• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术出版的影响:行为分析期刊中女性面临的不平等

The Impact of Academic Publication: Inequity for Women in Behavior Analytic Journals.

作者信息

Krebsbach Jennifer M

机构信息

Education Department, California State University Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2022 Jun 9;7:782914. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.782914. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2022.782914
PMID:35755484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9218055/
Abstract

The number of women in higher education has increased over the past few decades but are still not at an equal level to their male counterparts, especially at the tenured level. One area of note within the tenure process is research. This area is highly valued by certain universities and could shed light on discrepancies in the number of female faculty as the faculty position becomes more prestigious. The author downloaded 21 years of publication data for seven prestigious behavior analytic journals and used quantitative methods to determine if the rates of publication differed between a previous study and today. There were 8,778 final articles yielding 27,225 authors in total. Data showed that women are represented more frequently overall, across time and all journals, less frequently in prestigious authorship positions, and more often when the sex of the editor at the time of publication was also female. While women's participation has increased over time, and since the original study, there is still disproportionate representation compared to the entirety of the field, in the order of authorship positions, and for editor-in-chief positions.

摘要

在过去几十年里,接受高等教育的女性人数有所增加,但仍未与男性达到平等水平,尤其是在终身教职层面。终身教职评定过程中一个值得注意的方面是研究。某些大学高度重视这一领域,随着教职地位变得更具声望,这一领域可能会揭示女性教员数量上的差异。作者下载了7种著名行为分析期刊21年的出版数据,并使用定量方法来确定当前与之前一项研究相比,出版率是否有所不同。最终有8778篇文章,总计27225位作者。数据显示,总体而言,在所有时间和所有期刊中,女性作者出现的频率更高;在享有声望的作者排名中,女性出现的频率较低;而当发表文章时的编辑为女性时,女性作者出现的频率更高。虽然随着时间推移以及自最初的研究以来,女性的参与度有所提高,但与整个领域相比,在作者排名顺序以及主编职位方面,女性的代表性仍然不均衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/2a40e569ccfe/fsoc-07-782914-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/a6d45b523489/fsoc-07-782914-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/3442ccdba3a9/fsoc-07-782914-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/1da3b718876a/fsoc-07-782914-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/2a40e569ccfe/fsoc-07-782914-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/a6d45b523489/fsoc-07-782914-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/3442ccdba3a9/fsoc-07-782914-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/1da3b718876a/fsoc-07-782914-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c956/9218055/2a40e569ccfe/fsoc-07-782914-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Academic Publication: Inequity for Women in Behavior Analytic Journals.学术出版的影响:行为分析期刊中女性面临的不平等
Front Sociol. 2022 Jun 9;7:782914. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.782914. eCollection 2022.
2
Association between women's authorship and women's editorship in infectious diseases journals: a cross-sectional study.女性作者与女性编辑在传染病学期刊中的关联:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;22(10):1455-1464. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00367-X. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
A study of the number of female editors-in-chief of dermatology journals.一项关于皮肤科期刊女性主编人数的研究。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Jun 3;3(4):185-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.03.001. eCollection 2017 Dec.
4
Women's representation in emergency medicine journals across two decades: 2000-2019.二十年间(2000 - 2019年)女性在急诊医学期刊中的代表性情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:501-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Gender Trends in Authorship in Psychiatry Journals From 2008 to 2018.2008 年至 2018 年精神病学期刊作者性别趋势。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 15;86(8):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
6
Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective.脊柱相关学术文献著者的性别趋势——39 年的视角。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Are Women Disadvantaged in Academic Radiology?女性在放射科学术界是否处于劣势?
Acad Radiol. 2020 Dec;27(12):1760-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Gender Concordance of First and Senior Authors in Family Medicine Journals.家庭医学期刊中第一作者和资深作者的性别一致性。
Fam Med. 2021 Feb;53(2):92-97. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2021.355251.
9
Analysis of authorship trends in vascular surgery demonstrates a sticky surgical floor for women.血管外科领域作者身份趋势分析表明,女性在该外科领域的晋升存在障碍。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.228. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
Women's role in neurosurgical research: is the gender gap improving?女性在神经外科学研究中的角色:性别差距是否在改善?
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E6. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20911.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender differences in research fields of bioeconomy and rural development-based on sustainable systems in Latin America and Africa regions.生物经济和农村发展研究领域中的性别差异——基于拉丁美洲和非洲地区的可持续系统。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0308713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308713. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services.姓名到性别的推理服务的比较与基准测试
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Jul 16;4:e156. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.156. eCollection 2018.
2
Gender gap in research: a bibliometric study of published articles in primary health care and general internal medicine.性别差距在研究中:初级卫生保健和普通内科发表文章的文献计量研究。
Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 23;37(3):325-331. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz091.
3
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future.
学术晋升和终身教职评定过程中学术成果的评估:过去、现在与未来。
F1000Res. 2018 Oct 5;7:1605. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16493.1. eCollection 2018.
4
Participation of Women in Behavior Analysis Research: Some Recent and Relevant Data.女性参与行为分析研究:一些近期的相关数据。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Feb 7;11(2):160-164. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-0211-6. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.《自然指数》期刊所揭示的高质量研究中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136. eCollection 2018.
6
The peer review gap: A longitudinal case study of gendered publishing and occupational patterns in a female-rich discipline, Western North America (1974-2016).同行评审差距:北美西部一个女性占主导的学科中性别化出版与职业模式的纵向案例研究(1974 - 2016年)
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 29;12(11):e0188403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188403. eCollection 2017.
7
Gender bias in scholarly peer review.学术同行评审中的性别偏见。
Elife. 2017 Mar 21;6:e21718. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21718.
8
Prominent Women in Behavior Analysis: An Introduction.行为分析领域的杰出女性:引言
Behav Anal. 2015 Jul 25;38(2):225-7. doi: 10.1007/s40614-015-0032-7. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
Participation by women in developmental, social, cognitive, and general psychology: A context for interpreting trends in behavior analysis.女性在发展心理学、社会心理学、认知心理学和普通心理学中的参与:行为分析趋势解读的背景。
Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;25(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03392043.
10
The glass ceiling is not fragile: A response to Odum (2000).玻璃天花板并非不堪一击:对奥杜姆(2000年)的回应。
Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;24(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03392021.