• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试非正式护理模式:COVID-19大流行首次封锁期间护理提供强度的人际变化。

Testing the informal care model: intrapersonal change in care provision intensity during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Raiber Klara, Verbakel Ellen, de Boer Alice

机构信息

Radboud University in Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2022 Jun 22;19(4):1287-1300. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00713-2. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s10433-022-00713-2
PMID:35754702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9213212/
Abstract

Informal care, meaning taking health-related care of people in their own social network, is a topic that gets more and more attention in social science research because the pressure on people to provide informal care is rising due to ageing societies and policy changes. The developed by Broese van Groenou and de Boer (Eur J Ageing 13(3):271-279, 2016) provides a theoretical foundation to understand under what conditions a person provides informal care. We test this theoretical model by applying it to intrapersonal changes in informal care provision during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands in Spring 2020. Data from the LISS panel from two time points, March 2020 and data from July over the period of April/May 2020, were analysed with multinominal multilevel regression analysis ( = 1270 care situations of 1014 caregivers). Our results showed that the individual determinants ( and especially ) discussed in the Informal Care Model (apart from a series of control variables) are contributing substantially to the understanding of intrapersonal changes in care provision during the first lockdown and by that, we found empirical support for the theoretical model. We conclude that on top of its original purpose to explain between-individual differences in informal caregiving using static indicators, the is also useful to explain intrapersonal changes in informal caregiving using dynamic indicators.

