• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言对嗓音质量的影响:普通话和英语双语者的声学研究。

Effect of Language on Voice Quality: An Acoustic Study of Bilingual Speakers of Mandarin Chinese and English.

机构信息

Department of Applied Foreign Language Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Speech Science Laboratory, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(6):421-430. doi: 10.1159/000525649. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1159/000525649
PMID:35764052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9808749/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies reported discrepant vocal qualities associated with different languages. However, possible physical differences associated with speakers of different ethnicities were not accounted for. The present study attempted to examine the effect of language on one's voice quality by eliminating the potential effects of physical differences associated with speakers of different languages.

METHODS

Sixteen Chinese and fourteen Americans who were proficient in both Mandarin Chinese and English were recruited. They were instructed to read one Chinese and one English passage. Time-domain and long-term average spectral analyses were carried out, and speaking fundamental frequency (sF0), jitter, shimmer, and first spectral peak (FSP), mean spectral energy (MSE), and spectral tilt (ST) were measured using Praat.

RESULTS

Acoustic measures revealed no differences in sF0, FSP, and ST between Americans and Chinese. However, jitter, shimmer, and MSE values appeared to be affected by ethnicity (Chinese vs. Americans). Jitter and shimmer tended to be greater when someone was speaking his/her mother tongue. For language effect, Chinese was found to be associated with a faster rate of vocal fold vibration than English. MSE was higher for Chinese than English produced by Chinese, but not by American speakers, despite the similar ST in both languages.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Based on speech samples obtained from the balanced groups of bilingual speakers, the findings confirmed the presence of language effect on one's voice quality. Laryngeal activity appeared to be affected by the language being spoken.

摘要

简介

先前的研究报告称,不同语言与不同的嗓音质量有关。然而,不同种族的人之间可能存在的生理差异并没有被考虑在内。本研究试图通过消除不同语言使用者的生理差异的潜在影响,来检验语言对一个人嗓音质量的影响。

方法

招募了 16 名精通汉语普通话和英语的中国人和 14 名美国人。他们被要求朗读一段中文和一段英文。对时域和长期平均频谱进行了分析,并使用 Praat 测量了基频(sF0)、抖动、颤抖和第一谱峰(FSP)、平均谱能量(MSE)和谱倾斜(ST)。

结果

声学测量结果显示,美国人与中国人之间的 sF0、FSP 和 ST 没有差异。然而,抖动、颤抖和 MSE 值似乎受到种族(中国人与美国人)的影响。当一个人说母语时,抖动和颤抖的值往往更大。对于语言效应,发现中国人的声带振动速度比英语快。尽管两种语言的 ST 相似,但中国人说汉语的 MSE 比英语高,而美国人则不然。

