Death Pronouncement: Preparing Incoming Residents for Duties When Life Ends.

Introduction Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) prepares future residents for many aspects of medical practice, but it is rarely all-inclusive. Death pronouncement (DP), a highly important aspect of clinical training for residents, seems to be inadequately addressed and taught in undergraduate institutions. Studies have indicated that most first-year residents received minimal DP training and felt unprepared for this duty. Despite being a challenging situation, a formal teaching course is not universally taught, with most institutions merely delivering point-of-care DP instruction to medical trainees provided by supervising faculty, senior residents, and nurses. Our primary objective was to provide formal education in Duties When Life Ends (DWLE), with the goal of enhancing familiarity, knowledge, and confidence in addressing the circumstances surrounding death for graduating medical students transitioning to residency. Methods As a part of a Transition to Residency (TTR) course for students entering nonsurgical specialties, we developed a curriculum to provide formal education to fourth-year medical students in DWLE that included a two-hour didactic session delivered virtually, followed by an in-person simulation session. The didactic session covered the history, processes of DP, death physical examination, identification of medical examiner (ME) case, education on how to deliver death news to family, information about autopsies and organ donation, distinction between the cause and mechanism of death, and documentation of death notes and certificates, as well as provider self-reflection and appropriate coping mechanisms for patient death. In the 45-minute simulation, students were divided into small groups and given a case summary. During the first half, they performed a physical examination and a verbal pronouncement on cadavers, followed by an interactive small group session where students reviewed the case and worked to identify the cause of death, determine if the death was a medical examiner's case, deliver death news to the family, and complete a death progress note and certificate. Pre- and post-session questionnaires were administered, assessing three components: process familiarity, knowledge, and confidence. Finally, participants assessed course usefulness and had a free response opportunity for comments and feedback.  Results Overall, 198 students participated in all sessions, with 182 completing both pre- and post-session questionnaires. Pre-survey revealed that 70% of participants reported witnessing DP previously, with only 20% being familiar with the process of DP and 6% with documentation. Following the intervention, a comparison of the pre- and post-course questionnaires assessing process familiarity, knowledge, and confidence using a five-point Likert scale demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the mean scores in all three domains, with reported course usefulness of 96%. Conclusion A DWLE curriculum, as a part of the TTR course, was effective in improving self-reported familiarity, knowledge, and confidence regarding physician duties associated with patient death. The curriculum was well received by students. The incorporation of DWLE curriculum into TTR courses allows for vital preparation and education in the duties related to patient death. This may make a stressful process somewhat less stressful and may aid future physicians in developing competence in conducting these final physician duties.