• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人因 COVID-19 至急诊就诊的严重程度评估评分的制定。

Development of COVID-19 severity assessment score in adults presenting with COVID-19 to the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07535-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-022-07535-8
PMID:35761197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9235277/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically-ill Covid-19 patients require extensive resources which can overburden a healthcare system already under strain due to a pandemic. A good disease severity prediction score can help allocate resources to where they are needed most.

OBJECTIVES

We developed a Covid-19 Severity Assessment Score (CoSAS) to predict those patients likely to suffer from mortalities within 28 days of hospital admission. We also compared this score to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in adults.

METHODS

CoSAS includes the following 10 components: Age, gender, Clinical Frailty Score, number of comorbidities, Ferritin level, D-dimer level, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive Protein levels, systolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Our study was a single center study with data collected via chart review and phone calls. 309 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

CoSAS proved to be a good score to predict Covid-19 mortality with an Area under the Curve (AUC) of 0.78. It also proved better than qSOFA (AUC of 0.70). More studies are needed to externally validate CoSAS.

CONCLUSION

CoSAS is an accurate score to predict Covid-19 mortality in the Pakistani population.

摘要

背景

危重症新冠患者需要大量的资源,这可能会使已经因大流行而不堪重负的医疗系统不堪重负。一个良好的疾病严重程度预测评分可以帮助将资源分配到最需要的地方。

目的

我们开发了一种新冠严重程度评估评分(CoSAS),以预测那些在入院后 28 天内可能死亡的患者。我们还将该评分与成人的快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)进行了比较。

方法

CoSAS 包括以下 10 个组成部分:年龄、性别、临床虚弱评分、合并症数量、铁蛋白水平、D-二聚体水平、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、C 反应蛋白水平、收缩压和血氧饱和度。我们的研究是一项单中心研究,通过病历回顾和电话收集数据。共有 309 名患者纳入研究。

结果

CoSAS 被证明是一种很好的评分,可预测新冠死亡率,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.78。它也优于 qSOFA(AUC 为 0.70)。需要更多的研究来对外验证 CoSAS。

结论

CoSAS 是一种准确的评分,可以预测巴基斯坦人群中新冠的死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b04/9235277/0690924994bd/12879_2022_7535_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b04/9235277/7845863ece77/12879_2022_7535_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b04/9235277/0690924994bd/12879_2022_7535_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b04/9235277/7845863ece77/12879_2022_7535_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b04/9235277/0690924994bd/12879_2022_7535_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of COVID-19 severity assessment score in adults presenting with COVID-19 to the emergency department.成人因 COVID-19 至急诊就诊的严重程度评估评分的制定。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07535-8.
2
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
3
Prediction of mortality in COVID-19 through combing CT severity score with NEWS, qSOFA, or peripheral perfusion index.通过将 CT 严重程度评分与 NEWS、qSOFA 或外周灌注指数相结合预测 COVID-19 患者的死亡率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:546-552. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.079. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
4
Prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among influenza patients in the emergency department.急诊流感患者中 SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对院内死亡率的预后准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 May 29;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05102-7.
5
External Validation of the qSOFA Score in Emergency Department Patients With Pneumonia.急诊科肺炎患者qSOFA评分的外部验证
J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.08.043. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
6
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
7
qSOFA as a new community-acquired pneumonia severity score in the emergency setting.qSOFA 作为一种新的急诊社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Dec;38(12):906-912. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208789. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
Comparing Mortality Prediction by Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with Emergency Physician Judgment.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与急诊医师判断对死亡率预测的比较。
Shock. 2020 Aug;54(2):213-217. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001496.
9
Evaluation of qSOFA combined with inflammatory mediators for diagnosing sepsis and predicting mortality among emergency department.评价 qSOFA 联合炎症介质对急诊科脓毒症的诊断和死亡率预测的价值。
Clin Chim Acta. 2023 Apr 1;544:117352. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117352. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to estimate reduced CYP3A4 activity in cancer patients utilizing the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an inflammatory marker.一种基于生理学的新型药代动力学模型,利用中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率作为炎症标志物来估计癌症患者中细胞色素P450 3A4(CYP3A4)活性降低的情况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;81(6):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03839-1. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
2
Predictors of developing severe COVID-19 among hospitalized patients: a retrospective study.住院患者中发生重症 COVID-19 的预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 14;11:1494302. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1494302. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of the Veterans Health Administration COVID-19 (VACO) Index for predicting short-term mortality among 1307 US academic medical centre inpatients and 427 224 US Medicare patients.退伍军人事务部 COVID-19(VACO)指数预测美国 1307 家学术医疗中心住院患者和 427224 名美国医疗保险患者短期死亡率的准确性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Mar;76(3):254-260. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-216697. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
Male gender is a predictor of higher mortality in hospitalized adults with COVID-19.男性性别是住院 COVID-19 成年患者死亡率更高的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254066. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparative Analysis of qSOFA, PRIEST, PAINT, and ISARIC4C Scores in Predicting Severe COVID-19 Outcomes Among Patients Aged over 75 Years.
qSOFA、PRIEST、PAINT和ISARIC4C评分在预测75岁以上COVID-19患者严重预后中的比较分析
Diseases. 2024 Nov 28;12(12):304. doi: 10.3390/diseases12120304.
4
Vital Signs as Predictors of Oxygen Requirements in COVID-19 Outpatients: The Development of a Streamlined Risk Score.生命体征作为新冠门诊患者氧气需求的预测指标:简化风险评分的制定
Cureus. 2024 May 28;16(5):e61270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61270. eCollection 2024 May.
The COVID-GRAM Tool for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in Europe.
欧洲 COVID-19 住院患者的 COVID-GRAM 工具。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):1000-1001. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0491.
4
Utility of established prognostic scores in COVID-19 hospital admissions: multicentre prospective evaluation of CURB-65, NEWS2 and qSOFA.COVID-19 住院患者中已建立的预后评分的实用性:CURB-65、NEWS2 和 qSOFA 的多中心前瞻性评估。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Dec;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000729.
5
Predictive performance of SOFA and qSOFA for in-hospital mortality in severe novel coronavirus disease.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和简化序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)对严重新型冠状病毒病住院患者死亡率的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;38(10):2074-2080. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
6
A Mechanism for Severity of Disease in Older Patients with COVID-19: The Nexus between Telomere Length and Lymphopenia.新冠病毒肺炎老年患者疾病严重程度的机制:端粒长度与淋巴细胞减少之间的联系。
medRxiv. 2020 Oct 4:2020.10.01.20205393. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.01.20205393.
7
Development and Validation of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index: A Prognostic Tool for Early Clinical Decompensation.快速 COVID-19 严重程度指数的制定与验证:一种用于早期临床失代偿的预后工具。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):442-453. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score.利用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议对因 COVID-19 住院的患者进行风险分层:4C 死亡率评分的制定和验证。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3339.
9
Predictors of COVID-19 severity: A literature review.预测 COVID-19 严重程度的因素:文献综述。
Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jan;31(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2146. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US.与美国 2019 年冠状病毒病危重症患者死亡相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1436-1447. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596.