Hyperlipidemia and Platelet Parameters: Two Sides of the Same Coin.

INTRODUCTION

Hyperlipidemia is a disorder in which lipid and cholesterol levels in the blood are elevated. Diabetes, coronary heart disease, obesity, and hypertension are commonly linked to hyperlipidemia. Despite this, hyperlipidemia is a widely neglected illness, owing to its asymptomatic nature, ignorance of aberrant lipid profiles on screening, and economic issues in poor countries such as India. Platelets have been shown to have a role in the thrombus consequences of atheromatous damage in hyperlipidemic individuals by initiating and propagating atherosclerotic plaques. Platelets with bigger diameters are thought to be more metabolically, enzymatically, and functionally agile than platelets with lower sizes. In steady-state operation, these bigger platelets release more thromboxane B2 than regular platelets. Platelets with bigger sizes are more hemostatically active and hence have a higher chance of forming a thrombus and thromboembolism. The aim of this study was to compare the values of key platelet parameters and platelet function in hyperlipidemic patients with normal age and sex-matched controls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 100 individuals were included in this study, with 68 cases of hyperlipidemia and 32 controls having normal lipid profiles. Platelet volume indices (PVI) such as platelet count (PC), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR), plateletcrit (PCT), and platelet function (platelet aggregation with adenosine diphosphate, ADP) were compared between hyperlipidemia patients and age sex-matched controls with normal lipid profiles.

RESULTS

The cases had a statistically significant higher mean MPV (10.55 ± 1.81), PDW (14.93 ± 2.82), and P-LCR (30.97 ± 11.74) compared to mean MPV (9.35 ± 1.85), PDW (13.10 ± 2.60), and P-LCR (25.13 ± 12.23) of controls (p-value < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the study group and control group with respect to mean PC and PCT (p-value > 0.05). In this study, there was a statistically significant increase noted in platelet aggregation percentage in hyperlipidemic patients than in the control group (42.03 ± 25.28 vs 31.25 ± 15.11) (p-value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To conclude, platelet parameters are a significant, easy, and cost-effective method for predicting future acute episodes in hyperlipidemic patients that should be utilized more widely. To avoid vascular events, these individuals may require higher antiplatelet dosages and more rigorous hyperlipidemia therapy.