Suppr超能文献

化学干预措施对减少登革热、寨卡病毒病和基孔肯雅热的影响:一项系统评价

Impact of chemical interventions on reducing dengue, Zika, and chikungunya: a systematic review.

作者信息

Tortosa-La Osa Silvia, Roldán-Coronel Sandra, Martín-Ruiz Eva, Galán-Relaño Ángela, Olry de Labry-Lima Antonio

机构信息

Inter-University Doctorate Program in Health Sciences University of Seville Spain Inter-University Doctorate Program in Health Sciences, University of Seville, Spain.

Health Delegation Andalusian Government Almeria Spain Health Delegation, Andalusian Government, Almeria, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 May 27;49:e51. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.51. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Given that vector control represents the primary strategy for preventing these diseases, the objective of this systematic review is to ascertain the efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing their burden.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for experimental studies published between 1987 and 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Medline, Embase, WOS-Core Collection, Scopus, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, and Biological Science Database were consulted to identify studies using incidence or prevalence as outcome variables of interest.

RESULTS

Of the 2 232 references initially retrieved, 8 articles were included in the review. All studies used entomological indices along with disease burden indices to measure intervention impact. Three studies evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated curtains alone, one combined those with residual insecticide treatment in dwellings, one evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated school uniforms, and the remaining three evaluated household insecticide application. Only four of the eight articles showed some level of efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing dengue prevalence or incidence.

CONCLUSION

The chemical interventions under examination did not result in a notable reduction in the burden of these diseases within the population, which would appear contradictory given the prominent role of chemical interventions in vector-borne disease control programs.

摘要

目的

鉴于病媒控制是预防这些疾病的主要策略,本系统评价的目的是确定化学干预措施在减轻其负担方面的效果。

方法

遵循PRISMA指南,检索1987年至2024年间以英文、葡萄牙文和西班牙文发表的实验研究。查阅了Medline、Embase、WOS核心合集、Scopus、Lilacs、Cochrane图书馆和生物科学数据库,以确定将发病率或患病率作为感兴趣的结局变量的研究。

结果

在最初检索的2232篇参考文献中,有8篇文章被纳入综述。所有研究都使用昆虫学指标以及疾病负担指标来衡量干预效果。三项研究单独评估了使用杀虫剂浸渍蚊帐的情况,一项将其与住宅内的残留杀虫剂处理相结合进行评估,一项评估了使用杀虫剂浸渍校服的情况,其余三项评估了家庭杀虫剂的应用。八篇文章中只有四篇显示化学干预措施在降低登革热患病率或发病率方面有一定程度的效果。

结论

所研究的化学干预措施并未使这些疾病在人群中的负担显著减轻,鉴于化学干预措施在病媒传播疾病控制项目中的突出作用,这似乎相互矛盾。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ef5/12109137/840081a9792e/rpsp-49-e51-Figure1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验