• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体内共沉思和沉思在青少年时期的变化:检验异质性和性别与时间的调节作用。

Within-person Changes in Co-rumination and Rumination in Adolescence: Examining Heterogeneity and the Moderating Roles of Gender and Time.

机构信息

Columbia University Department of Psychology, 1180 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Boston University School of Medicine Department of Neurology, 720 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Oct;51(10):1958-1969. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01647-9. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-022-01647-9
PMID:35776231
Abstract

Although previous work has consistently identified positive associations between co-rumination and rumination during adolescence, little to no research has examined how this relationship operates on the person-specific level. The current study aimed to extend current developmental theories of co-rumination and rumination by examining within-person associations between these constructs. Survey data was collected from 1502 adolescents (M = 13.20; 52% girls; 52% non-Hispanic White) every six-months across the span of 3.5 years. The results showed that at time-points when adolescents reported co-ruminating more than their usual level, they reported concurrent increases in rumination. This association was stronger for boys and strengthened over time. Despite substantial between-person heterogeneity, 97% of adolescents showed positive associations between co-rumination and rumination. This research has important implications for mental health professionals, school systems, and parents who may look to teach adolescents about effective emotion-regulation.

摘要

尽管先前的研究一致表明,在青少年时期,共同沉思与沉思之间存在积极的关联,但几乎没有研究探讨这种关系在个体层面上是如何运作的。本研究旨在通过检验这些结构之间的个体内关联,扩展关于共同沉思和沉思的现有发展理论。从 3.5 年的跨度内,每六个月从 1502 名青少年(M=13.20;52%为女孩;52%为非西班牙裔白人)那里收集调查数据。结果表明,当青少年报告的共同沉思程度超过平时水平时,他们报告的沉思程度也随之增加。这种关联在男孩中更强,并随着时间的推移而增强。尽管存在大量的个体间异质性,但 97%的青少年在共同沉思和沉思之间表现出积极的关联。这项研究对心理健康专业人士、学校系统和家长具有重要意义,他们可能希望教导青少年有效的情绪调节方法。

相似文献

1
Within-person Changes in Co-rumination and Rumination in Adolescence: Examining Heterogeneity and the Moderating Roles of Gender and Time.个体内共沉思和沉思在青少年时期的变化:检验异质性和性别与时间的调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Oct;51(10):1958-1969. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01647-9. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
Co-rumination across in-person and digital communication: Associations with affect and relationship closeness in adolescents.面对面和数字通信中的共同反刍:与青少年的情感和关系亲密的关联。
J Adolesc. 2021 Jun;89:161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Communication modality matters: Co-rumination via in-person versus digital modalities has different prospective associations with depression and friendship quality.沟通方式很重要:面对面的共同反思和数字方式的共同反思对抑郁和友谊质量有不同的前瞻性关联。
J Adolesc. 2024 Apr;96(3):645-658. doi: 10.1002/jad.12289. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Friends' discussions of interpersonal and noninterpersonal problems during early and middle adolescence: Associations with co-rumination.青少年早期和中期朋友间关于人际和非人际问题的讨论:与共同反刍的关联。
Dev Psychol. 2022 Dec;58(12):2350-2357. doi: 10.1037/dev0001445. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Co-Rumination Exacerbates Stress Generation among Adolescents with Depressive Symptoms.共同反刍会加剧有抑郁症状青少年的压力产生。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;45(5):985-995. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0205-1.
6
Moderating effects of brooding and co-rumination on the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms in early adolescence: a multi-wave study.沉思和共同反刍对青少年早期压力与抑郁症状关系的调节作用:一项多波研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 May;43(4):607-18. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9912-7.
7
A longitudinal view of rumination, poor sleep and psychological distress in adolescents.青少年时期的反刍思维、睡眠质量差和心理困扰的纵向研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.053. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Co-rumination and co-problem solving in the daily lives of adolescents with major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症青少年日常生活中的共同反刍和共同解决问题
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;53(8):869-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 27.
9
Clarifying co-rumination: associations with internalizing symptoms and romantic involvement among adolescent girls.厘清共同反刍:青春期女孩内化症状与恋爱关系之间的关联
J Adolesc. 2009 Feb;32(1):19-37. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
10
Talking Together, Thinking Alone: Relations among Co-Rumination, Peer Relationships, and Rumination.独自思考,结伴言谈:共沉思、同伴关系与沉思的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Apr;48(4):731-743. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0937-z. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Network Structure and Core Features of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies in Chinese Adolescents with NSSI.有非自杀性自伤行为的中国青少年认知情绪调节策略的网络结构及核心特征
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Apr 29;18:1075-1084. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S499710. eCollection 2025.
2
Gender differences in co-rumination and transition shock among nursing interns in China: a cross-sectional study.中国护理实习生共同反刍与过渡冲击的性别差异:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 15;24(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03089-7.
3
Co-Rumination as a Moderator Between Best-Friend Support and Adolescent Psychological Distress.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling heterogeneity in the simultaneous emotional costs and social benefits of co-rumination.共沉思的情绪成本和社会收益的同时异质性建模。
Emotion. 2021 Oct;21(7):1470-1482. doi: 10.1037/emo0001028. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
2
Rumination and executive functions: Understanding cognitive vulnerability for psychopathology.反刍思维与执行功能:理解心理病理学的认知脆弱性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:550-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
3
The influence of emotion-focused rumination and distraction on depressive symptoms in non-clinical youth: a meta-analytic review.
作为亲密朋友支持与青少年心理困扰之间调节因素的共同反刍
J Adolesc. 2025 Jul;97(5):1161-1172. doi: 10.1002/jad.12483. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
4
The daily relations of co-rumination and perseverative cognition.共同反刍与持续认知的日常关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 24;15(1):3021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87335-7.
5
Examining Dyadic Stress Appraisal Processes Within Romantic Relationships from a Challenge and Threat Perspective.从挑战和威胁视角审视浪漫关系中的二元压力评估过程。
Affect Sci. 2024 Jan 30;5(2):69-81. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00235-3. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Effectiveness of a blended school-based mindfulness program for the prevention of co-rumination and internalizing problems in Dutch secondary school girls: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于混合的学校正念项目预防荷兰中学女生共沉思和内化问题的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07885-x.
情绪聚焦性沉思和分心对非临床青少年抑郁症状的影响:一项元分析综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Nov;29(7):607-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 17.