Yang Mingpeng, Sun Nan, Luo Yong, Lai Xiaochen, Li Peiru, Zhang Zhenyu
School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Biomicrofluidics. 2022 Jun 21;16(3):031503. doi: 10.1063/5.0088551. eCollection 2022 May.
Bubbles in microfluidics-even those that appear to be negligibly small-are pervasive and responsible for the failure of many biological and chemical experiments. For instance, they block current conduction, damage cell membranes, and interfere with detection results. To overcome this unavoidable and intractable problem, researchers have developed various methods for capturing and removing bubbles from microfluidics. Such methods are multifarious and their working principles are very different from each other. In this review, bubble-removing methods are divided into two broad categories: active debubblers (that require external auxiliary equipment) and passive debubblers (driven by natural processes). In each category, three main types of methods are discussed along with their advantages and disadvantages. Among the active debubblers, those assisted by lasers, acoustic generators, and negative pressure pumps are discussed. Among the passive debubblers, those driven by buoyancy, the characteristics of gas-liquid interfaces, and the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of materials are discussed. Finally, the challenges and prospects of the bubble-removal technologies are reviewed to refer researchers to microfluidics and inspire further investigations in this field.
微流控中的气泡——即使是那些看似微不足道的小气泡——也普遍存在,并导致许多生物和化学实验失败。例如,它们会阻碍电流传导、破坏细胞膜并干扰检测结果。为了克服这个不可避免且棘手的问题,研究人员开发了各种从微流控中捕获和去除气泡的方法。这些方法多种多样,其工作原理也彼此大不相同。在本综述中,气泡去除方法分为两大类:主动除泡器(需要外部辅助设备)和被动除泡器(由自然过程驱动)。在每一类中,讨论了三种主要类型的方法及其优缺点。在主动除泡器中,讨论了由激光、声波发生器和负压泵辅助的除泡器。在被动除泡器中,讨论了由浮力、气液界面特性以及材料的亲水和疏水特性驱动的除泡器。最后,综述了气泡去除技术的挑战和前景,以供研究人员参考微流控并激发该领域的进一步研究。