• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用具有多测量特征的静息态功能磁共振成像功能脑网络以及结构磁共振成像的海马亚区和杏仁核体积进行阿尔茨海默病诊断和生物标志物分析

Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield and Amygdala Volume of Structural MRI.

作者信息

Khatri Uttam, Kwon Goo-Rak

机构信息

Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 30;14:818871. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.818871. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2022.818871
PMID:35707703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9190953/
Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of the initial phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is essential and crucial. The objective of this research was to employ efficient biomarkers for the diagnostic analysis and classification of AD based on combining structural MRI (sMRI) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). So far, several anatomical MRI imaging markers for AD diagnosis have been identified. The use of cortical and subcortical volumes, the hippocampus, and amygdala volume, as well as genetic patterns, has proven to be beneficial in distinguishing patients with AD from the healthy population. The fMRI time series data have the potential for specific numerical information as well as dynamic temporal information. Voxel and graphical analyses have gained popularity for analyzing neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's and its prodromal phase, mild cognitive impairment (MCI). So far, these approaches have been utilized separately for the diagnosis of AD. In recent studies, the classification of cases of MCI into those that are not converted for a certain period as stable MCI (MCIs) and those that converted to AD as MCIc has been less commonly reported with inconsistent results. In this study, we verified and validated the potency of a proposed diagnostic framework to identify AD and differentiate MCIs from MCIc by utilizing the efficient biomarkers obtained from sMRI, along with functional brain networks of the frequency range .01-.027 at the resting state and the voxel-based features. The latter mainly included default mode networks (amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation [ALFF], fractional ALFF [ALFF], and regional homogeneity [ReHo]), degree centrality (DC), and salience networks (SN). Pearson's correlation coefficient for measuring fMRI functional networks has proven to be an efficient means for disease diagnosis. We applied the graph theory to calculate nodal features (nodal degree [ND], nodal path length [NL], and between centrality [BC]) as a graphical feature and analyzed the connectivity link between different brain regions. We extracted three-dimensional (3D) patterns to calculate regional coherence and then implement a univariate statistical -test to access a 3D mask that preserves voxels showing significant changes. Similarly, from sMRI, we calculated the hippocampal subfield and amygdala nuclei volume using Freesurfer (version 6). Finally, we implemented and compared the different feature selection algorithms to integrate the structural features, brain networks, and voxel features to optimize the diagnostic identifications of AD using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. We also compared the performance of SVM with Random Forest (RF) classifiers. The obtained results demonstrated the potency of our framework, wherein a combination of the hippocampal subfield, the amygdala volume, and brain networks with multiple measures of rs-fMRI could significantly enhance the accuracy of other approaches in diagnosing AD. The accuracy obtained by the proposed method was reported for binary classification. More importantly, the classification results of the less commonly reported MCIs vs. MCIc improved significantly. However, this research involved only the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort to focus on the diagnosis of AD advancement by integrating sMRI and fMRI. Hence, the study's primary disadvantage is its small sample size. In this case, the dataset we utilized did not fully reflect the whole population. As a result, we cannot guarantee that our findings will be applicable to other populations.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/cedce1e3d3ca/fnagi-14-818871-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/0d808365379d/fnagi-14-818871-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/5d110e260646/fnagi-14-818871-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/e1b5b7b5c05a/fnagi-14-818871-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/5d20691bb24b/fnagi-14-818871-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/70697f96a1ae/fnagi-14-818871-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/4a8dba67ce29/fnagi-14-818871-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/b4dcc02f1cab/fnagi-14-818871-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/9dce3cd7c6c5/fnagi-14-818871-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/8e8567489680/fnagi-14-818871-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/9b27cd543e30/fnagi-14-818871-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/cedce1e3d3ca/fnagi-14-818871-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/0d808365379d/fnagi-14-818871-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/5d110e260646/fnagi-14-818871-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/e1b5b7b5c05a/fnagi-14-818871-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/5d20691bb24b/fnagi-14-818871-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/70697f96a1ae/fnagi-14-818871-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/4a8dba67ce29/fnagi-14-818871-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/b4dcc02f1cab/fnagi-14-818871-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/9dce3cd7c6c5/fnagi-14-818871-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/8e8567489680/fnagi-14-818871-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/9b27cd543e30/fnagi-14-818871-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14cf/9190953/cedce1e3d3ca/fnagi-14-818871-g011.jpg
摘要

