• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自助法控制模型选择信息准则的错误概率。

Controlling the error probabilities of model selection information criteria using bootstrapping.

作者信息

Cullan Michael, Lidgard Scott, Sterner Beckett

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Stat. 2019 Dec 18;47(13-15):2565-2581. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1701636. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/02664763.2019.1701636
PMID:35707440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9041880/
Abstract

The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and related information criteria are powerful and increasingly popular tools for comparing multiple, non-nested models without the specification of a null model. However, existing procedures for information-theoretic model selection do not provide explicit and uniform control over error rates for the choice between models, a key feature of classical hypothesis testing. We show how to extend notions of Type-I and Type-II error to more than two models without requiring a null. We then present the Error Control for Information Criteria (ECIC) method, a bootstrap approach to controlling Type-I error using Difference of Goodness of Fit (DGOF) distributions. We apply ECIC to empirical and simulated data in time series and regression contexts to illustrate its value for parametric Neyman-Pearson classification. An R package implementing the bootstrap method is publicly available.

摘要

赤池信息准则(AIC)及相关信息准则是功能强大且日益流行的工具,用于比较多个非嵌套模型,而无需指定零模型。然而,现有的信息论模型选择程序并未像经典假设检验的关键特征那样,对模型间选择的错误率提供明确且统一的控制。我们展示了如何在无需零模型的情况下,将I型和II型错误的概念扩展到两个以上的模型。然后,我们提出了信息准则的错误控制(ECIC)方法,这是一种使用拟合优度差异(DGOF)分布来控制I型错误的自助法。我们将ECIC应用于时间序列和回归背景下的实证数据和模拟数据,以说明其在参数奈曼-皮尔逊分类中的价值。一个实现该自助法的R包已公开发布。

相似文献

1
Controlling the error probabilities of model selection information criteria using bootstrapping.使用自助法控制模型选择信息准则的错误概率。
J Appl Stat. 2019 Dec 18;47(13-15):2565-2581. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1701636. eCollection 2020.
2
Errors in Statistical Inference Under Model Misspecification: Evidence, Hypothesis Testing, and AIC.模型设定错误下统计推断中的误差:证据、假设检验与赤池信息准则
Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00372. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.多重检验。第一部分。控制一般I型错误率的单步程序。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article13. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1040. Epub 2004 Jun 9.
4
Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.参数自举拟合优度检验的I型错误与功效:完全信息与有限信息
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2003 Nov;56(Pt 2):271-88. doi: 10.1348/000711003770480048.
5
Upgrading Model Selection Criteria with Goodness of Fit Tests for Practical Applications.通过拟合优度检验升级实际应用中的模型选择标准。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Apr 15;22(4):447. doi: 10.3390/e22040447.
6
Bootstrap Approximation of Model Selection Probabilities for Multimodel Inference Frameworks.多模型推断框架中模型选择概率的自助法近似
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;26(7):599. doi: 10.3390/e26070599.
7
Empirical extensions of the lasso penalty to reduce the false discovery rate in high-dimensional Cox regression models.套索惩罚的经验性扩展以降低高维Cox回归模型中的错误发现率
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 10;35(15):2561-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.6927. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Goftte: A R package for assessing goodness-of-fit in proportional (sub) distributions hazards regression models.Goftte:用于评估比例(子)分布风险回归模型拟合优度的 R 包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Aug;177:269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Testing goodness of fit of parametric models for censored data.检验删失数据参数模型的拟合优度。
Stat Med. 2012 Sep 20;31(21):2374-85. doi: 10.1002/sim.5368. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
Testing Process Factor Analysis Models Using the Parametric Bootstrap.使用参数 bootstrap 检验过程因子分析模型。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Mar-Apr;53(2):219-230. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1415123. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial to special issue V WCDANM 2018.2018年世界慢性疾病与营养大会特刊社论
J Appl Stat. 2020 Sep 14;47(13-15):2289-2298. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1818489. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Best-subset model selection based on multitudinal assessments of likelihood improvements.基于似然改进的纵向评估的最佳子集模型选择。
J Appl Stat. 2019 Jul 25;47(13-15):2384-2420. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1645097. eCollection 2020.
2
Model Adequacy and Microevolutionary Explanations for Stasis in the Fossil Record.化石记录中停滞现象的模型充分性与微观进化解释。
Am Nat. 2018 Apr;191(4):509-523. doi: 10.1086/696265. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
3
Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy: Or How the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Controversy Resulted in the Inferential Tail Wagging the Measurement Dog.显著性检验需要一种分类法:或者说费希尔与奈曼 - 皮尔逊之争如何导致推断结果本末倒置。
Psychol Rep. 2016 Oct;119(2):487-504. doi: 10.1177/0033294116662659. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Simple versus complex models of trait evolution and stasis as a response to environmental change.作为对环境变化的响应,性状进化与停滞的简单模型与复杂模型
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):4885-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403662111.
5
Estimation and Accuracy after Model Selection.模型选择后的估计与准确性。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2014 Jul 1;109(507):991-1007. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2013.823775.
6
Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC.生态学家的模型选择:AIC和BIC的世界观
Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):631-6. doi: 10.1890/13-1452.1.
7
Evolutionary mode routinely varies among morphological traits within fossil species lineages.化石物种谱系内的形态特征的进化模式通常会发生变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20520-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209901109. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
8
The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages.在化石谱系演化中,方向变化、随机游走和停滞的相对重要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18404-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704088104. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
9
Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests.系统发育学中的模型选择与模型平均:赤池信息准则和贝叶斯方法相对于似然比检验的优势
Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):793-808. doi: 10.1080/10635150490522304.
10
AIC model selection using Akaike weights.使用赤池权重进行AIC模型选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):192-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03206482.