• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可穿戴设备对慢性病医疗效果的影响:系统评价。

The Influence of Wearables on Health Care Outcomes in Chronic Disease: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Queensland Digital Health Research Network, Global Change Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Metro North Hospitals and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):e36690. doi: 10.2196/36690.

DOI:10.2196/36690
PMID:35776492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288104/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases contribute to high rates of disability and mortality. Patient engagement in chronic disease self-management is an essential component of chronic disease models of health care. Wearables provide patient-centered health data in real time, which can help inform self-management decision-making. Despite the perceived benefits of wearables in improving chronic disease self-management, their influence on health care outcomes remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to examine the influence of wearables on health care outcomes in individuals with chronic diseases through a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

A narrative systematic review was conducted by searching 6 databases for randomized and observational studies published between January 1, 2016, and July 1, 2021, that included the use of a wearable intervention in a chronic disease group to assess its impact on a predefined outcome measure. These outcomes were defined as any influence on the patient or clinician experience, cost-effectiveness, or health care outcomes as a result of the wearable intervention. Data from the included studies were extracted based on 6 key themes, which formed the basis for a narrative qualitative synthesis. All outcomes were mapped against each component of the Quadruple Aim of health care. The guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement were followed in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 30 articles were included; studies reported 2446 participants (mean age: range 10.1-74.4 years), and the influence of 14 types of wearables on 18 chronic diseases was presented. The most studied chronic diseases were type 2 diabetes (4/30, 13%), Parkinson disease (3/30, 10%), and chronic lower back pain (3/30, 10%). The results were mixed when assessing the impact on a predefined primary outcome, with 50% (15/30) of studies finding a positive influence on the studied outcome and 50% (15/30) demonstrating a nil effect. There was a positive effect of 3D virtual reality systems on chronic pain in 7% (2/30) of studies that evaluated 2 distinct chronic pain syndromes. Mixed results were observed in influencing exercise capacity; weight; and biomarkers of disease, such as hemoglobin A, in diabetes. In total, 155 outcomes were studied. Most (139/155, 89.7%) addressed the health care outcomes component. This included pain (11/155, 7.5%), quality of life (7/155, 4.8%), and physical function (5/155, 3.4%). Approximately 7.7% (12/155) of outcome measures represented the patient experience component, with 1.3% (2/155) addressing the clinician experience and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Given their popularity and capability, wearables may play an integral role in chronic disease management. However, further research is required to generate a strong evidence base for safe and effective implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021244562; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=244562.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bd/9288104/81f6f80a95df/jmir_v24i7e36690_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bd/9288104/81f6f80a95df/jmir_v24i7e36690_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bd/9288104/81f6f80a95df/jmir_v24i7e36690_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

慢性病导致高残疾率和死亡率。患者参与慢性病自我管理是慢性病医疗模式的重要组成部分。可穿戴设备实时提供以患者为中心的健康数据,有助于指导自我管理决策。尽管可穿戴设备在改善慢性病自我管理方面具有明显的优势,但它们对医疗保健结果的影响仍知之甚少。

目的

本综述旨在通过系统综述文献,考察可穿戴设备对慢性病患者医疗保健结果的影响。

方法

对 6 个数据库进行了叙述性系统综述,以搜索 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 1 日期间发表的随机和观察性研究,这些研究使用可穿戴设备干预来评估其对预定义结果测量的影响。这些结果被定义为可穿戴设备干预对患者或临床医生体验、成本效益或医疗保健结果的任何影响。根据 6 个关键主题提取纳入研究的数据,这些主题构成了叙述性定性综合的基础。所有结果都与医疗保健四重目标的每个组成部分相对应。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明的指南。

结果

共纳入 30 篇文章;研究报告了 2446 名参与者(平均年龄:范围 10.1-74.4 岁),并介绍了 14 种可穿戴设备对 18 种慢性病的影响。研究最多的慢性病是 2 型糖尿病(4/30,13%)、帕金森病(3/30,10%)和慢性腰痛(3/30,10%)。评估预定义主要结果的影响时,结果喜忧参半,50%(15/30)的研究发现对研究结果有积极影响,50%(15/30)显示无效果。有 3 项研究评估了 2 种不同的慢性疼痛综合征,发现 3D 虚拟现实系统对慢性疼痛有积极影响(7%[2/30])。在影响运动能力、体重和疾病生物标志物(如血红蛋白 A)方面,观察到混合结果。共有 155 个结果进行了研究。大多数(139/155,89.7%)涉及医疗保健结果部分。这包括疼痛(11/155,7.5%)、生活质量(7/155,4.8%)和身体功能(5/155,3.4%)。约 7.7%(12/155)的测量结果代表患者体验部分,其中 1.3%(2/155)涉及临床医生体验和成本。