准确诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)的初始阶段至关重要。本研究的目的是基于结构磁共振成像(sMRI)和静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)相结合,采用有效的生物标志物对AD进行诊断分析和分类。到目前为止,已经确定了几种用于AD诊断的解剖学磁共振成像标记物。使用皮质和皮质下体积、海马体和杏仁核体积以及基因模式,已被证明有助于区分AD患者和健康人群。功能磁共振成像时间序列数据具有特定数值信息和动态时间信息的潜力。体素分析和图形分析在分析神经退行性疾病(如阿尔茨海默病及其前驱期轻度认知障碍(MCI))方面越来越受欢迎。到目前为止,这些方法已分别用于AD的诊断。在最近的研究中,将MCI病例分为在一定时期内未转化为稳定MCI(MCIs)的病例和转化为AD的MCIc病例的分类报告较少,结果也不一致。在本研究中,我们通过利用从sMRI获得的有效生物标志物,以及静息状态下频率范围为0.01 - 0.027的脑功能网络和基于体素的特征,验证并确认了所提出的诊断框架识别AD以及区分MCIs和MCIc的效力。后者主要包括默认模式网络(低频波动幅度[ALFF]、分数ALFF[ALFF]和局部一致性[ReHo])、度中心性(DC)和突显网络(SN)。用于测量功能磁共振成像功能网络的皮尔逊相关系数已被证明是疾病诊断的有效手段。我们应用图论来计算节点特征(节点度[ND]、节点路径长度[NL]和介数中心性[BC])作为图形特征,并分析不同脑区之间的连接关系。我们提取三维(3D)模式以计算区域一致性,然后实施单变量统计检验以获取保留显示显著变化体素的3D掩码。同样,从sMRI中,我们使用Freesurfer(版本6)计算海马亚区和杏仁核体积。最后,我们实施并比较了不同的特征选择算法,以整合结构特征、脑网络和体素特征,使用支持向量机(SVM)分类器优化AD的诊断识别。我们还将SVM的性能与随机森林(RF)分类器进行了比较。获得的结果证明了我们框架的效力,其中海马亚区、杏仁核体积和具有多种rs-fMRI测量值的脑网络的组合可以显著提高其他方法诊断AD的准确性。所提出方法获得的准确性是针对二元分类报告的。更重要的是,较少报告的MCIs与MCIc的分类结果有显著改善。然而,本研究仅涉及阿尔茨海默病神经成像计划(ADNI)队列,以通过整合sMRI和fMRI来关注AD进展的诊断。因此,该研究的主要缺点是样本量小。在这种情况下,我们使用的数据集没有完全反映整个人口。因此,我们不能保证我们的发现将适用于其他人群。

