本系统评价的目的是审查与 HHC 临床医生、患者和照顾者的姑息治疗相关知识、态度和信心的测量相关的现有文献。我们在 2000 年至 2021 年间在 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 中搜索了相关文章。如果文章(1)专门报告姑息治疗知识、态度或信心,(2)提出了测量工具、仪器、量表或问卷,(3)在 HHC 环境中进行,并且(4)包括 HHC 临床医生、患者或照顾者,则将其纳入最终分析。有 17 篇文章被纳入。虽然在 HHC 临床医生、患者和照顾者中研究了知识、态度和信心,但结果在不同国家和医疗保健系统之间差异很大。没有研究涵盖整个 HHC 劳动力的知识、态度和信心;值得注意的是,家庭健康助手未包含在研究中。现有的仪器没有全面包含国家共识项目 (NCP) 为优质姑息治疗概述的姑息治疗的八个领域的要素。需要一种在 HHC 环境中测量姑息治疗相关知识、态度和信心的全面、经过心理测量测试的仪器。