讨论/结论:基于双语说话者平衡组获得的语音样本,研究结果证实了语言对嗓音质量的影响。发音的喉部活动似乎受到所讲语言的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/253f2b2befe6/fpl-0074-0421-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/f32802ca0bed/fpl-0074-0421-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/1d0f8a0b39a8/fpl-0074-0421-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/fa455eea8673/fpl-0074-0421-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/19fb3231de43/fpl-0074-0421-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/209ce5b7234a/fpl-0074-0421-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/253f2b2befe6/fpl-0074-0421-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/f32802ca0bed/fpl-0074-0421-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/1d0f8a0b39a8/fpl-0074-0421-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/fa455eea8673/fpl-0074-0421-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/19fb3231de43/fpl-0074-0421-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/209ce5b7234a/fpl-0074-0421-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ca/9808749/253f2b2befe6/fpl-0074-0421-g06.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Language on Voice Quality: An Acoustic Study of Bilingual Speakers of Mandarin Chinese and English.语言对嗓音质量的影响:普通话和英语双语者的声学研究。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(6):421-430. doi: 10.1159/000525649. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Differences in vocal characteristics between Cantonese and English produced by proficient Cantonese-English bilingual speakers--a long-term average spectral analysis.熟练的粤语-英语双语者发出的粤语和英语的发声特征差异——长期平均频谱分析。
J Voice. 2012 Jul;26(4):e171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
3
Do Voice Acoustic Parameters Differ Between Bilingual English-Spanish Speakers and Monolingual English Speakers During English Productions?在说英语时,双语(英语 - 西班牙语)使用者和单语英语使用者的语音声学参数有差异吗?
J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
4
Bilingualism and Voice Production. Differences Between Bilingual Latin-American Spanish- English Female Speakers and Monolingual Spanish Female Speakers During Spanish Productions.双语与发声。西班牙语-英语双语拉丁美洲女性说话者和西班牙语单语女性说话者在西班牙语发音时的差异。
J Voice. 2023 Sep;37(5):716-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
The Impact of Language on Voice: An LTAS Study.语言对嗓音的影响:一项长期听觉阈移研究
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):249.e9-249.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Effect of Face Masks on Voice Quality Associated with Young and Older Chinese Adult Speakers.口罩对中国青年和老年成年说话者语音质量的影响。
J Voice. 2024 Jun 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.04.025.
7
The Effect of Bilingualism on Production and Perception of Vocal Fry.双语对气泡音产生和感知的影响。
J Voice. 2023 Nov;37(6):970.e1-970.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
Chinese-English Speakers' Perception of Pitch in Their Non-Tonal Language: Reinterpreting English as a Tonal-Like Language.汉英双语者对非声调语言中音高的感知:重新解读英语作为一种类声调语言。
Lang Speech. 2021 Jun;64(2):467-487. doi: 10.1177/0023830919894606. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin.英语和普通话基频的比较。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1050-60. doi: 10.1121/1.4730893.
10
Long-term average spectral characteristics of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.粤语无喉语音的长期平均频谱特征。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Oct;36(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction in Voice Feminization Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.嗓音女性化手术的疗效与患者满意度:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May;172(5):1521-1538. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1173. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Brain anatomy differences in Chinese children who stutter: a preliminary study.中国口吃儿童的脑解剖结构差异:一项初步研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 27;16:1483157. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1483157. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital Vocal Biomarker of Smoking Status Using Ecological Audio Recordings: Results from the Colive Voice Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Language on Voice: An LTAS Study.语言对嗓音的影响:一项长期听觉阈移研究
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):249.e9-249.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Differences in vocal characteristics between Cantonese and English produced by proficient Cantonese-English bilingual speakers--a long-term average spectral analysis.熟练的粤语-英语双语者发出的粤语和英语的发声特征差异——长期平均频谱分析。
J Voice. 2012 Jul;26(4):e171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
3
Voice pitch characteristics of Cantonese and English produced by Cantonese-English bilingual children.
利用生态录音的吸烟状况数字语音生物标志物:Colive Voice研究结果
Digit Biomark. 2024 Aug 28;8(1):159-170. doi: 10.1159/000540327. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Clinical Utility and Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality and Acoustic Breathiness Indexes for Voice Disorder Assessment in English Speakers.用于评估英语使用者嗓音障碍的声学嗓音质量和声学呼吸音指数的临床效用及验证
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 14;12(24):7679. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247679.
5
The Impact of Foreign Language Accent on Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Evaluations of Dysphonia.外语口音对专家听众对发声障碍听觉感知评估的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2024 May;134(5):2272-2276. doi: 10.1002/lary.31160. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Association Between Bilingualism, Vocal Effort, and Background Noise With Voice Fundamental Frequency and LTAS Among Spanish-English Bilingual Teachers.西班牙语-英语双语教师的双语能力、发声努力、背景噪音与语音基频及长期平均谱之间的关联
J Voice. 2023 Oct 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.09.001.
粤英双语儿童所产出的粤语和英语的音高特征。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Jun;12(3):230-6. doi: 10.3109/17549501003721080.
4
Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.在语音诊所中进行可靠的抖动和颤抖测量:在典型临床任务中母音、性别、发声强度和基频效应的相关性。
J Voice. 2011 Jan;25(1):44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.07.002. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
5
Long-term average spectral characteristics of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.粤语无喉语音的长期平均频谱特征。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Oct;36(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
6
Volumetric measurements of vocal tracts for male speakers from different races.不同种族男性说话者声道的容积测量。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2006 Nov;20(9):691-702. doi: 10.1080/02699200500297716.
7
Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English/Russian, and bilingual English/Cantonese young adult women.单语英语、英俄双语以及英粤双语成年女性的基频
J Voice. 2006 Mar;20(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.005. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
8
Spectral moments of the long-term average spectrum: sensitive indices of voice change after therapy?长期平均频谱的谱矩:治疗后嗓音变化的敏感指标?
J Voice. 2005 Jun;19(2):211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.005.
9
Multimodal standardization of voice among four multicultural populations: fundamental frequency and spectral characteristics.四个多元文化群体语音的多模态标准化:基频和频谱特征
J Voice. 2001 Jun;15(2):194-219. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(01)00021-2.
10
Effects of race and sex on acoustic features of voice analysis.种族和性别对语音分析声学特征的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):951-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.3.951.