相似文献

1
Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield and Amygdala Volume of Structural MRI.使用具有多测量特征的静息态功能磁共振成像功能脑网络以及结构磁共振成像的海马亚区和杏仁核体积进行阿尔茨海默病诊断和生物标志物分析
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 30;14:818871. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.818871. eCollection 2022.
2
Classification and Graphical Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease and Its Prodromal Stage Using Multimodal Features From Structural, Diffusion, and Functional Neuroimaging Data and the APOE Genotype.利用来自结构、扩散和功能神经影像数据以及APOE基因型的多模态特征对阿尔茨海默病及其前驱期进行分类和图形分析。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Jul 30;12:238. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00238. eCollection 2020.
3
Predicting MCI to AD Conversation Using Integrated sMRI and rs-fMRI: Machine Learning and Graph Theory Approach.使用整合的结构磁共振成像和静息态功能磁共振成像预测轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病的转变:机器学习与图论方法
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Jul 30;13:688926. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.688926. eCollection 2021.
4
Prediction and Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Based on Combined Features From Apolipoprotein-E Genotype, Cerebrospinal Fluid, MR, and FDG-PET Imaging Biomarkers.基于载脂蛋白E基因型、脑脊液、磁共振成像和氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像生物标志物联合特征的阿尔茨海默病预测与分类
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;13:72. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00072. eCollection 2019.
5
An Efficient Combination among sMRI, CSF, Cognitive Score, and 4 Biomarkers for Classification of AD and MCI Using Extreme Learning Machine.基于极端学习机的 sMRI、CSF、认知评分和 4 种生物标志物在 AD 和 MCI 分类中的有效组合。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020 Jun 4;2020:8015156. doi: 10.1155/2020/8015156. eCollection 2020.
6
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using combined features from voxel-based morphometry and cortical, subcortical, and hippocampus regions of MRI T1 brain images.基于体素形态测量学和 MRI T1 脑图像的皮质、皮质下和海马区的联合特征对阿尔茨海默病的早期诊断。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0222446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222446. eCollection 2019.
7
Identification of the Early Stage of Alzheimer's Disease Using Structural MRI and Resting-State fMRI.使用结构磁共振成像和静息态功能磁共振成像识别阿尔茨海默病的早期阶段
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 30;10:904. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00904. eCollection 2019.
8
Predicting conversion from MCI to AD by integrating rs-fMRI and structural MRI.通过整合 rs-fMRI 和结构 MRI 预测 MCI 向 AD 的转化。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Nov 1;102:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
9
Voxel-wise Fusion of Resting fMRI Networks and Gray Matter Volume for Alzheimer's Disease Classification using Deep Multimodal Learning.使用深度多模态学习对静息态功能磁共振成像网络和灰质体积进行体素级融合以用于阿尔茨海默病分类
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 13:rs.3.rs-3740218. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3740218/v1.
10
Hybrid multivariate pattern analysis combined with extreme learning machine for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis using multi-measure rs-fMRI spatial patterns.基于多模态 rs-fMRI 空间模式的混合多元模式分析结合极限学习机在阿尔茨海默病诊断中的应用。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212582. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Early-stage diagnosis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders via multiple learning models based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.基于静息态功能磁共振成像的多种学习模型对HIV相关神经认知障碍的早期诊断
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):7989-8007. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-290. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
Evaluating the Impact of 2D MRI Slice Orientation and Location on Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using a Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network.使用轻量级卷积神经网络评估二维磁共振成像切片方向和位置对阿尔茨海默病诊断的影响。
J Imaging. 2025 Aug 5;11(8):260. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11080260.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting MCI to AD Conversation Using Integrated sMRI and rs-fMRI: Machine Learning and Graph Theory Approach.使用整合的结构磁共振成像和静息态功能磁共振成像预测轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病的转变:机器学习与图论方法
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Jul 30;13:688926. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.688926. eCollection 2021.
2
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Using Brain Network.利用脑网络诊断阿尔茨海默病
Front Neurosci. 2021 Feb 5;15:605115. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.605115. eCollection 2021.
3
Distinct BOLD variability changes in the default mode and salience networks in Alzheimer's disease spectrum and associations with cognitive decline.
Mind the Gap: Does Brain Age Improve Alzheimer's Disease Prediction?
注意差距:脑龄能否改善阿尔茨海默病的预测?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 15;46(12):e70276. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70276.
4
Reducing the acquisition time for magnetic resonance imaging using super-resolution image generation and evaluating the accuracy of hippocampal volumes for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease.利用超分辨率图像生成技术缩短磁共振成像的采集时间,并评估海马体体积在诊断阿尔茨海默病中的准确性。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 15;16:1507722. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1507722. eCollection 2025.
5
Changes of functional brain network topology associated with nutritional indicator of patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.复发性重度抑郁症患者功能脑网络拓扑结构与营养指标的相关性变化
Front Nutr. 2025 Jun 18;12:1615978. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1615978. eCollection 2025.
6
Brain structural alterations in young women with premature ovarian insufficiency: Implications for dementia risk.卵巢早衰年轻女性的脑结构改变:对痴呆风险的影响。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Mar;21(3):e70111. doi: 10.1002/alz.70111.
7
Altered spatiotemporal consistency and their genetic mechanisms in mild cognitive impairment: a combined neuroimaging and transcriptome study.轻度认知障碍中时空一致性的改变及其遗传机制:一项神经影像学与转录组联合研究
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Feb 5;35(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf045.
8
Differences in cerebral structure among patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and patients with Alzheimer's disease.遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者与阿尔茨海默病患者大脑结构的差异。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Dec 4;16:1453051. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1453051. eCollection 2024.
9
Neuroimaging techniques, gene therapy, and gut microbiota: frontier advances and integrated applications in Alzheimer's Disease research.神经成像技术、基因治疗与肠道微生物群:阿尔茨海默病研究中的前沿进展与综合应用
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Dec 3;16:1485657. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1485657. eCollection 2024.
10
fMRI-based Alzheimer's disease detection via functional connectivity analysis: a systematic review.基于功能磁共振成像的阿尔茨海默病检测:通过功能连接分析的系统综述。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Oct 16;10:e2302. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2302. eCollection 2024.
阿尔茨海默病谱中默认模式和突显网络中 BOLD 变异性的明显变化及其与认知衰退的关系。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 15;10(1):6457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63540-4.
4
2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2020年阿尔茨海默病事实与数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Mar 10. doi: 10.1002/alz.12068.
5
A multi-model deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer's disease.一种用于阿尔茨海默病中海马自动分割和分类的多模态深度卷积神经网络。
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116459. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Classification of Early and Late Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Functional Brain Network of Resting-State fMRI.利用静息态功能磁共振成像的脑功能网络对早期和晚期轻度认知障碍进行分类
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 27;10:572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00572. eCollection 2019.
7
Evaluating the performance of a predictive modeling approach to identifying members at high-risk of hospitalization.评估一种预测建模方法在识别高住院风险成员方面的性能。
J Med Econ. 2020 Mar;23(3):228-234. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1666854. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Prevalence of Biologically vs Clinically Defined Alzheimer Spectrum Entities Using the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Research Framework.使用美国国立衰老研究所-阿尔茨海默病协会研究框架对生物学定义与临床定义的阿尔茨海默病谱系实体的患病率进行研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Oct 1;76(10):1174-1183. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1971.
9
Default Mode Network Complexity and Cognitive Decline in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.轻度阿尔茨海默病中默认模式网络复杂性与认知衰退
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 23;12:770. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00770. eCollection 2018.
10
The Volume of Hippocampal Subfields in Relation to Decline of Memory Recall Across the Adult Lifespan.海马亚区体积与成年期记忆回忆衰退的关系。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Oct 10;10:320. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00320. eCollection 2018.