文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

测试非正式护理模式:COVID-19大流行首次封锁期间护理提供强度的人际变化。

Testing the informal care model: intrapersonal change in care provision intensity during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Raiber Klara, Verbakel Ellen, de Boer Alice

机构信息

Radboud University in Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2022 Jun 22;19(4):1287-1300. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00713-2. eCollection 2022 Dec.


DOI:10.1007/s10433-022-00713-2
PMID:35754702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9213212/
Abstract

Informal care, meaning taking health-related care of people in their own social network, is a topic that gets more and more attention in social science research because the pressure on people to provide informal care is rising due to ageing societies and policy changes. The developed by Broese van Groenou and de Boer (Eur J Ageing 13(3):271-279, 2016) provides a theoretical foundation to understand under what conditions a person provides informal care. We test this theoretical model by applying it to intrapersonal changes in informal care provision during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands in Spring 2020. Data from the LISS panel from two time points, March 2020 and data from July over the period of April/May 2020, were analysed with multinominal multilevel regression analysis ( = 1270 care situations of 1014 caregivers). Our results showed that the individual determinants ( and especially ) discussed in the Informal Care Model (apart from a series of control variables) are contributing substantially to the understanding of intrapersonal changes in care provision during the first lockdown and by that, we found empirical support for the theoretical model. We conclude that on top of its original purpose to explain between-individual differences in informal caregiving using static indicators, the is also useful to explain intrapersonal changes in informal caregiving using dynamic indicators.

摘要

非正式照料,即对自身社交网络中的人们提供与健康相关的照料,是社会科学研究中越来越受关注的一个话题,因为老龄化社会和政策变化使得人们提供非正式照料的压力不断上升。Broese van Groenou和de Boer(《欧洲老龄化杂志》,13(3):271 - 279,2016年)提出的[相关理论或模型名称未给出,暂用“ ”指代]为理解一个人在何种条件下提供非正式照料提供了理论基础。我们通过将其应用于2020年春季荷兰首次新冠疫情封锁期间非正式照料提供的个体内部变化来检验这一理论模型。对LISS面板在两个时间点的数据进行了分析,即2020年3月以及2020年4月/5月期间7月的数据,采用多项多水平回归分析(涉及1014名照料者的1270种照料情况)。我们的结果表明,非正式照料模型中讨论的个体决定因素(尤其是[此处具体因素未给出,暂用“ ”指代])(除一系列控制变量外)在很大程度上有助于理解首次封锁期间照料提供的个体内部变化,由此,我们为该理论模型找到了实证支持。我们得出结论,除了其最初使用静态指标解释非正式照料个体间差异的目的外,[相关理论或模型名称未给出,暂用“ ”指代]对于使用动态指标解释非正式照料的个体内部变化也很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/1a551747b369/10433_2022_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/a019265b0580/10433_2022_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/58465bcd20c3/10433_2022_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/1a551747b369/10433_2022_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/a019265b0580/10433_2022_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/58465bcd20c3/10433_2022_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/1a551747b369/10433_2022_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Testing the informal care model: intrapersonal change in care provision intensity during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Eur J Ageing. 2022-6-22

[2]
Are the gender gaps in informal caregiving intensity and burden closing due to the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from the Netherlands.

Gend Work Organ. 2021-9

[3]
Informal caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a representative, population-based study during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany.

Aging Ment Health. 2022-10

[4]
Exploring lived experiences of informal caregivers for pregnant women seeking scheduled antenatal care during the COVID-19 lockdown in China: A phenomenological study.

Midwifery. 2022-6

[5]
Providing informal care in a changing society.

Eur J Ageing. 2016

[6]
Informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic perceive additional burden: findings from an ad-hoc survey in Germany.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021-4-16

[7]
Gender Differences in Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Caregiver Burden among Informal Caregivers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Representative, Population-Based Study.

Gerontology. 2023

[8]
Caregiving Situation as a Predictor of Subjective Caregiver Burden: Informal Caregivers of Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-11-4

[9]
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-1-4

[10]
Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.

Eur J Ageing. 2021-12-14

引用本文的文献

[1]
The impact of informal care provision on the quality of life of adults caring for persons with mental health problems: A cross-sectional assessment of caregiver quality of life.

Health Psychol Open. 2024-8-6

[2]
Support for Older Parents in Need in Europe: The Role of the Social Network and of Individual and Relational Characteristics.

Innov Aging. 2023-4-17

[3]
Family care during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: longitudinal evidence on consequences for the well-being of caregivers.

Eur J Ageing. 2023-5-11

本文引用的文献

[1]
Informal care in times of a public health crisis: Objective burden, subjective burden and quality of life of caregivers in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Health Soc Care Community. 2022-11

[2]
Are the gender gaps in informal caregiving intensity and burden closing due to the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from the Netherlands.

Gend Work Organ. 2021-9

[3]
The Impact of COVID-19 on Informal Caregiving and Care Receiving Across Europe During the First Phase of the Pandemic.

Front Public Health. 2021

[4]
A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021-3-23

[5]
Willingness and preparedness to provide care: interviews with individuals of different ages and with different caregiving experiences.

BMC Geriatr. 2021-3-25

[6]
Care in times of COVID-19: the impact of the pandemic on informal caregiving in Austria.

Eur J Ageing. 2021-3-12

[7]
Determinants of informal care-giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands.

Health Soc Care Community. 2021-11

[8]
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown.

PLoS One. 2020-11-30

[9]
From "" to ": The Varied Experiences of Australian Families During COVID-19.

Front Psychol. 2020-10-20

[10]
A UK survey of COVID-19 related social support closures and their effects on older people, people with dementia, and carers.

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索