Morris Olea
Central European University, Quellenstraße 51-55, 1100 Vienna, Austria.
Sustain Sci. 2022;17(4):1235-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01162-7. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
This article highlights the emergence of intentional communities known as ecovillages () in Mexico, exploring how humans seek to design sustainable futures in part by re-making rural livelihoods. Ecovillages are inherently speculative ventures, or as Burke and Arjona (2013) note, laboratories for alternative political ecologies, inviting-and indeed, necessitating-the reimagination of human lives with greater consideration for the natural world. In this sense, such communities might be understood as "exilic spaces" (O'Hearn and Grubačić 2016), in that they seek to build autonomous and self-sustaining agricultural, social, and economic systems while also reflecting a stance of resistance to neoliberal capitalist structures. At the same time, communities may also remain dependent on connections to broader regional or global markets in diverse and interconnected ways. Understanding ecovillages as diverse and emergent "worldings" (de la Cadena and Blaser 2018), I ask how these experimental social ventures reckon with their connections to the very systems they are positioned against. To trace out how communities negotiate this fragile space, this article is concerned with how ecovillagers spend their time at work-particularly when it comes to managing relationships with and between more-than-human beings. Drawing on participant observation with ecovillagers and more-than-human others they work with, I explore how the concept of "" (profitability) is differently constructed. To this end, I highlight ethnographic examples where is purposefully reconceptualized with more-than-human lives in mind; such a shift, I suggest, hinges on ecovillagers' individualized relations with the beings they (imagine themselves) to care for.
本文重点介绍了墨西哥出现的被称为生态村的有意社群,探讨了人类如何通过重塑农村生计来部分地寻求设计可持续的未来。生态村本质上是投机性的事业,或者正如伯克和阿尔霍纳(2013年)所指出的,是另类政治生态的实验室,需要——实际上也必须——以更关注自然世界的方式重新想象人类生活。从这个意义上说,这样的社群可以被理解为“流亡空间”(奥赫恩和格鲁巴契奇,2016年),因为它们试图建立自主和自给自足的农业、社会和经济系统,同时也体现出对新自由主义资本主义结构的抵制立场。与此同时,这些社群可能还以多样且相互关联的方式依赖于与更广泛的区域或全球市场的联系。将生态村理解为多样且正在形成的“世界构建”(德拉卡德纳和布拉泽,2018年),我提出疑问:这些实验性的社会事业如何处理它们与自身所反对的系统之间的联系。为了探寻社群如何在这个脆弱的空间中进行协商,本文关注生态村民在工作中的时间分配方式——尤其是在处理与非人类存在以及它们之间的关系时。基于对生态村民以及与他们一起工作的非人类他者的参与观察,我探讨了“盈利性”这一概念是如何被不同构建的。为此,我着重介绍了一些人种志实例,其中盈利性是在充分考虑非人类生命的情况下被有意重新概念化的;我认为,这种转变取决于生态村民与他们(想象自己)所照料的存在之间的个体化关系。