结论

鉴于可穿戴设备的普及性和功能,它们可能在慢性病管理中发挥重要作用。然而,需要进一步的研究来为安全有效的实施提供坚实的证据基础。

试验注册

PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心 CRD42021244562;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=244562。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Wearables on Health Care Outcomes in Chronic Disease: Systematic Review.可穿戴设备对慢性病医疗效果的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):e36690. doi: 10.2196/36690.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Flexible Wearable Heart Rate Monitoring System and Low-Power Design: A Review.柔性可穿戴心率监测系统与低功耗设计:综述
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;25(16):4913. doi: 10.3390/s25164913.
2
Wearable Devices & Elderly: A Bibliometric Analysis of 2014-2024.可穿戴设备与老年人:2014 - 2024年文献计量分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;13(16):2066. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162066.
3
The Safety of 12-Weekly Monitoring of Neutrophil Count in Long-Term Clozapine Patients.长期服用氯氮平患者中性粒细胞计数每12周监测一次的安全性

本文引用的文献

1
Recent Advances in Wearable Sensing Technologies.可穿戴传感器技术的最新进展。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;21(20):6828. doi: 10.3390/s21206828.
2
Review of Wearable Devices and Data Collection Considerations for Connected Health.可穿戴设备综述及联网健康数据采集注意事项
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 19;21(16):5589. doi: 10.3390/s21165589.
3
AI and Big Data in Healthcare: Towards a More Comprehensive Research Framework for Multimorbidity.医疗保健中的人工智能与大数据:迈向更全面的多重疾病研究框架
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Sep;152(3):187-192. doi: 10.1111/acps.13818. Epub 2025 May 3.
4
Nurses' perspectives on AI-Enabled wearable health technologies: opportunities and challenges in clinical practice.护士对人工智能支持的可穿戴健康技术的看法:临床实践中的机遇与挑战
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03343-y.
5
Effect of Self-Quantification on Caregiver Burden and Depression Among Family Caregivers: A SWING-Japan Study.自我量化对家庭照顾者照顾负担及抑郁的影响:一项日本SWING研究
Psychogeriatrics. 2025 Jul;25(4):e70053. doi: 10.1111/psyg.70053.
6
Current status of older people with chronic diseases adopting digital health technologies: A scoping review.患有慢性病的老年人采用数字健康技术的现状:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 4;11:20552076251348578. doi: 10.1177/20552076251348578. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Advancements in Wearable and Implantable BioMEMS Devices: Transforming Healthcare Through Technology.可穿戴和植入式生物微机电系统设备的进展:通过技术变革医疗保健。
Micromachines (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;16(5):522. doi: 10.3390/mi16050522.
8
Perspectives of people with diabetes on AI-integrated wearable devices: perceived benefits, barriers, and opportunities for self-management.糖尿病患者对集成人工智能的可穿戴设备的看法:自我管理的感知益处、障碍和机会。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 23;12:1563003. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1563003. eCollection 2025.
9
Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.预防2型糖尿病的数字健康干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67507. doi: 10.2196/67507.
10
The experience and perception of wearable devices in Parkinson's disease patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.帕金森病患者对可穿戴设备的体验与认知:定性研究的系统评价与元综合分析
J Neurol. 2025 Apr 19;272(5):350. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13085-1.
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 14;10(4):766. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040766.
4
A randomized controlled trial investigating effects of an individualized pedometer driven walking program on chronic low back pain.一项随机对照试验,旨在研究个体化计步器驱动的步行计划对慢性下腰痛的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 19;22(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04060-8.
5
Wearable Biosensors: An Alternative and Practical Approach in Healthcare and Disease Monitoring.可穿戴生物传感器:医疗保健和疾病监测的一种替代和实用方法。
Molecules. 2021 Feb 1;26(3):748. doi: 10.3390/molecules26030748.
6
An 8-Week Self-Administered At-Home Behavioral Skills-Based Virtual Reality Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Conducted During COVID-19.一项针对慢性下腰痛的 8 周自我管理家庭行为技能为基础的虚拟现实程序:在 COVID-19 期间进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e26292. doi: 10.2196/26292.
7
Adherence to walking exercise prescription during pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD with a commercial activity monitor: a feasibility trial.使用商业活动监测器在 COPD 肺康复中坚持步行运动处方:一项可行性试验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01406-9.
8
Physical activity monitoring to assess disability progression in multiple sclerosis.通过身体活动监测评估多发性硬化症的残疾进展
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020 Dec 7;6(4):2055217320975185. doi: 10.1177/2055217320975185. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
9
Innovative intelligent insole system reduces diabetic foot ulcer recurrence at plantar sites: a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept study.创新智能鞋垫系统降低足底部位糖尿病足溃疡复发率:一项前瞻性、随机、概念验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Oct;1(6):e308-e318. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30128-1. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Mobile Health App With Social Media to Support Self-Management for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.带社交媒体的移动健康应用程序支持慢性肾脏病患者的自我管理:前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 15;22(12):e19452. doi: 10.2196/19452.