Velcea Andreea Elena, Baldea Sorina Mihaila, Cinteza Mircea, Vinereanu Dragos
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Mar;17(1):4-13. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.1.4.
Left atrium (LA) assessment has gained significant interest in recent years because of its diagnostic and prognostic role in cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) versus two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) for LA volumes (LAV) when measurements were performed by users with different levels of expertise in 3DE. We prospectively recruited 35 consecutive patients referred to our echocardiography laboratory. Subjects underwent two separate 2DE and 3DE acquisitions of the LA in the same day by different users. Left atrial volumes were measured by the two users, who had similar levels of training in 2DE but different levels of training in 3DE - one advanced user and one beginner user. Our results showed a good intra-observer reproducibility for 2DE (r=0.98) and an equally good reproducibility for 3DE LAVs when measured by the beginner user (r=0.97). Similarly, there was a good inter-observer reproducibility for the 2DE LAVs when measured by observers with similar levels of expertise in 2DE (r=0.98). However, similarly reproducible results were obtained for the 3DE LAVs when measured by users with significantly different levels of training in 3DE (r=0.98). Furthermore, there was a lower, yet acceptable (r>0.8), reproducibility for the 2DE LAVs when measured on separately acquired datasets by users who acquired the respective datasets, both with advanced level of training in 2DE. However, reproducibility was superior for 3DE LAVs when measured by the beginner and advanced users in 3DE (r=0.97). We conclude that 3DE is a technique that promises to improve patients' overall assessment, showing a good feasibility and better reproducibility than 2DE for the measurement of LAVs, regardless of level of training in the method.
近年来,由于左心房(LA)在心血管疾病中的诊断和预后作用,对其评估受到了广泛关注。我们旨在评估三维超声心动图(3DE)与二维超声心动图(2DE)在测量左心房容积(LAV)时的可行性和可重复性,测量由具有不同3DE专业水平的用户进行。我们前瞻性地连续招募了35名转诊至我们超声心动图实验室的患者。受试者在同一天由不同用户分别进行两次独立的2DE和3DE左心房图像采集。两名用户测量左心房容积,他们在2DE方面的培训水平相似,但在3DE方面的培训水平不同——一名高级用户和一名初级用户。我们的结果显示,2DE的观察者内重复性良好(r = 0.98),初级用户测量3DE的LAV时重复性同样良好(r = 0.97)。同样,由2DE专业水平相似的观察者测量2DE的LAV时,观察者间重复性良好(r = 0.98)。然而,由3DE培训水平差异显著的用户测量3DE的LAV时,也获得了相似的可重复性结果(r = 0.98)。此外,当由在2DE方面均具有高级培训水平的用户在分别采集的数据集上测量2DE的LAV时,重复性较低,但仍可接受(r>0.8)。然而,当由3DE的初级和高级用户测量3DE的LAV时,重复性更佳(r = 0.97)。我们得出结论,3DE是一种有望改善患者整体评估的技术,在测量LAV方面,无论对该方法的培训水平如何,其均显示出良好的可行性且比2DE具有更好的可重复性。