Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Chiba Rosai Hospital, 2-16, Tatsumidaihigashi, Ichihara, Chiba, 290-0003, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14444-y.
To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept with three loading doses + pro re nata regimen combined with subthreshold laser application to that of IVA monotherapy on eyes with diabetic macular edema. This was a phase 4 clinical trial with a prospective, randomized, and parallel investigator-driven protocol. Patients with DME were randomly assigned to the IVA monotherapy group (n = 25) or the IVA + SL combination therapy group (n = 26). The main outcome measures were the number of IVA injections and the changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central retinal thickness (CRT) at the final evaluation at 96 weeks. The mean number of IVA injections in the monotherapy group was 5.86 ± 2.43 and it was 6.05 ± 2.73 in the IVA + SL group at 96 weeks, and this difference was not significant (P = 0.83). The differences in the mean changes of the CRT (P = 0.17) and the BCVA (P = 0.31) were also not significant between the two groups throughout the follow-up period. We conclude that adjunct of SL to anti-VEGF therapy does not reduce the number of necessary intravitreal injections.
比较玻璃体内注射阿柏西普三种负荷剂量+即刻治疗方案联合阈下激光应用与玻璃体内注射抗 VEGF 药物单药治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性。这是一项 4 期临床试验,采用前瞻性、随机、平行研究者驱动的方案。患有 DME 的患者被随机分配到玻璃体内注射抗 VEGF 药物单药治疗组(n=25)或玻璃体内注射抗 VEGF 药物+阈下激光联合治疗组(n=26)。主要观察指标是第 96 周最终评估时玻璃体内注射抗 VEGF 药物的次数,以及最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心视网膜厚度(CRT)的变化。单药治疗组玻璃体内注射抗 VEGF 药物的平均次数为 5.86±2.43,联合治疗组为 6.05±2.73,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.83)。在整个随访期间,两组 CRT(P=0.17)和 BCVA(P=0.31)的平均变化差异也无统计学意义。我们的结论是,阈下激光联合抗 VEGF 治疗并不能减少所需的玻璃体内注射次数。