Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Global Health of Women, Adolescents, and Children (Global WACh), School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Analyst. 2022 Jul 12;147(14):3315-3327. doi: 10.1039/d2an00405d.
The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted routine care for individuals living with HIV, putting them at risk of virologic failure and HIV-associated illness. Often this population is at high risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and once infected, for severe disease. Therefore, close monitoring of HIV plasma viral load (VL) and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection are needed. We developed a non-proprietary method to isolate RNA from plasma, nasal secretions (NS), or both. The extracted RNA is then submitted to RT-qPCR to estimate the VL and classify HIV/SARS-CoV-2 status (, HIV virologic failure or suppressed; SARS-CoV-2 as positive, presumptive positive, negative, or indeterminate). In contrived samples, the in-house RNA extraction workflow achieved a detection limit of 200-copies per mL for HIV RNA in plasma and 100-copies per mL for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in NS. Similar detection limits were observed for HIV and SARS-CoV-2 in pooled plasma/NS contrived samples. When comparing in-house with standard extraction methods, we found high agreement (>0.91) between input and measured RNA copies for HIV LTR in contrived plasma; SARS-CoV-2 N1/N2 in contrived NS; and LTR, N1, and N2 in pooled plasma/NS samples. We further evaluated this workflow on 133 clinical specimens: 40 plasma specimens (30 HIV-positive), 67 NS specimens (31 SARS-CoV-2-positive), and 26 combined plasma/NS specimens (26 HIV-positive with 10 SARS-CoV-2-positive), and compared the results obtained using the in-house RNA extraction to those using a commercial kit (standard extraction method). The in-house extraction and standard extraction of clinical specimens were positively correlated: plasma HIV VL ( of 0.81) and NS SARS-CoV-2 VL ( of 0.95 and 0.99 for N1 and N2 genes, respectively); and pooled plasma/NS HIV VL ( of 0.71) and SARS-CoV-2 VL ( of 1 both for N1 and N2 genes). Our low-cost molecular test workflow ($1.85 per pooled sample extraction) for HIV RNA and SARS-CoV-2 RNA could serve as an alternative to current standard assays ($12 per pooled sample extraction) for laboratories in low-resource settings.
COVID-19 大流行中断了艾滋病毒感染者的常规护理,使他们面临病毒学失败和与艾滋病毒相关疾病的风险。这一人群通常有很高的感染 SARS-CoV-2 的风险,一旦感染,就会患上严重疾病。因此,需要密切监测艾滋病毒血浆病毒载量(VL)并筛查 SARS-CoV-2 感染。我们开发了一种从血浆、鼻腔分泌物(NS)或两者中分离 RNA 的非专利方法。提取的 RNA 随后提交给 RT-qPCR,以估计 VL 并分类 HIV/SARS-CoV-2 状态(HIV 病毒学失败或抑制;SARS-CoV-2 阳性、推定阳性、阴性或不确定)。在模拟样本中,内部 RNA 提取工作流程在血浆中 HIV RNA 的检测限达到 200 拷贝/mL,在 NS 中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的检测限达到 100 拷贝/mL。在混合血浆/NS 模拟样本中也观察到了 HIV 和 SARS-CoV-2 的类似检测限。当将内部方法与标准提取方法进行比较时,我们发现模拟血浆中 HIV LTR、模拟 NS 中 SARS-CoV-2 N1/N2 以及混合血浆/NS 样本中的 LTR、N1 和 N2 的输入和测量 RNA 拷贝之间具有高度一致性(>0.91)。我们进一步在 133 份临床标本上评估了该工作流程:40 份血浆标本(30 份 HIV 阳性)、67 份 NS 标本(31 份 SARS-CoV-2 阳性)和 26 份混合血浆/NS 标本(26 份 HIV 阳性,10 份 SARS-CoV-2 阳性),并将使用内部 RNA 提取获得的结果与使用商业试剂盒(标准提取方法)获得的结果进行了比较。临床标本的内部提取和标准提取呈正相关:血浆 HIV VL(0.81)和 NS SARS-CoV-2 VL(N1 和 N2 基因分别为 0.95 和 0.99);以及混合血浆/NS HIV VL(0.71)和 SARS-CoV-2 VL(0.71)。我们的 HIV RNA 和 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 低成本分子检测工作流程(每批混合样本提取 1.85 美元)可替代当前在资源匮乏环境下实验室使用的标准检测方法(每批混合样本提取 12 美元)。