CEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; LABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
CEB - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; LABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
Biotechnol Adv. 2022 Nov;60:108013. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108013. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Microbial biosurfactants have attracted the attention of researchers and companies for the last decades, as they are considered promising candidates to replace chemical surfactants in numerous applications. Although in the last years, considerable advances were performed regarding strain engineering and the use of low-cost substrates in order to reduce their production costs, one of the main bottlenecks is their production at industrial scale. Conventional aerobic biosurfactant production processes result in excessive foaming, due to the use of high agitation and aeration rates necessary to increase dissolved oxygen concentration to allow microbial growth and biosurfactant production. Different approaches have been studied to overcome this problem, although with limited success. A not widely explored alternative is the development of foam-free processes through the anaerobic growth of biosurfactant-producing microorganisms. Surfactin, produced by Bacillus subtilis, is the most widely studied lipopeptide biosurfactant, and the most powerful biosurfactant known so far. Bacillus licheniformis strains produce lichenysin, a lipopeptide biosurfactant which structure is similar to surfactin. However, despite its extraordinary surface-active properties and potential applications, lichenysin has been scarcely studied. According to previous studies, B. licheniformis is better adapted to anaerobic growth than B. subtilis, and could be a good alternative for the anaerobic production of lipopeptide biosurfactants. In this review, the potential and limitations of surfactin and lichenysin production under anaerobic conditions will be analyzed, and the possibility of implementing foam-free processes for lichenysin production, in order to expand the market and applications of biosurfactants in different fields, will be discussed.
微生物生物表面活性剂在过去几十年中引起了研究人员和公司的关注,因为它们被认为是在许多应用中替代化学表面活性剂的有前途的候选物。尽管近年来在菌株工程和使用低成本底物方面取得了相当大的进展,以降低生产成本,但主要瓶颈之一是在工业规模上进行生产。传统的好氧生物表面活性剂生产工艺会由于使用高搅拌和通气率导致过度起泡,这是为了增加溶解氧浓度以允许微生物生长和生物表面活性剂生产所必需的。已经研究了不同的方法来克服这个问题,但成功有限。一种尚未广泛探索的替代方法是通过厌氧生长生物表面活性剂产生微生物来开发无泡工艺。表面活性剂是枯草芽孢杆菌产生的,是研究最多的脂肽生物表面活性剂,也是迄今为止已知的最有效的生物表面活性剂。地衣芽孢杆菌产生的地衣素是一种脂肽生物表面活性剂,其结构与表面活性剂相似。然而,尽管它具有非凡的表面活性特性和潜在的应用,但对地衣素的研究甚少。根据先前的研究,地衣芽孢杆菌比枯草芽孢杆菌更适应厌氧生长,因此可能是厌氧生产脂肽生物表面活性剂的良好替代品。在这篇综述中,将分析在厌氧条件下生产表面活性剂和地衣素的潜力和局限性,并讨论为了扩大生物表面活性剂在不同领域的市场和应用,实现无泡工艺生产地衣素的可能性。