Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情时代的疫苗犹豫与错误信息:来自过去的教训

Vaccine hesitancy, misinformation in the era of Covid-19: Lessons from the past.

作者信息

Orsini D, Bianucci R, Galassi F M, Lippi D, Martini M

机构信息

University Museum System of Siena (SIMUS), History of Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Department of Cultures and Societies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Ethics Med Public Health. 2022 Oct;24:100812. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100812. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the world has challenged/argued with the Covid-19 pandemic over the last two years, there has been an increase in vaccine misinformation. Although immunity against Covid-19 infection is limited to 4-6 months and requires at least three doses of vaccine to be maximally effective, the current vaccination campaign in industrialized countries shows that vaccinated citizens experience greater immunological protection against severe forms of the disease than unvaccinated citizens.

METHODOLOGY

A perusal of the literature was performed in order to reconstruct the communication methods applied in the managing of the Covid-19 pandemic; the management of the current pandemic was compared with the management of another scourge of the past: poliomyelitis.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION: In order to raise public awareness on public health issues, it is essential that governments and institutions communicate scientific data to all sections of the population in an unambiguous way. In this sense, it is essential to apply "prebunking", which is a layered defense system available to society that prevents misinformation before it is spread. This is to avoid the subsequent debunking of false information, which generates insecurity and fuels fears. Belief in medical misinformation represents a meaningful problem for public health efforts to fight Covid-19 through vaccination.

CONCLUSION/PERSPECTIVES: In this sense an example of proper management of one of the many epidemics of the recent past, poliomyelitis, should make us reflect on the effectiveness of past approaches. This testimony from the past can provide us with food for thought regarding how to face the present Covid-19 pandemic and to prepare for the future. Certainly, it shows us how the awful pandemics/epidemics from the past was handled and finally overcome, despite perceived risk and vaccine hesitancy.

摘要

背景

在过去两年里,随着全球与新冠疫情作斗争,疫苗错误信息有所增加。尽管新冠病毒感染免疫力的持续时间限制在4至6个月,且至少需要接种三剂疫苗才能达到最大效果,但工业化国家目前的疫苗接种活动表明,接种疫苗的公民比未接种疫苗的公民在预防该疾病严重形式方面具有更强的免疫保护。

方法

查阅文献以重建新冠疫情管理中所采用的沟通方式;将当前疫情的管理与过去另一场灾难:小儿麻痹症的管理进行比较。

结果/讨论:为提高公众对公共卫生问题的认识,政府和机构必须以明确无误的方式向各阶层民众传达科学数据。从这个意义上说,应用“预先辟谣”至关重要,这是社会可用的一种分层防御系统,可在错误信息传播之前加以预防。这是为了避免随后对虚假信息进行辟谣,因为这会产生不安全感并加剧恐惧。相信医学错误信息对通过接种疫苗抗击新冠疫情的公共卫生努力而言是一个重大问题。

结论/展望:从这个意义上说,近期众多疫情之一——小儿麻痹症——的妥善管理实例应促使我们反思过去方法的有效性。过去的这个例证能为我们思考如何应对当前的新冠疫情以及为未来做准备提供思考素材。当然,它向我们展示了尽管存在可感知的风险和疫苗犹豫情绪,过去那些可怕的大流行病是如何得到应对并最终被克服的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Historical and Social Considerations upon Tuberculosis.关于结核病的历史与社会考量
J Prev Med Hyg. 2025 May 31;66(1):E145-E152. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3465. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
The fight against smallpox during the Savoy kingdom in Genoa between 1815 and 1859.1815 年至 1859 年,撒丁王国热那亚时期与天花的斗争。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Aug 31;65(2):E296-E302. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.2.3335. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
A historical and palaeopathological perspective on cancer.癌症的历史和古病理学视角。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Mar 31;65(1):E93-E97. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.1.3221. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

6
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期的疫苗犹豫
Public Health. 2021 May;194:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19.防范关于新冠病毒的虚假消息
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:566790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790. eCollection 2020.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验