• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亨氏单位和结石异质性变化在预测体外冲击波碎石术结果中的作用。

The usefulness of the Hounsfield unit and stone heterogeneity variation in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Adıyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adıyaman, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Adıyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adıyaman, Turkey.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 May;28(3):187-192. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20945.

DOI:10.5152/dir.2022.20945
PMID:35748199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9634939/
Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the use of stone density variation coefficient (SDVC) as an indicator of stone heterogeneity and previously reported parameters for predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcome in urinary calculi. Moreover, a new formula that could be used to predict ESWL success was suggested. METHODS A total of 850 patients, who underwent the first session of ESWL for urinary stones between 2015 and 2020, were examined, and 220 eligible patients were included in the study. Stone density variation coefficient and other parameters associated with stone attenuation values and stone size parameters were studied as potential predictors based on noncontrast com- puted tomography (NCCT). Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success was considered after 3 months by radiography or NCCT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors contributing to treatment success. RESULTS For the 220 patients, ESWL success rate was 39.5%. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that SDVC (AUC=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.87; P < .001), mean stone density (AUC=0.81; 95% CI:0.75-0.87; P < .001), maximum stone density (AUC=0.70; 95% CI: 0.63-0.78; P < .001), stone volume (AUC=0.70; 95% CI: 0.62-0.77; P < .001), and major diam- eter (AUC=0.67; 95% CI: 0.59-0.74; P < .001) had significant prediction accuracy from high to low. Additionally, SDVC was found to be successful in predicting ESWL success, especially for patients with high mean stone density (OR = 10; 95% CI: 3.55-28.57; P < .001). The logistic regres- sion model, in which the "stone disintegration probability" (SDP) formula was found, correctly predicted ESWL success with a single session by 79.1%. CONCLUSION In conclusion, size and attenuation values were predictors of treatment success, and the best predictor was SDVC. Evaluation of SDP formula prior to ESWL could predict treatment outcomes and facilitate the decisions regarding treatment strategies.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估结石密度变异系数(SDVC)作为结石异质性指标的应用,并评估先前报道的参数在预测体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗尿结石中的作用。此外,提出了一种新的公式,可以用于预测 ESWL 的成功率。

方法 回顾性分析 2015 年至 2020 年间行首次 ESWL 治疗的 850 例尿结石患者资料,根据平扫 CT 值选择 220 例符合条件的患者作为研究对象。研究基于平扫 CT 值,探讨了与结石衰减值和结石大小参数相关的结石密度变异系数和其他参数作为潜在预测因素。术后 3 个月通过影像学检查评价 ESWL 效果。采用 Logistic 回归分析确定影响治疗效果的因素。

结果 220 例患者中,ESWL 成功率为 39.5%。ROC 分析显示,SDVC(AUC=0.82;95%CI:0.76-0.87;P<0.001)、平均结石密度(AUC=0.81;95%CI:0.75-0.87;P<0.001)、最大结石密度(AUC=0.70;95%CI:0.63-0.78;P<0.001)、结石体积(AUC=0.70;95%CI:0.62-0.77;P<0.001)和最大径(AUC=0.67;95%CI:0.59-0.74;P<0.001)的预测准确性由高到低。此外,SDVC 成功预测 ESWL 成功率,特别是对于平均结石密度较高的患者(OR=10;95%CI:3.55-28.57;P<0.001)。该逻辑回归模型发现的“结石粉碎概率”(SDP)公式可以正确预测单次 ESWL 治疗的成功率,达到 79.1%。

结论 综上所述,结石大小和衰减值是治疗效果的预测因素,最佳预测因素是 SDVC。在 ESWL 治疗前评估 SDP 公式可以预测治疗结果,并有助于制定治疗策略。

相似文献

1
The usefulness of the Hounsfield unit and stone heterogeneity variation in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome.亨氏单位和结石异质性变化在预测体外冲击波碎石术结果中的作用。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 May;28(3):187-192. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20945.
2
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
3
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.Hounsfield 单位在预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石结局中的作用:系统评价结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石:CT 纹理分析技术能否帮助预测疗效?
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Noncontrast computed tomography factors predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in patients with pancreatic duct stones.预测胰腺管结石患者体外冲击波碎石术结果的非对比计算机断层扫描因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Dec;43(12):3367-3373. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1639-4.
6
Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.预测冲击波碎石术后肾结石结局的非增强计算机断层扫描因素。
Clin Imaging. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
7
Can we successfully predict the outcome for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for medium size renal stones? A single-center experience.我们能否成功预测体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗中等大小肾结石的结果?单中心经验。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):235-239. doi: 10.1177/03915603211016355. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.通过容积三维计算机断层扫描测量结石以预测体外冲击波碎石术后的结果。
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):524-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08069.x. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
9
Role of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Stones Cases: A Meta-analysis.非增强计算机断层扫描参数在预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石病例结局中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(8):3282-3296. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
10
Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?腹部平片上的结石密度能否预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果?
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jan;56(1):56-62. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.56. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Measure of Stone Burden is the Best Predictor of Interventional Outcomes in Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the YAU Urolithiasis Working Group and EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel.哪种结石负荷指标是尿石症介入治疗结果的最佳预测指标:由姚氏尿石症工作组和欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症指南小组进行的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Nov 22;71:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success.结石密度和肾皮质厚度的变异系数:评估非增强 CT 成像预测体外冲击波碎石术成功的参数。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01561-8.
3
Comparison of ureteral stone measurements for predicting the efficacy of a single session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: one-, two-, and three-dimensional computed tomography measurements.比较单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测:一维、二维和三维 CT 测量。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Mar 5;52(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01538-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.最大亨氏单位(HU)在预测输尿管结石碎石术结果中的有用性,以及使用最大 HU 提出新的指标。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Feb;48(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01123-3. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
2
Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines.尿路结石的外科治疗——现有指南的系统分析
BMC Urol. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0332-9.
3
Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.结石密度变异系数:体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的一种新型预测指标。
J Endourol. 2017 Apr;31(4):384-390. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0719. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
4
Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.结石异质性指数作为亨氏单位的标准差:输尿管结石冲击波碎石术结果的一种新型预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 1;6:23988. doi: 10.1038/srep23988.
5
CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E837-51. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3483. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
Guideline of guidelines: kidney stones.指南的指南:肾结石
BJU Int. 2015 Aug;116(2):184-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13080. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
7
Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.评估亨氏单位作为体外冲击波碎石术结果和结石成分的预测因素。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0712-x. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
8
Stone attenuation value and cross-sectional area on computed tomography predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy.计算机断层扫描上的结石衰减值和横截面积可预测冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Korean J Urol. 2013 Jul;54(7):454-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.7.454. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
9
Shockwave lithotripsy-new concepts and optimizing treatment parameters.冲击波碎石术——新概念和优化治疗参数。
Urol Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;40(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
10
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.