Czypionka Thomas, Iftekhar Emil N, Prainsack Barbara, Priesemann Viola, Bauer Simon, Calero Valdez André, Cuschieri Sarah, Glaab Enrico, Grill Eva, Krutzinna Jenny, Lionis Christos, Machado Helena, Martins Carlos, Pavlakis George N, Perc Matjaž, Petelos Elena, Pickersgill Martyn, Skupin Alexander, Schernhammer Eva, Szczurek Ewa, Tsiodras Sotirios, Willeit Peter, Wilmes Paul
Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria, and London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Feb;13:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100294. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
In the summer of 2021, European governments removed most NPIs after experiencing prolonged second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most countries failed to achieve immunization rates high enough to avoid resurgence of the virus. Public health strategies for autumn and winter 2021 have ranged from countries aiming at low incidence by re-introducing NPIs to accepting high incidence levels. However, such high incidence strategies almost certainly lead to the very consequences that they seek to avoid: restrictions that harm people and economies. At high incidence, the important pandemic containment measure 'test-trace-isolate-support' becomes inefficient. At that point, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its numerous harmful consequences can likely only be controlled through restrictions. We argue that all European countries need to pursue a low incidence strategy in a coordinated manner. Such an endeavour can only be successful if it is built on open communication and trust.
2021年夏天,在经历了新冠疫情的第二波和第三波长期冲击后,欧洲各国政府取消了大部分非药物干预措施。大多数国家未能实现足够高的免疫率以避免病毒卷土重来。2021年秋冬的公共卫生策略各不相同,有的国家旨在通过重新引入非药物干预措施来实现低发病率,有的则接受高发病率水平。然而,这种高发病率策略几乎肯定会导致它们试图避免的后果:对人和经济造成损害的限制措施。在高发病率情况下,重要的疫情防控措施“检测-追踪-隔离-支持”变得效率低下。到那时,新冠病毒的传播及其众多有害后果可能只能通过限制措施来控制。我们认为,所有欧洲国家都需要以协调一致的方式推行低发病率策略。只有建立在开放沟通和信任的基础上,这样的努力才可能成功。