Dannevig Halvor, Korsbrekke Mari Hanssen, Hovelsrud Grete K
Western Norway Research Institute, P.O Box 163, 6851 Sogndal, Norway.
Nordland Research Institute, Universitetsallèen 11, 8049 Bodø, Norway.
Clim Risk Manag. 2022;36:None. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100438.
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is a new discursive regime that encompasses global environmental change challenges and sustainability sciences, including adaptation to climate change. Co-production of knowledge has become a key, intrinsic component in both sustainability sciences and adaptation research. In this review article, we investigate if and how the SDG agenda is included in the application of participatory approaches and co-production of knowledge for climate change adaptation. We review findings from such processes in projects whose objective is to foster adaptation in the context of SDGs and to categorize the methods employed to forward co-production. We investigate 1) whether and how co-production approaches localize SDG targets and address tradeoffs and synergies, 2) whether they focus on power asymmetries and political dimensions in such participatory processes, and 3) whether and how the literature show that the SDG agenda contributes to a shift in the role of researchers towards a more interventionist approach to co-production. Our results show that there is little evidence that the SDG agenda contributes to a shift towards more interventionist or transformative approaches within climate change adaptation. Further, we have a identified a missed opportunity in the exclusion of "social" SDGs (SDG 5 and 10) in the discussions of adaptation and co-production and SGDs. Most importantly, we find that participatory efforts, including the co-production of knowledge, for localizing SDG goals and resolving tradeoffs and benefits, are the most salient aspects that tie the three co-production - adaptation - the SDG agenda together. Such participatory localizing processes have a great potential in facilitating long-enduring empowerment and legitimacy in adaptation efforts.
联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)是一种新的话语体系,涵盖了全球环境变化挑战和可持续性科学,包括适应气候变化。知识的共同生产已成为可持续性科学和适应研究的关键内在组成部分。在这篇综述文章中,我们调查了可持续发展目标议程是否以及如何被纳入参与式方法的应用和气候变化适应知识的共同生产中。我们回顾了此类项目过程中的研究结果,这些项目的目标是在可持续发展目标的背景下促进适应,并对用于推进共同生产的方法进行分类。我们调查:1)共同生产方法是否以及如何将可持续发展目标本地化,并处理权衡和协同效应;2)它们是否关注此类参与式过程中的权力不对称和政治层面;3)文献是否以及如何表明可持续发展目标议程有助于研究人员的角色向更具干预性的共同生产方法转变。我们的结果表明,几乎没有证据表明可持续发展目标议程有助于在气候变化适应中转向更具干预性或变革性的方法。此外,我们发现,在适应与共同生产以及可持续发展目标的讨论中排除“社会”可持续发展目标(目标5和目标10)是一个错失的机会。最重要的是,我们发现,包括知识共同生产在内的参与式努力,对于将可持续发展目标本地化以及解决权衡和收益问题而言,是将共同生产、适应与可持续发展目标议程联系在一起的最显著方面。此类参与式本地化过程在促进适应努力中持久的赋权和合法性方面具有巨大潜力。