Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, DeSales University, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA.
Phys Ther. 2022 Sep 4;102(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac087.
Physical therapists are uniquely positioned through their knowledge and skills to help people become more physically active, which may reduce the consequences of physical inactivity for health-related quality of life and the global economy. The "Exercise Is Medicine" campaign was introduced in 2007. It holds that exercise may be prescribed like a medicine. Although this analogy doubtlessly has promoted innumerable life-changing conversations between clinicians and patients, there are important shortcomings to considering physical activity and exercise as medicine. In the United States, many of these shortcomings relate to how medical services are provided and remunerated. Medical care is provided in the context of exclusive groups, which are established by insurance, preferred service populations, or other characteristics that determine a basis for providing care. Exclusivity means that medical care is frequently provided in a type of club. The club structure of medical care jeopardizes the ability of nonmembers to benefit. Medical care clubs based on payment create an environment in which nonpaying customers may not benefit in the same manner as paying customers from approaches that consider exercise prescribed as medicine. This clinical perspective reviews the characteristics of exercise as a good, focusing on how it is prescribed by physical therapists. It discusses how physical therapists may become involved in the process of making exercise a public good by reducing its exclusivity. Multiple levels of involvement are recommended at the societal, community, and individual levels. These involvements may be guided by an existing construct proposed by the World Health Organization, which would bring the global physical therapy profession into a common alignment. This Perspective concludes with a discussion that anticipates the shortcomings of conceptualizing exercise as a public good to be addressed in future service delivery models.
物理治疗师凭借其知识和技能,能够帮助人们变得更加活跃,这可能会降低身体活动不足对健康相关生活质量和全球经济的影响。“运动是良医”运动于 2007 年推出。它认为运动可以像药物一样开处方。虽然这种类比无疑促进了无数临床医生和患者之间改变生活的对话,但将身体活动和运动视为药物存在一些重要的缺陷。在美国,这些缺陷中的许多与医疗服务的提供和报酬方式有关。医疗服务是在特定群体的背景下提供的,这些群体是由保险、首选服务人群或其他特征确定的,这些特征决定了提供医疗服务的基础。排他性意味着医疗服务通常是在一种俱乐部式的环境中提供的。医疗服务的俱乐部结构危及非会员受益的能力。基于支付的医疗服务俱乐部创造了一种环境,在这种环境中,非付费客户可能无法像付费客户那样从将运动视为药物的方法中受益。这种临床观点回顾了运动作为一种商品的特点,重点关注物理治疗师如何开处方。它讨论了物理治疗师如何通过降低其排他性,参与将运动作为公共产品的过程。建议在社会、社区和个人层面上采取多层次的参与。这些参与可以以世界卫生组织提出的现有结构为指导,这将使全球物理治疗行业达成共同一致。本文以讨论作为公共产品的运动的概念化的缺陷为结尾,这些缺陷将在未来的服务提供模式中得到解决。