摘要

非正式照料,即对自身社交网络中的人们提供与健康相关的照料,是社会科学研究中越来越受关注的一个话题,因为老龄化社会和政策变化使得人们提供非正式照料的压力不断上升。Broese van Groenou和de Boer(《欧洲老龄化杂志》,13(3):271 - 279,2016年)提出的[相关理论或模型名称未给出,暂用“ ”指代]为理解一个人在何种条件下提供非正式照料提供了理论基础。我们通过将其应用于2020年春季荷兰首次新冠疫情封锁期间非正式照料提供的个体内部变化来检验这一理论模型。对LISS面板在两个时间点的数据进行了分析,即2020年3月以及2020年4月/5月期间7月的数据,采用多项多水平回归分析(涉及1014名照料者的1270种照料情况)。我们的结果表明,非正式照料模型中讨论的个体决定因素(尤其是[此处具体因素未给出,暂用“ ”指代])(除一系列控制变量外)在很大程度上有助于理解首次封锁期间照料提供的个体内部变化,由此,我们为该理论模型找到了实证支持。我们得出结论,除了其最初使用静态指标解释非正式照料个体间差异的目的外,[相关理论或模型名称未给出,暂用“ ”指代]对于使用动态指标解释非正式照料的个体内部变化也很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/1a551747b369/10433_2022_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/a019265b0580/10433_2022_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/58465bcd20c3/10433_2022_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/1a551747b369/10433_2022_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/a019265b0580/10433_2022_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/58465bcd20c3/10433_2022_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1b/9729508/1a551747b369/10433_2022_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing the informal care model: intrapersonal change in care provision intensity during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic.测试非正式护理模式:COVID-19大流行首次封锁期间护理提供强度的人际变化。
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Jun 22;19(4):1287-1300. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00713-2. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Are the gender gaps in informal caregiving intensity and burden closing due to the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from the Netherlands.由于新冠疫情,非正式照料强度和负担方面的性别差距正在缩小吗?来自荷兰的证据。
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Sep;28(5):1926-1936. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12725. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Informal caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a representative, population-based study during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany.COVID-19 大流行期间的非正式护理:德国大流行第二波期间一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究结果。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Oct;26(10):2062-2070. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1989377. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
4
Exploring lived experiences of informal caregivers for pregnant women seeking scheduled antenatal care during the COVID-19 lockdown in China: A phenomenological study.探索中国 COVID-19 封锁期间寻求定期产前护理的孕妇的非正式照顾者的生活体验:一项现象学研究。
Midwifery. 2022 Jun;109:103316. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103316. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
5
Providing informal care in a changing society.在不断变化的社会中提供非正式护理。
Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(3):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0370-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
6
Informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic perceive additional burden: findings from an ad-hoc survey in Germany.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非正式护理人员感受到了额外的负担:来自德国一项特别调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06359-7.
7
Gender Differences in Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Caregiver Burden among Informal Caregivers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Representative, Population-Based Study.德国第二波 COVID-19 大流行期间非正式照护者的心理健康、生活质量和照护者负担的性别差异:一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究。
Gerontology. 2023;69(2):149-162. doi: 10.1159/000523846. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
8
Caregiving Situation as a Predictor of Subjective Caregiver Burden: Informal Caregivers of Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic.作为主观照顾负担预测因素的照顾情况:COVID-19 大流行期间老年患者的非正式照顾者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114496.
9
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
10
Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.欧洲非正式照料中的社会经济差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Dec 14;19(3):621-632. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00666-y. eCollection 2022 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of informal care provision on the quality of life of adults caring for persons with mental health problems: A cross-sectional assessment of caregiver quality of life.非正式护理服务对照顾有心理健康问题者的成年人生活质量的影响:照顾者生活质量的横断面评估
Health Psychol Open. 2024 Aug 6;11:20551029241262883. doi: 10.1177/20551029241262883. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Support for Older Parents in Need in Europe: The Role of the Social Network and of Individual and Relational Characteristics.欧洲对有需要的老年父母的支持:社会网络以及个人与关系特征的作用。
Innov Aging. 2023 Apr 17;7(4):igad032. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad032. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Informal care in times of a public health crisis: Objective burden, subjective burden and quality of life of caregivers in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic.突发公共卫生危机时期的非正式照护:新冠疫情期间荷兰照护者的客观负担、主观负担和生活质量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5515-e5526. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13975. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Are the gender gaps in informal caregiving intensity and burden closing due to the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from the Netherlands.由于新冠疫情,非正式照料强度和负担方面的性别差距正在缩小吗?来自荷兰的证据。
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Sep;28(5):1926-1936. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12725. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Family care during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: longitudinal evidence on consequences for the well-being of caregivers.
德国首次新冠疫情封锁期间的家庭护理:关于对护理人员幸福感影响的纵向证据。
Eur J Ageing. 2023 May 11;20(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00761-2.
The Impact of COVID-19 on Informal Caregiving and Care Receiving Across Europe During the First Phase of the Pandemic.
新冠疫情对欧洲在大流行第一阶段中非正式照护和照护接受的影响。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;9:673874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673874. eCollection 2021.
4
A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19.多国视角下的 COVID-19 期间时间利用的性别差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 23;118(12). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018494118.
5
Willingness and preparedness to provide care: interviews with individuals of different ages and with different caregiving experiences.提供护理的意愿和准备:对不同年龄和有不同护理经验的个体进行的访谈。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02149-2.
6
Care in times of COVID-19: the impact of the pandemic on informal caregiving in Austria.新冠疫情期间的照料:疫情对奥地利非正式照料的影响。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Mar 12;18(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00611-z. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Determinants of informal care-giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands.荷兰不同社会关系中非正式护理的决定因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1779-1788. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13286. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown.“智能”封锁,智能影响?荷兰新冠封锁期间,针对带薪工作中的性别(不平等)、儿童保育和家务分工以及父母生活质量的一项调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249. eCollection 2020.
9
From "" to ": The Varied Experiences of Australian Families During COVID-19.从“ ”到“ ”:新冠疫情期间澳大利亚家庭的多样经历
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 20;11:588667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588667. eCollection 2020.
10
A UK survey of COVID-19 related social support closures and their effects on older people, people with dementia, and carers.英国一项关于与 COVID-19 相关的社会支持关闭及其对老年人、痴呆症患者和护理人员影响的调查。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;36(3):393-402. doi: 10.1002/gps.5434. Epub 2020 Sep 25.