• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多国视角下的 COVID-19 期间时间利用的性别差异。

A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Organizational Behavior, London Business School, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom.

Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163;

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 23;118(12). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018494118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2018494118
PMID:33798094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7999869/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered how people spend time, with possible consequences for subjective well-being. Using diverse samples from the United States, Canada, Denmark, Brazil, and Spain ( = 31,141), following a preregistered analytic plan, and employing both mega- and meta-analyses, we find consistent gender differences in time spent on necessities. During the pandemic, women-especially mothers-spent more time on tasks such as childcare and household chores. To the extent that women spent more time on chores than men, they reported lower happiness. These data represent one of the most rigorous investigations of gender differences in time use during the forced lockdowns created by the COVID-19 pandemic, and point toward individual differences that should be considered when designing policies now and post-COVID-19.

摘要

新冠疫情从根本上改变了人们的时间分配方式,可能对主观幸福感产生影响。我们采用了来自美国、加拿大、丹麦、巴西和西班牙的多样化样本(=31141),按照预先注册的分析计划,同时进行了 mega 和元分析,发现人们在必需品上所花费的时间存在性别差异。在疫情期间,女性——尤其是母亲——花更多的时间在照顾孩子和家务等任务上。女性在琐事上花费的时间比男性多,她们的幸福感就越低。这些数据代表了对新冠疫情强制封锁期间性别在时间使用上的差异进行的最严格的调查之一,并指出了在制定现在和疫情后政策时应考虑的个体差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/9b0af319395b/pnas.2018494118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/80f116064eb1/pnas.2018494118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/df19bb99395c/pnas.2018494118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/9b0af319395b/pnas.2018494118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/80f116064eb1/pnas.2018494118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/df19bb99395c/pnas.2018494118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0403/7999869/9b0af319395b/pnas.2018494118fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19.多国视角下的 COVID-19 期间时间利用的性别差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 23;118(12). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018494118.
2
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown.“智能”封锁,智能影响?荷兰新冠封锁期间,针对带薪工作中的性别(不平等)、儿童保育和家务分工以及父母生活质量的一项调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249. eCollection 2020.
3
Who is doing the chores and childcare in dual-earner couples during the COVID-19 era of working from home?在新冠疫情期间居家办公的双职工夫妻中,家务和育儿工作由谁来承担?
Rev Econ Househ. 2023;21(2):519-565. doi: 10.1007/s11150-022-09642-6. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
4
Gender differences in housework and childcare among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间日本劳动者家务劳动和育儿分工的性别差异。
J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12339. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12339.
5
Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown.英国新冠疫情封锁期间无薪护理工作与心理困扰方面的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247959. eCollection 2021.
6
Experiences of Work-Family Conflict and Mental Health Symptoms by Gender Among Physician Parents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间医生父母中按性别划分的工作-家庭冲突经历及心理健康症状
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134315. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34315.
7
Has COVID-19 had a greater impact on female than male oncologists? Results of the ESMO Women for Oncology (W4O) Survey.COVID-19 对女性肿瘤学家的影响是否大于男性?ESMO 女性肿瘤学(W4O)调查结果。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100131. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100131. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
Work-Life Balance and Teleworking: Lessons Learned during the Pandemic on Gender Role Transformation and Self-Reported Well-Being.工作生活平衡和远程办公:大流行期间关于性别角色转变和自我报告幸福感的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148468.
9
Gender Inequality and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.性别不平等与新冠大流行期间的心理健康
Int J Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;66:1604220. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604220. eCollection 2021.
10
The effects of employment status and daily stressors on time spent on daily household chores in middle-aged and older adults.就业状况和日常压力源对中年及以上成年人每日家务时间的影响。
Gerontologist. 2013 Feb;53(1):81-91. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns047. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric validity of the Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale.感知家庭管理困扰量表的心理测量效度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18069-9.
2
Taking on the Invisible Third Shift: The Unequal Division of Cognitive Labor and Women's Work Outcomes.承担无形的第三班工作:认知劳动的不平等分配与女性的工作成果。
Psychol Women Q. 2025 Jun;49(2):205-219. doi: 10.1177/03616843251330284. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Decomposition and comparative analysis of differences in anxiety between urban and rural Chinese adults: a national cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Alleviating time poverty among the working poor: a pre-registered longitudinal field experiment.缓解工作贫困人群的时间贫困:一项预先注册的纵向实地实验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):719. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04352-y.
2
Women's and men's work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19.新冠疫情之前及期间的女性和男性工作、家务劳动与儿童照料
Rev Econ Househ. 2020;18(4):1001-1017. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09502-1. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
3
COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.
中国城乡成年人焦虑差异的分解与比较分析:一项全国性横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21794-5.
4
Gender inequalities in the disruption of long-term life satisfaction trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of time use: evidence from a prospective cohort study.新冠疫情期间长期生活满意度轨迹中断中的性别不平等以及时间利用的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究的证据
BJPsych Open. 2024 Dec 4;10(6):e217. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.817.
5
Brazilian children's quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of contextual factors and dimensions.巴西儿童在 COVID-19 大流行期间的生活质量:背景因素和维度分析。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2024 Sep 23;43:e2023175. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2023175. eCollection 2024.
6
Caring is not always sharing: A scoping review exploring how COVID-19 containment measures have impacted unpaid care work and mental health among women and men in Europe.关爱不总是分享:一项探索 COVID-19 遏制措施如何影响欧洲男性和女性的无酬护理工作和心理健康的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 30;19(8):e0308381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308381. eCollection 2024.
7
Musculoskeletal disorders and quality of life for Chilean teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic at the academic year-end.肌肉骨骼疾病与生活质量:智利教师在 COVID-19 大流行期间学年末的状况。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 6;12:1277578. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1277578. eCollection 2024.
8
When the antidote is the poison: Investigating the relationship between people's social media usage and loneliness when face-to-face communication is restricted.当解药成为毒药:探究在面对面交流受到限制时,人们使用社交媒体与孤独感之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 9;19(2):e0296423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296423. eCollection 2024.
9
Experience of irreproducibility as a risk factor for poor mental health in biomedical science doctoral students: A survey and interview-based study.不可重复性体验作为生物医学科学博士生心理健康不良的风险因素:一项基于调查和访谈的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0293584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293584. eCollection 2023.
10
Parenting, Gender, and Perception of Changes in Children's Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic.育儿方式、性别与新冠疫情期间儿童行为变化的感知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;20(15):6452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156452.
新型冠状病毒肺炎与工作场所:对未来研究和行动的影响、问题和启示。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):63-77. doi: 10.1037/amp0000716. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations.为什么时间贫困对个人、组织和国家都很重要。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0920-z. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
6
Valuing time over money predicts happiness after a major life transition: A preregistered longitudinal study of graduating students.重视时间甚于金钱可预测重大生活转变后的幸福感:对毕业学生的一项预先注册的纵向研究。
Sci Adv. 2019 Sep 18;5(9):eaax2615. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax2615. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Happiness is Greater in More Scenic Locations.风景优美的地方会让人更快乐。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40854-6.
8
An Empirical Comparison of Meta- and Mega-Analysis With Data From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group.基于ENIGMA强迫症工作组数据的元分析与大分析的实证比较
Front Neuroinform. 2019 Jan 8;12:102. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00102. eCollection 2018.
9
It's time for happiness.是时候幸福了。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Apr;26:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
10
Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis.简介、比较和验证 Meta-Essentials:一个免费且简单的元分析工具。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):537-553. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1260. Epub 2017 Sep 29.