El-Hage Charles, Hartley Carol, Savage Catherine, Watson James, Gilkerson James, Paillot Romain
Centre for Equine Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, CSIRO, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 26;10(6):855. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060855.
During Australia's first and only outbreak of equine influenza (EI), which was restricted to two northeastern states, horses were strategically vaccinated with a recombinant canarypox-vectored vaccine (rCP-EIV; ProteqFlu™, Merial P/L). The vaccine encoded for haemagglutinin (HA) belonging to two equine influenza viruses (EIVs), including an American and Eurasian lineage subtype that predated the EIV responsible for the outbreak (A/equine/Sydney/07). Racehorses in Victoria (a southern state that remained free of EI) were vaccinated prophylactically. Although the vaccine encoded for (HA) belonged to two EIVs of distinct strains of the field virus, clinical protection was reported in vaccinated horses. Our aim is to assess the extent of humoral immunity in one group of vaccinated horses and interferon-gamma ((EIV)-IFN-γ)) production in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of a second population of vaccinated horses. Twelve racehorses at work were monitored for haemagglutination inhibition antibodies to three antigenically distinct equine influenza viruses (EIVs) The EIV antigens included two H3N8 subtypes: A/equine/Sydney/07) A/equine/Newmarket/95 (a European lineage strain) and an H7N7 subtype (A/equine/Prague1956). Cell-mediated immune responses of: seven racehorses following an accelerated vaccination schedule, two horses vaccinated using a conventional regimen, and six unvaccinated horses were evaluated by determining (EIV)-IFN-γ levels. Antibody responses following vaccination with ProteqFlu™ were cross-reactive in nature, with responses to both H3N8 EIV strains. Although (EIV)IFN-γ was clearly detected following the in vitro re-stimulation of PBMC, there was no significant difference between the different groups of horses. Results of this study support reports of clinical protection of Australian horses following vaccination with Proteq-Flu™ with objective evidence of humoral cross-reactivity to the outbreak viral strain A/equine/Sydney/07.
在澳大利亚首次也是唯一一次马流感(EI)疫情期间,疫情仅局限于两个东北部州,马匹被战略性地接种了重组金丝雀痘病毒载体疫苗(rCP-EIV;ProteqFlu™,梅里亚有限公司)。该疫苗编码了两种马流感病毒(EIV)的血凝素(HA),包括一种美国谱系亚型和一种欧亚谱系亚型,这两种亚型早于引发此次疫情的EIV(A/equine/Sydney/07)。维多利亚州(一个未受EI影响的南部州)的赛马接受了预防性接种。尽管该疫苗编码的(HA)属于两种与野外病毒不同毒株的EIV,但据报道接种疫苗的马匹获得了临床保护。我们的目的是评估一组接种疫苗马匹的体液免疫程度,以及另一组接种疫苗马匹外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中干扰素-γ((EIV)-IFN-γ)的产生情况。对12匹正在工作的赛马监测了针对三种抗原性不同的马流感病毒(EIV)的血凝抑制抗体。EIV抗原包括两种H3N8亚型:A/equine/Sydney/07、A/equine/Newmarket/95(一种欧洲谱系毒株)和一种H7N7亚型(A/equine/Prague1956)。通过测定(EIV)-IFN-γ水平,评估了7匹按加速接种程序接种疫苗的赛马、2匹按常规方案接种疫苗的赛马以及6匹未接种疫苗的赛马的细胞介导免疫反应。接种ProteqFlu™后的抗体反应本质上具有交叉反应性,对两种H3N8 EIV毒株均有反应。尽管在体外重新刺激PBMC后明显检测到了(EIV)IFN-γ,但不同组的马匹之间没有显著差异。本研究结果支持了关于澳大利亚马匹接种Proteq-Flu™后获得临床保护的报道,并提供了针对疫情病毒株A/equine/Sydney/07体液交叉反应性的客观证据。