Robbins Rebecca, Quan Stuart F, Barger Laura K, Czeisler Charles A, Fray-Witzer Maya, Weaver Matthew D, Zhang Ying, Redline Susan, Klerman Elizabeth B
Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sleep Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.sleepe.2021.100016. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Clinical and population health recommendations are derived from studies that include self-report. Differences in question wording and response scales may significantly affect responses. We conducted a methodological review assessing variation in event definition(s), context (i.e., work- versus free-day), and timeframe (e.g., "in the past 4 weeks") of sleep timing/duration questions.
We queried databases of sleep, medicine, epidemiology, and psychology for survey-based studies and/or publications with sleep duration/timing questions. The text of these questions was thematically analyzed.
We identified 53 surveys with sample sizes ranging from 93 to 1,185,106. For sleep duration, participants reported nocturnal sleep (24/44), sleep in the past 24-hours (14/44), their major sleep episode (3/44), or answered unaided (3/44). For bedtime, participants reported time into bed (19/47), first attempt to sleep (16/40), or fall-asleep time (12/47). For wake-time, participants reported wake-up time (30/43), the time they "get up" (7/43), or their out-of-bed time (6/43). Context guidance appeared in 18/44 major sleep duration, 35/47 bedtime, and 34/43 wake-time questions. Timeframe was provided in 8/44 major sleep episode duration, 16/47 bedtime, and 10/43 wake-time questions. One question queried the method of awakening (e.g., by alarm clock), 18 questions assessed sleep latency, and 12 measured napping.
There is variability in the event definition(s), context, and timeframe of questions relating to sleep. This work informs efforts at data harmonization for meta-analyses, provides options for question wording, and identifies questions for future surveys.
临床和人群健康建议源自包含自我报告的研究。问题措辞和回答量表的差异可能会显著影响回答。我们进行了一项方法学综述,评估睡眠时间/时长问题的事件定义、背景(即工作日与休息日)和时间范围(例如,“在过去4周内”)的差异。
我们查询了睡眠、医学、流行病学和心理学数据库,以获取基于调查的研究和/或带有睡眠时长/时间问题的出版物。对这些问题的文本进行了主题分析。
我们确定了53项调查,样本量从93到1,185,106不等。对于睡眠时间,参与者报告夜间睡眠(24/44)、过去24小时内的睡眠(14/44)、主要睡眠时段(3/44)或自行作答(3/44)。对于就寝时间,参与者报告上床时间(19/47)、首次尝试入睡时间(16/40)或入睡时间(12/47)。对于起床时间,参与者报告醒来时间(30/43)、“起床”时间(7/43)或下床时间(6/43)。背景指导出现在44项主要睡眠时间问题中的18项、47项就寝时间问题中的35项和43项起床时间问题中的34项中。时间范围在44项主要睡眠时段时长问题中的8项、47项就寝时间问题中的16项和43项起床时间问题中的10项中给出。一个问题询问了唤醒方式(例如,通过闹钟),18个问题评估了睡眠潜伏期,12个问题测量了小睡情况。
与睡眠相关问题的事件定义、背景和时间范围存在差异。这项工作为荟萃分析的数据协调工作提供了信息,为问题措辞提供了选项,并确定了未来调查的问题。